External Versus Internal Focus of Attention in Procedural Skills Learning: A Randomized Study.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005776
Natalia Tarasova, Parvathi Wilkins, David A Cook, V Shane Pankratz, Mark M Morrey, Torrey A Laack
{"title":"External Versus Internal Focus of Attention in Procedural Skills Learning: A Randomized Study.","authors":"Natalia Tarasova, Parvathi Wilkins, David A Cook, V Shane Pankratz, Mark M Morrey, Torrey A Laack","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Optimizing Performance Through Intrinsic Motivation and Attention for Learning (OPTIMAL) theory postulates that directing attention to the intended movement effect or outcome (external focus) is more effective than directing attention to the internal body motion or body part (internal focus). This study compared external versus internal focus of attention as novice students learned ultrasound-guided peripheral cannulation. The authors hypothesized that conditions promoting an external (vs internal) focus of attention would result in better performance on immediate and delayed (retention) testing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The authors conducted a randomized, experimental study from October 2022 to February 2023 comparing external and internal focus using ultrasound-guided peripheral venous cannulation followed by practice using an ultrasound training block. Undergraduate health science students performed 4 practice trials with instructions to focus on the needle tip (external focus) or their hands (internal focus), followed by immediate and delayed (retention) assessment 2 weeks later. The primary outcome was time to successful cannulation. Results were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and parametric survival analysis regression (accelerated failure time) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy participants completed the immediate assessment. The external focus group completed successful cannulation a mean of 2.33 times faster (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-3.67; P < .001) than those in the internal focus group (median time, 12.0 vs 29.5 seconds). Results also favored the external focus group during practice, with the external focus group successfully completing the task a mean of 1.83 times faster (95% CI, 1.04-3.21; P = .04) than the internal focus group. In the retention assessment, the external focus group successfully completed the task a mean of 2.37 times faster (95% CI, 1.19-4.74; P = .02) than the internal focus group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>External focus of attention compared with internal focus of attention improves medical motor skill learning in novice learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"319-324"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005776","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Optimizing Performance Through Intrinsic Motivation and Attention for Learning (OPTIMAL) theory postulates that directing attention to the intended movement effect or outcome (external focus) is more effective than directing attention to the internal body motion or body part (internal focus). This study compared external versus internal focus of attention as novice students learned ultrasound-guided peripheral cannulation. The authors hypothesized that conditions promoting an external (vs internal) focus of attention would result in better performance on immediate and delayed (retention) testing.

Method: The authors conducted a randomized, experimental study from October 2022 to February 2023 comparing external and internal focus using ultrasound-guided peripheral venous cannulation followed by practice using an ultrasound training block. Undergraduate health science students performed 4 practice trials with instructions to focus on the needle tip (external focus) or their hands (internal focus), followed by immediate and delayed (retention) assessment 2 weeks later. The primary outcome was time to successful cannulation. Results were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and parametric survival analysis regression (accelerated failure time) models.

Results: Seventy participants completed the immediate assessment. The external focus group completed successful cannulation a mean of 2.33 times faster (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-3.67; P < .001) than those in the internal focus group (median time, 12.0 vs 29.5 seconds). Results also favored the external focus group during practice, with the external focus group successfully completing the task a mean of 1.83 times faster (95% CI, 1.04-3.21; P = .04) than the internal focus group. In the retention assessment, the external focus group successfully completed the task a mean of 2.37 times faster (95% CI, 1.19-4.74; P = .02) than the internal focus group.

Conclusions: External focus of attention compared with internal focus of attention improves medical motor skill learning in novice learners.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
程序性技能学习中的外部与内部注意力集中:随机研究
目的:"通过内在动机和学习注意力优化成绩 "理论认为,将注意力引导到预期的运动效果或结果(外部注意力)比将注意力引导到身体内部运动或身体部位(内部注意力)更有效。本研究比较了新手学生在学习超声引导下外周插管时的外部和内部注意力集中情况。作者假设,在促进外部(与内部)注意力集中的条件下,即时和延迟(保持)测试的成绩会更好:作者在 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 2 月期间进行了一项随机实验研究,比较了使用超声引导外周静脉插管的外部和内部注意力集中情况,然后使用超声训练块进行了练习。健康科学专业的本科生进行了 4 次练习,指导他们将注意力集中在针尖(外聚焦)或手上(内聚焦),然后进行即时评估和 2 周后的保留评估。主要结果是成功插管的时间。结果采用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和参数生存分析回归(加速失败时间)模型进行比较:结果:70 名参与者完成了即时评估。外部重点组完成成功插管的平均时间比内部重点组快 2.33 倍(95% CI = 1.47,3.67;P < .001)(中位数时间为 12.0 秒 vs 29.5 秒)。在练习过程中,结果也更有利于外部焦点小组,外部焦点小组成功完成任务的平均速度是内部焦点小组的 1.83 倍(95% CI = 1.04,3.21;P = .04)。在保留评估中,外部注意力集中组成功完成任务的平均速度是内部注意力集中组的 2.37 倍(95% CI = 1.19,4.74;P = .02):结论:外部注意力集中与内部注意力集中相比,能改善新手的医疗运动技能学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
Accreditation Scholarship in International Medical Education. Female Mask: Unknown. Learning Through Teaching: How Physicians Learn Medicine in Authentic Clinical Contexts. External Versus Internal Focus of Attention in Procedural Skills Learning: A Randomized Study. The Likelihood That Remedial Continuing Medical Education (CME) Reduces Disciplinary Recidivism Among Physicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1