Gillian Miller, Lewis S Gall, Andrew Macdonald, Khurram Shahzad Khan
{"title":"Gender disparities in adult patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy: A comparative analysis.","authors":"Gillian Miller, Lewis S Gall, Andrew Macdonald, Khurram Shahzad Khan","doi":"10.1177/00369330241307340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency appendicectomy (EA) is a common procedure, yet few studies have focused on gender differences in these patients. This study aims to evaluate the demographics, preoperative investigations, intraoperative findings, and clinical outcomes between males and females undergoing EA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted across four hospitals involving patients who underwent EA between August 2018 and November 2025. Patients were identified through pathology records, and data were collected on demographics, preoperative blood tests, imaging, operative details, and clinical outcomes and results compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1128 patients were included, with 57.5% being male. Males were younger (median age: 34 vs 40 years, <i>P</i> < .001). There was no significant difference in preoperative white cell or neutrophil counts, although males had lower C-reactive protein levels (median 72 vs 97, <i>P</i> < .001). Females were more likely to undergo pre-operative imaging, including ultrasound (20.7% vs 1.5%, <i>P</i> < .001) and CT scans (61.8% vs 54.9%, <i>P</i> = .020). Open surgery was more common in males (14% vs 6.5%, <i>P</i> < .001). No differences were observed in the severity of appendicitis, negative EA rates, hospital stay duration, postoperative complications, or 30-day readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although differences exist between genders in terms of age, imaging usage, and surgical approach, clinical outcomes are comparable.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"369330241307340"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330241307340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Emergency appendicectomy (EA) is a common procedure, yet few studies have focused on gender differences in these patients. This study aims to evaluate the demographics, preoperative investigations, intraoperative findings, and clinical outcomes between males and females undergoing EA.
Methods: A multicenter retrospective observational study was conducted across four hospitals involving patients who underwent EA between August 2018 and November 2025. Patients were identified through pathology records, and data were collected on demographics, preoperative blood tests, imaging, operative details, and clinical outcomes and results compared.
Results: 1128 patients were included, with 57.5% being male. Males were younger (median age: 34 vs 40 years, P < .001). There was no significant difference in preoperative white cell or neutrophil counts, although males had lower C-reactive protein levels (median 72 vs 97, P < .001). Females were more likely to undergo pre-operative imaging, including ultrasound (20.7% vs 1.5%, P < .001) and CT scans (61.8% vs 54.9%, P = .020). Open surgery was more common in males (14% vs 6.5%, P < .001). No differences were observed in the severity of appendicitis, negative EA rates, hospital stay duration, postoperative complications, or 30-day readmission rates.
Conclusions: Although differences exist between genders in terms of age, imaging usage, and surgical approach, clinical outcomes are comparable.
背景:急诊阑尾切除术(EA)是一种常见的手术,但很少有研究关注这些患者的性别差异。本研究旨在评估接受EA的男性和女性的人口统计学、术前调查、术中发现和临床结果。方法:在四家医院进行了一项多中心回顾性观察性研究,涉及2018年8月至2025年11月期间接受EA的患者。通过病理记录确定患者,并收集人口统计学、术前血液检查、影像学、手术细节、临床结局和结果比较等数据。结果:共纳入1128例患者,男性占57.5%。男性更年轻(中位年龄:34岁vs 40岁,P P P P = 0.020)。结论:尽管性别在年龄、影像学使用和手术入路方面存在差异,但临床结果具有可比性。
期刊介绍:
A unique international information source for the latest news and issues concerning the Scottish medical community. Contributions are drawn from Scotland and its medical institutions, through an array of international authors. In addition to original papers, Scottish Medical Journal publishes commissioned educational review articles, case reports, historical articles, and sponsoring society abstracts.This journal is a member of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).