The role of food literacy and sustainable and healthy eating behaviors in ultra-processed foods consumption of undergraduate students

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105232
Arzu Kabasakal-Cetin, Beyza Aksaray, Gulsen Sen
{"title":"The role of food literacy and sustainable and healthy eating behaviors in ultra-processed foods consumption of undergraduate students","authors":"Arzu Kabasakal-Cetin,&nbsp;Beyza Aksaray,&nbsp;Gulsen Sen","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Few studies have explored the associations of food literacy and sustainable and healthy eating behaviors with ultra-processed food consumption. This cross-sectional study evaluated the possible role of both food literacy and sustainable and healthy eating behaviors in ultra-processed foods consumption of undergraduate students. The sample included 600 healthy university students aged 18 – 30 years. Dietary intake was assessed by two 24-h dietary recalls and percentage energy from each of the four NOVA categories—unprocessed/minimally processed, processed culinary ingredients, processed, and ultra-processed—was coded using NOVA. Food literacy was evaluated using self-perceived food literacy (SPFL) scale. Sustainable and healthy eating behaviors were assessed with Turkish version of sustainable and healthy eating behaviors scale. Multiple linear regression models, adjusted for sex, age, body mass index (BMI) and energy intake, were performed to examine the association between percentage energy from NOVA categories with food literacy and sustainable and healthy eating behaviors. Greater food literacy (β = 0.102, p = 0.034) and sustainable and healthy eating behaviors (β = 0.133, p = 0.006) predicted higher unprocessed/minimally processed food consumption. Lower food literacy (β = −0.140, p = 0.004) and sustainable and healthy eating behaviors (β = −0.104, p = 0.032) predicted higher ultra-processed foods (UPF) consumption. Results indicate that both food literacy and sustainable and healthy eating behaviors inversely associated with ultra-processed food consumption among undergraduate students. Future studies should investigate the longitudinal associations between food literacy, sustainable and healthy eating behaviors, and UPF consumption in order to provide different perspectives to develop food literacy programs and sustainable nutrition education which can contribute to reduce UPF consumption, so detrimental environmental impacts of UPF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 105232"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001344","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few studies have explored the associations of food literacy and sustainable and healthy eating behaviors with ultra-processed food consumption. This cross-sectional study evaluated the possible role of both food literacy and sustainable and healthy eating behaviors in ultra-processed foods consumption of undergraduate students. The sample included 600 healthy university students aged 18 – 30 years. Dietary intake was assessed by two 24-h dietary recalls and percentage energy from each of the four NOVA categories—unprocessed/minimally processed, processed culinary ingredients, processed, and ultra-processed—was coded using NOVA. Food literacy was evaluated using self-perceived food literacy (SPFL) scale. Sustainable and healthy eating behaviors were assessed with Turkish version of sustainable and healthy eating behaviors scale. Multiple linear regression models, adjusted for sex, age, body mass index (BMI) and energy intake, were performed to examine the association between percentage energy from NOVA categories with food literacy and sustainable and healthy eating behaviors. Greater food literacy (β = 0.102, p = 0.034) and sustainable and healthy eating behaviors (β = 0.133, p = 0.006) predicted higher unprocessed/minimally processed food consumption. Lower food literacy (β = −0.140, p = 0.004) and sustainable and healthy eating behaviors (β = −0.104, p = 0.032) predicted higher ultra-processed foods (UPF) consumption. Results indicate that both food literacy and sustainable and healthy eating behaviors inversely associated with ultra-processed food consumption among undergraduate students. Future studies should investigate the longitudinal associations between food literacy, sustainable and healthy eating behaviors, and UPF consumption in order to provide different perspectives to develop food literacy programs and sustainable nutrition education which can contribute to reduce UPF consumption, so detrimental environmental impacts of UPF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食品知识和可持续健康饮食行为在大学生超加工食品消费中的作用
很少有研究探讨食品素养和可持续健康饮食行为与超加工食品消费之间的关联。这项横断面研究评估了食品素养和可持续健康饮食行为在大学生超加工食品消费中可能发挥的作用。样本包括 600 名 18-30 岁的健康大学生。膳食摄入量通过两次 24 小时膳食回忆进行评估,来自 NOVA 四个类别(未加工/微加工、烹饪原料加工、加工和超加工)的能量百分比通过 NOVA 进行编码。食物素养采用自我感觉食物素养(SPFL)量表进行评估。可持续健康饮食行为采用土耳其版可持续健康饮食行为量表进行评估。在对性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)和能量摄入进行调整后,建立了多元线性回归模型,以研究 NOVA 类别中的能量百分比与食物素养以及可持续健康饮食行为之间的关系。较高的食品素养(β = 0.102,p = 0.034)和可持续健康饮食行为(β = 0.133,p = 0.006)预示着较高的未加工/微加工食品消费量。较低的食品素养(β = -0.140,p = 0.004)和可持续健康饮食行为(β = -0.104,p = 0.032)预示着较高的超加工食品(UPF)消费量。结果表明,食品素养和可持续健康饮食行为与大学生的超加工食品消费量成反比。未来的研究应调查食品素养、可持续健康饮食行为和超加工食品消费量之间的纵向关系,以便从不同角度制定食品素养计划和可持续营养教育,从而减少超加工食品的消费量,减少超加工食品对环境的有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board What differentiates the choice of certain foods? An exploratory analysis of food choice patterns among couples from the dyadic NutriAct Family Cohort in relation to social and health-associated determinants Parental norms and attitudes in Relation to Children’s sugar consumption − A mediation analysis of the “Are You Too Sweet?” intervention study Impact of olfactory priming on mental representations of food concepts and subsequent food choice Animal welfare has priority: Swiss consumers’ preferences for animal welfare, greenhouse gas reductions and other sustainability improvements in dairy products
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1