Idean Roohani, Tayla Moshal, Elizabeth M Boudiab, Eloise W Stanton, Paige Zachary, Jessica Lo, Joseph N Carey, David A Daar
{"title":"The Impact of Intraoperative Vasopressor Use and Fluid Status on Flap Survival in Traumatic Lower Extremity Reconstruction.","authors":"Idean Roohani, Tayla Moshal, Elizabeth M Boudiab, Eloise W Stanton, Paige Zachary, Jessica Lo, Joseph N Carey, David A Daar","doi":"10.1055/a-2331-8174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Historically, the use of intraoperative vasopressors during free flap lower extremity (LE) reconstruction has been proposed to adversely affect flap survival due to concerns about compromising flap perfusion. This study aims to analyze the impact of intraoperative vasopressor use and fluid administration on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing traumatic LE reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Patients who underwent LE free flap reconstruction between 2015 and 2023 at a Level I Trauma Center were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between vasopressor use and intraoperative fluids with partial/complete flap necrosis, as well as the differential effect of vasopressor use on flap outcomes based on varying fluid levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 105 LE flaps were performed over 8 years. Vasopressors were administered intraoperatively to 19 (18.0%) cases. Overall flap survival and limb salvage rates were 97.1 and 93.3%, respectively. Intraoperative vasopressor use decreased the overall risk of postoperative flap necrosis (OR 0.00005, 95% CI [9.11 × 10<sup>-9</sup>-0.285], <i>p</i> = 0.025), while a lower net fluid balance increased the risk of this outcome (OR 0.9985, 95% CI [0.9975-0.9996], <i>p</i> = 0.007). Further interaction analysis revealed that vasopressor use increased the risk of flap necrosis in settings with a higher net fluid balance (OR 1.0032, 95% CI [1.0008-1.0056], <i>p</i>-interaction =0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study demonstrated that intraoperative vasopressor use and adequate fluid status may be beneficial in improving flap outcomes in LE reconstruction. Vasopressor use with adequate fluid management can optimize hemodynamic stability when necessary during traumatic LE microvascular reconstruction without concern for increased risk of flap ischemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":"191-200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2331-8174","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Historically, the use of intraoperative vasopressors during free flap lower extremity (LE) reconstruction has been proposed to adversely affect flap survival due to concerns about compromising flap perfusion. This study aims to analyze the impact of intraoperative vasopressor use and fluid administration on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing traumatic LE reconstruction.
Methods: Patients who underwent LE free flap reconstruction between 2015 and 2023 at a Level I Trauma Center were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between vasopressor use and intraoperative fluids with partial/complete flap necrosis, as well as the differential effect of vasopressor use on flap outcomes based on varying fluid levels.
Results: A total of 105 LE flaps were performed over 8 years. Vasopressors were administered intraoperatively to 19 (18.0%) cases. Overall flap survival and limb salvage rates were 97.1 and 93.3%, respectively. Intraoperative vasopressor use decreased the overall risk of postoperative flap necrosis (OR 0.00005, 95% CI [9.11 × 10-9-0.285], p = 0.025), while a lower net fluid balance increased the risk of this outcome (OR 0.9985, 95% CI [0.9975-0.9996], p = 0.007). Further interaction analysis revealed that vasopressor use increased the risk of flap necrosis in settings with a higher net fluid balance (OR 1.0032, 95% CI [1.0008-1.0056], p-interaction =0.010).
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that intraoperative vasopressor use and adequate fluid status may be beneficial in improving flap outcomes in LE reconstruction. Vasopressor use with adequate fluid management can optimize hemodynamic stability when necessary during traumatic LE microvascular reconstruction without concern for increased risk of flap ischemia.
导言:从历史上看,在下肢游离皮瓣重建术中使用血管加压剂会对皮瓣存活率产生不利影响,因为人们担心会影响皮瓣灌注。本研究旨在分析创伤性下肢(LE)重建术患者术中使用血管加压药和输液对术后效果的影响:回顾性研究了2015-2023年间在一级创伤中心接受下肢游离皮瓣重建术的患者。研究人员进行了统计分析,以评估使用血管加压药和术中输液与皮瓣部分/完全坏死之间的关联,以及使用血管加压药对不同输液水平的皮瓣结果的不同影响:结果:在8年时间里,共进行了105例LE皮瓣手术。19例(18.0%)术中使用了血管加压剂。皮瓣总存活率和肢体挽救率分别为97.1%和93.3%。术中使用血管加压剂降低了术后皮瓣坏死的总体风险(OR 0.00005,95% CI [9.11x10-9-0.285],p=0.025),而较低的净液体平衡则增加了这一结果的风险(OR 0.9985,95% CI [0.9975-0.9996],p=0.007)。进一步的交互分析显示,在净体液平衡较高的情况下,使用血管加压剂会增加皮瓣坏死的风险(OR 1.0032,95% CI [1.0008-1.0056],p-交互=0.010):本研究表明,术中使用血管加压素和充足的体液状态可能有利于改善左侧肢体重建的皮瓣预后。在创伤性左侧肢体微血管重建过程中,必要时使用血管加压素并进行充分的液体管理可优化血流动力学稳定性,而无需担心皮瓣缺血风险的增加。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers.
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases.
The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.