The Likelihood That Remedial Continuing Medical Education (CME) Reduces Disciplinary Recidivism Among Physicians.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005774
Katie Arnhart, Elizabeth Wenghofer, Xiaomei Pei, Aaron Young
{"title":"The Likelihood That Remedial Continuing Medical Education (CME) Reduces Disciplinary Recidivism Among Physicians.","authors":"Katie Arnhart, Elizabeth Wenghofer, Xiaomei Pei, Aaron Young","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>State medical boards are charged through their medical practice acts to regulate physician practice and, when necessary, discipline physicians for incompetent or inappropriate behavior. Boards often authorize remedial continuing medical education (CME) as part of a disciplinary action; however, it is unclear how effective remedial CME is in reducing the likelihood of physicians receiving additional discipline. This study examined the relationship between physicians who were required to complete remedial CME as part of their first discipline by state medical boards and the likelihood of additional discipline.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The national-level sample included 4,061 MD-physicians whose first discipline included license restrictions, probation, or other conditions imposed by state medical boards between 2011 and 2015. A multivariate logistic regression model examined whether physicians required to complete remedial CME as part of their first discipline were less likely to receive additional discipline by boards within 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4,061 physicians, 36% (n = 1,449) were required to complete remedial CME as part of their first discipline, and 35% (n = 1,426) received additional discipline within 5 years. After accounting for other factors, physicians who were required to complete remedial CME as part of their first discipline by boards were less likely to receive additional discipline (odds ratio, 0.597; 95% confidence interval, 0.513-0.696; P < .001) within 5 years compared to physicians who were not required to complete remedial CME.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support remedial CME as a means to help reduce physician disciplinary recidivism in certain circumstances. Physicians required to complete remedial CME as part of their first discipline were less likely to receive additional discipline by state medical boards within 5 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"351-357"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005774","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: State medical boards are charged through their medical practice acts to regulate physician practice and, when necessary, discipline physicians for incompetent or inappropriate behavior. Boards often authorize remedial continuing medical education (CME) as part of a disciplinary action; however, it is unclear how effective remedial CME is in reducing the likelihood of physicians receiving additional discipline. This study examined the relationship between physicians who were required to complete remedial CME as part of their first discipline by state medical boards and the likelihood of additional discipline.

Method: The national-level sample included 4,061 MD-physicians whose first discipline included license restrictions, probation, or other conditions imposed by state medical boards between 2011 and 2015. A multivariate logistic regression model examined whether physicians required to complete remedial CME as part of their first discipline were less likely to receive additional discipline by boards within 5 years.

Results: Of the 4,061 physicians, 36% (n = 1,449) were required to complete remedial CME as part of their first discipline, and 35% (n = 1,426) received additional discipline within 5 years. After accounting for other factors, physicians who were required to complete remedial CME as part of their first discipline by boards were less likely to receive additional discipline (odds ratio, 0.597; 95% confidence interval, 0.513-0.696; P < .001) within 5 years compared to physicians who were not required to complete remedial CME.

Conclusions: Findings support remedial CME as a means to help reduce physician disciplinary recidivism in certain circumstances. Physicians required to complete remedial CME as part of their first discipline were less likely to receive additional discipline by state medical boards within 5 years.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补救性继续医学教育(CME)降低医生违纪累犯率的可能性。
目的:各州医学委员会通过其医疗执业法案负责监管医生的执业行为,并在必要时对不称职或不当行为的医生进行纪律处分。委员会通常会将补救性继续医学教育(CME)作为纪律处分的一部分;然而,目前还不清楚补救性继续医学教育在降低医生受到额外纪律处分的可能性方面有多大作用。本研究考察了作为首次被州医学委员会处分的一部分而被要求完成补救性继续医学教育的医生与被追加处分的可能性之间的关系:国家级样本包括 2011 年至 2015 年间首次受到州医学委员会执照限制、缓刑或其他条件处分的 4061 名医学博士。一个多变量逻辑回归模型考察了作为首次处分的一部分而被要求完成补救性继续医学教育的医生在5年内受到委员会额外处分的可能性是否较小:在4061名医生中,36%(n=1449)的医生被要求完成补救性继续医学教育,作为其首次纪律处分的一部分,35%(n=1426)的医生在5年内受到额外纪律处分。在考虑了其他因素后,与未被要求完成补救性继续医学教育的医生相比,被委员会要求完成补救性继续医学教育作为其首次惩戒的一部分的医生在5年内受到额外惩戒的可能性较低(几率比=0.597;95%置信区间=0.513,0.696;P < .001):研究结果表明,在某些情况下,补救性继续医学教育有助于减少医生的违纪累犯率。作为首次处分的一部分,被要求完成补救性继续医学教育的医生在 5 年内受到州医学委员会追加处分的可能性较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
Accreditation Scholarship in International Medical Education. Female Mask: Unknown. Learning Through Teaching: How Physicians Learn Medicine in Authentic Clinical Contexts. External Versus Internal Focus of Attention in Procedural Skills Learning: A Randomized Study. The Likelihood That Remedial Continuing Medical Education (CME) Reduces Disciplinary Recidivism Among Physicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1