Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioural Treatments for Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical psychology & psychotherapy Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1002/cpp.2989
Martin Polak, Norbert K. Tanzer
{"title":"Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioural Treatments for Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Martin Polak,&nbsp;Norbert K. Tanzer","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common mental health condition characterized by distressing, intrusive thoughts (obsessions) and repetitive behaviours (compulsions) aimed at reducing anxiety. Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) has emerged as an effective treatment modality for various mental health disorders. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of guided self-help ICBT (GSH ICBT) and unguided self-help ICBT (SH ICBT) against active and passive control conditions in adults with OCD. A comprehensive systematic literature search yielded 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 15 comparison arms (<i>N</i> = 1416) that met the inclusion criteria. Results indicate that GSH ICBT significantly reduced OCD symptomatology posttreatment compared to active controls (<i>g</i> = 0.378, <i>k</i> = 9), with no significant effects maintained at follow-up (<i>g</i> = 0.153, <i>k</i> = 4). GSH ICBT was also found to be as effective as active CBT interventions in reducing comorbid anxiety and depression symptoms posttreatment (<i>g</i> = 0.278, <i>k</i> = 6) and at follow-up (<i>g</i> = 0.124, <i>k</i> = 4). However, improvements in quality of life were not significant posttreatment (<i>g</i> = 0.115, <i>k</i> = 4) nor at follow-up (<i>g</i> = 0.179, <i>k</i> = 3). Combined GSH and SH ICBT demonstrated large effects on reducing OCD symptoms (<i>g</i> = 0.754, <i>k</i> = 6), medium effects on comorbid symptoms (<i>g</i> = 0.547, <i>k</i> = 6) and small effects on quality of life (<i>g</i> = 0.227, <i>k</i> = 2) when compared to inactive controls. No significant differences were found between GSH and SH ICBT in all measured outcomes posttreatment (OCD: <i>g</i> = 0.098, <i>k</i> = 3; AD: <i>g</i> = 0.070, <i>k</i> = 3; QoL: <i>g</i> = −0.030, <i>k</i> = 1) and at follow-up (OCD: <i>g</i> = 0.265, <i>k</i> = 2; AD: <i>g</i> = 0.084, <i>k</i> = 2; QoL: <i>g</i> = 0.00, <i>k</i> = 1). Sample size was identified as a significant moderator of treatment effects. This paper further explores clinical significance, treatment adherence, therapist time investment and moderator influences of the ICBT. The limitations of the study and recommendations for future research are thoroughly discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2989","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2989","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common mental health condition characterized by distressing, intrusive thoughts (obsessions) and repetitive behaviours (compulsions) aimed at reducing anxiety. Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) has emerged as an effective treatment modality for various mental health disorders. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of guided self-help ICBT (GSH ICBT) and unguided self-help ICBT (SH ICBT) against active and passive control conditions in adults with OCD. A comprehensive systematic literature search yielded 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 15 comparison arms (N = 1416) that met the inclusion criteria. Results indicate that GSH ICBT significantly reduced OCD symptomatology posttreatment compared to active controls (g = 0.378, k = 9), with no significant effects maintained at follow-up (g = 0.153, k = 4). GSH ICBT was also found to be as effective as active CBT interventions in reducing comorbid anxiety and depression symptoms posttreatment (g = 0.278, k = 6) and at follow-up (g = 0.124, k = 4). However, improvements in quality of life were not significant posttreatment (g = 0.115, k = 4) nor at follow-up (g = 0.179, k = 3). Combined GSH and SH ICBT demonstrated large effects on reducing OCD symptoms (g = 0.754, k = 6), medium effects on comorbid symptoms (g = 0.547, k = 6) and small effects on quality of life (g = 0.227, k = 2) when compared to inactive controls. No significant differences were found between GSH and SH ICBT in all measured outcomes posttreatment (OCD: g = 0.098, k = 3; AD: g = 0.070, k = 3; QoL: g = −0.030, k = 1) and at follow-up (OCD: g = 0.265, k = 2; AD: g = 0.084, k = 2; QoL: g = 0.00, k = 1). Sample size was identified as a significant moderator of treatment effects. This paper further explores clinical significance, treatment adherence, therapist time investment and moderator influences of the ICBT. The limitations of the study and recommendations for future research are thoroughly discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于互联网的认知行为治疗强迫症:系统回顾与元分析》。
强迫症(OCD)是一种常见的精神疾病,其特征是令人痛苦的、侵入性的想法(强迫症)和旨在减轻焦虑的重复性行为(强迫症)。基于互联网的认知行为疗法(ICBT)已成为治疗各种精神疾病的有效方法。本荟萃分析评估了有指导的自助 ICBT(GSH ICBT)和无指导的自助 ICBT(SH ICBT)在主动和被动控制条件下对成人强迫症患者的疗效。通过全面系统的文献检索,共有 12 项随机对照试验 (RCT),包括 15 个对比臂(N = 1416)符合纳入标准。结果表明,与主动对照组相比,GSH ICBT 在治疗后明显减轻了强迫症症状(g = 0.378,k = 9),但在后续治疗中没有显著效果(g = 0.153,k = 4)。研究还发现,在减少治疗后(g = 0.278,k = 6)和随访时(g = 0.124,k = 4)的合并焦虑和抑郁症状方面,GSH ICBT 与积极的 CBT 干预一样有效。然而,治疗后(g = 0.115,k = 4)和随访时(g = 0.179,k = 3)生活质量的改善并不显著。与非活动对照组相比,GSH 和 SH ICBT 联合疗法对减少强迫症症状有较大影响(g = 0.754,k = 6),对合并症状有中等影响(g = 0.547,k = 6),对生活质量有较小影响(g = 0.227,k = 2)。在治疗后(强迫症:g = 0.098,k = 3;注意力缺失症:g = 0.070,k = 3;生活质量:g = -0.030,k = 1)和随访时(强迫症:g = 0.265,k = 2;注意力缺失症:g = 0.084,k = 2;生活质量:g = 0.00,k = 1)的所有测量结果中,GSH 和 SH ICBT 之间均未发现明显差异。样本大小被认为是治疗效果的重要调节因素。本文进一步探讨了 ICBT 的临床意义、治疗依从性、治疗师的时间投入和调节因素的影响。本文对研究的局限性和未来研究的建议进行了深入探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
期刊最新文献
Presence and Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Reflective Functioning on Aggression in Adults With Antisocial Behaviour Do Therapists Know When Their Clients Deteriorate? An Investigation of Therapists' Ability to Estimate and Predict Client Change During and After Psychotherapy Resilience and Religious Coping in Libyan Survivors of Hurricane Daniele If You Give a Therapist a Network: A Qualitative Analysis of Therapists' Reactions to Their Patients' EMA-Based Network Models Intrusive Thoughts and Images in Health Anxiety: Rates, Characteristics, and Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1