Gender disparities in adult patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy: A comparative analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Scottish Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1177/00369330241307340
Gillian Miller, Lewis S Gall, Andrew Macdonald, Khurram Shahzad Khan
{"title":"Gender disparities in adult patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy: A comparative analysis.","authors":"Gillian Miller, Lewis S Gall, Andrew Macdonald, Khurram Shahzad Khan","doi":"10.1177/00369330241307340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency appendicectomy (EA) is a common procedure, yet few studies have focused on gender differences in these patients. This study aims to evaluate the demographics, preoperative investigations, intraoperative findings, and clinical outcomes between males and females undergoing EA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted across four hospitals involving patients who underwent EA between August 2018 and November 2025. Patients were identified through pathology records, and data were collected on demographics, preoperative blood tests, imaging, operative details, and clinical outcomes and results compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1128 patients were included, with 57.5% being male. Males were younger (median age: 34 vs 40 years, <i>P</i> < .001). There was no significant difference in preoperative white cell or neutrophil counts, although males had lower C-reactive protein levels (median 72 vs 97, <i>P</i> < .001). Females were more likely to undergo pre-operative imaging, including ultrasound (20.7% vs 1.5%, <i>P</i> < .001) and CT scans (61.8% vs 54.9%, <i>P</i> = .020). Open surgery was more common in males (14% vs 6.5%, <i>P</i> < .001). No differences were observed in the severity of appendicitis, negative EA rates, hospital stay duration, postoperative complications, or 30-day readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although differences exist between genders in terms of age, imaging usage, and surgical approach, clinical outcomes are comparable.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"369330241307340"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330241307340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency appendicectomy (EA) is a common procedure, yet few studies have focused on gender differences in these patients. This study aims to evaluate the demographics, preoperative investigations, intraoperative findings, and clinical outcomes between males and females undergoing EA.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted across four hospitals involving patients who underwent EA between August 2018 and November 2025. Patients were identified through pathology records, and data were collected on demographics, preoperative blood tests, imaging, operative details, and clinical outcomes and results compared.

Results: 1128 patients were included, with 57.5% being male. Males were younger (median age: 34 vs 40 years, P < .001). There was no significant difference in preoperative white cell or neutrophil counts, although males had lower C-reactive protein levels (median 72 vs 97, P < .001). Females were more likely to undergo pre-operative imaging, including ultrasound (20.7% vs 1.5%, P < .001) and CT scans (61.8% vs 54.9%, P = .020). Open surgery was more common in males (14% vs 6.5%, P < .001). No differences were observed in the severity of appendicitis, negative EA rates, hospital stay duration, postoperative complications, or 30-day readmission rates.

Conclusions: Although differences exist between genders in terms of age, imaging usage, and surgical approach, clinical outcomes are comparable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊阑尾切除术成人患者的性别差异:比较分析。
背景:急诊阑尾切除术(EA)是一种常见的手术,但很少有研究关注这些患者的性别差异。本研究旨在评估接受EA的男性和女性的人口统计学、术前调查、术中发现和临床结果。方法:在四家医院进行了一项多中心回顾性观察性研究,涉及2018年8月至2025年11月期间接受EA的患者。通过病理记录确定患者,并收集人口统计学、术前血液检查、影像学、手术细节、临床结局和结果比较等数据。结果:共纳入1128例患者,男性占57.5%。男性更年轻(中位年龄:34岁vs 40岁,P P P P = 0.020)。结论:尽管性别在年龄、影像学使用和手术入路方面存在差异,但临床结果具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scottish Medical Journal
Scottish Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique international information source for the latest news and issues concerning the Scottish medical community. Contributions are drawn from Scotland and its medical institutions, through an array of international authors. In addition to original papers, Scottish Medical Journal publishes commissioned educational review articles, case reports, historical articles, and sponsoring society abstracts.This journal is a member of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Gender disparities in adult patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy: A comparative analysis. Routine preoperative blood group and save is unnecessary for adult emergency appendicectomies: A retrospective multicentre study. Efficacy and outcomes of a highland prehospital trauma response team. Pancreatic insulinomas: Our 15-year surgical experience. Influence of core stabilization exercise on physical function and muscle thickness in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1