Qianqian Liang, Abin Abraham, John A Capra, Dennis Kostka
{"title":"Disease-specific prioritization of non-coding GWAS variants based on chromatin accessibility.","authors":"Qianqian Liang, Abin Abraham, John A Capra, Dennis Kostka","doi":"10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-protein-coding genetic variants are a major driver of the genetic risk for human disease; however, identifying which non-coding variants contribute to diseases and their mechanisms remains challenging. In silico variant prioritization methods quantify a variant's severity, but for most methods, the specific phenotype and disease context of the prediction remain poorly defined. For example, many commonly used methods provide a single, organism-wide score for each variant, while other methods summarize a variant's impact in certain tissues and/or cell types. Here, we propose a complementary disease-specific variant prioritization scheme, which is motivated by the observation that variants contributing to disease often operate through specific biological mechanisms. We combine tissue/cell-type-specific variant scores (e.g., GenoSkyline, FitCons2, DNA accessibility) into disease-specific scores with a logistic regression approach and apply it to ∼25,000 non-coding variants spanning 111 diseases. We show that this disease-specific aggregation significantly improves the association of common non-coding genetic variants with disease (average precision: 0.151, baseline = 0.09), compared with organism-wide scores (GenoCanyon, LINSIGHT, GWAVA, Eigen, CADD; average precision: 0.129, baseline = 0.09). Further on, disease similarities based on data-driven aggregation weights highlight meaningful disease groups, and it provides information about tissues and cell types that drive these similarities. We also show that so-learned similarities are complementary to genetic similarities as quantified by genetic correlation. Overall, our approach demonstrates the strengths of disease-specific variant prioritization, leads to improvement in non-coding variant prioritization, and enables interpretable models that link variants to disease via specific tissues and/or cell types.</p>","PeriodicalId":34530,"journal":{"name":"HGG Advances","volume":" ","pages":"100310"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HGG Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Non-protein-coding genetic variants are a major driver of the genetic risk for human disease; however, identifying which non-coding variants contribute to diseases and their mechanisms remains challenging. In silico variant prioritization methods quantify a variant's severity, but for most methods, the specific phenotype and disease context of the prediction remain poorly defined. For example, many commonly used methods provide a single, organism-wide score for each variant, while other methods summarize a variant's impact in certain tissues and/or cell types. Here, we propose a complementary disease-specific variant prioritization scheme, which is motivated by the observation that variants contributing to disease often operate through specific biological mechanisms. We combine tissue/cell-type-specific variant scores (e.g., GenoSkyline, FitCons2, DNA accessibility) into disease-specific scores with a logistic regression approach and apply it to ∼25,000 non-coding variants spanning 111 diseases. We show that this disease-specific aggregation significantly improves the association of common non-coding genetic variants with disease (average precision: 0.151, baseline = 0.09), compared with organism-wide scores (GenoCanyon, LINSIGHT, GWAVA, Eigen, CADD; average precision: 0.129, baseline = 0.09). Further on, disease similarities based on data-driven aggregation weights highlight meaningful disease groups, and it provides information about tissues and cell types that drive these similarities. We also show that so-learned similarities are complementary to genetic similarities as quantified by genetic correlation. Overall, our approach demonstrates the strengths of disease-specific variant prioritization, leads to improvement in non-coding variant prioritization, and enables interpretable models that link variants to disease via specific tissues and/or cell types.