Effectiveness of selected small group teaching methods for undergraduate medical students on basic concepts of epidemiology: A quasi-experimental study.

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-04-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1046_23
Jyothi Vasudevan, Lalithambigai Chellamuthu, Lokeshmaran Anandaraj, Ajith Kumar Chalil
{"title":"Effectiveness of selected small group teaching methods for undergraduate medical students on basic concepts of epidemiology: A quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Jyothi Vasudevan, Lalithambigai Chellamuthu, Lokeshmaran Anandaraj, Ajith Kumar Chalil","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1046_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Teaching epidemiology to young medical students using traditional teaching techniques is fraught with myriad challenges. Incorporating innovative small group teaching (SGT) approaches that promote active learning, practical application, and critical thinking can help in overcoming these challenges.</p><p><strong>Aim/objective: </strong>To identify the most effective SGT method from selected three approaches [tutorial technique (TT), problem-based learning (PBL), and fishbowl technique (FBT)] to teach the basic concepts of epidemiology to the third-year undergraduate medical students of a private medical college in Puducherry, Southern India.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental study was conducted among third-year undergraduate medical students for 6 months. The sample size was calculated to be 60 using the nMaster 2.0 sample size software. Three groups were formed with 20 students each. A pre-test, which included fifty multiple-choice questions covering topic one, was conducted for students in all three groups. An SGT session on topic one (dynamics of disease transmission) was held on the same day by different facilitators for three groups A, B, and C using the TT, PBL, and FBT, respectively. After 6 weeks of the SGT session for topic one, a post-test using the same questions was organized for all three groups to identify the effectiveness of each SGT method. The above sequence of events was followed for topic two (study designs) and topic three (investigation of disease outbreak) among all groups in the subsequent months. A written informed consent was sought from all students. The collected data was entered in MS Excel 2010 and analyzed using SPSS 21. The pre- and post-tests for all topics in all three groups were compared using a paired <i>t</i>-test, and an ANOVA test was used to find any difference between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean post-test score in each of the three groups for all topics had improved when compared with the mean pre-test score, which was significantly different between the three groups. Further, the mean score of group B (PBL group) was found to be higher than group C (FBT) but not significantly higher compared to group A (TT). The mean score of the feedback where the participants were asked to rate the overall session was found to be high in group B (PBL) followed by group A (TT).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBL and TT were found to be an equally effective way of small group methods for teaching-learning epidemiology in medical school.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1046_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Teaching epidemiology to young medical students using traditional teaching techniques is fraught with myriad challenges. Incorporating innovative small group teaching (SGT) approaches that promote active learning, practical application, and critical thinking can help in overcoming these challenges.

Aim/objective: To identify the most effective SGT method from selected three approaches [tutorial technique (TT), problem-based learning (PBL), and fishbowl technique (FBT)] to teach the basic concepts of epidemiology to the third-year undergraduate medical students of a private medical college in Puducherry, Southern India.

Materials and methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted among third-year undergraduate medical students for 6 months. The sample size was calculated to be 60 using the nMaster 2.0 sample size software. Three groups were formed with 20 students each. A pre-test, which included fifty multiple-choice questions covering topic one, was conducted for students in all three groups. An SGT session on topic one (dynamics of disease transmission) was held on the same day by different facilitators for three groups A, B, and C using the TT, PBL, and FBT, respectively. After 6 weeks of the SGT session for topic one, a post-test using the same questions was organized for all three groups to identify the effectiveness of each SGT method. The above sequence of events was followed for topic two (study designs) and topic three (investigation of disease outbreak) among all groups in the subsequent months. A written informed consent was sought from all students. The collected data was entered in MS Excel 2010 and analyzed using SPSS 21. The pre- and post-tests for all topics in all three groups were compared using a paired t-test, and an ANOVA test was used to find any difference between the groups.

Results: The mean post-test score in each of the three groups for all topics had improved when compared with the mean pre-test score, which was significantly different between the three groups. Further, the mean score of group B (PBL group) was found to be higher than group C (FBT) but not significantly higher compared to group A (TT). The mean score of the feedback where the participants were asked to rate the overall session was found to be high in group B (PBL) followed by group A (TT).

Conclusion: PBL and TT were found to be an equally effective way of small group methods for teaching-learning epidemiology in medical school.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对医学本科生流行病学基本概念的选定小组教学方法的有效性:一项准实验研究。
背景:使用传统教学技巧向年轻医科学生教授流行病学充满了无数挑战。采用创新的小组教学(SGT)方法,促进学生主动学习、实际应用和批判性思维,有助于克服这些挑战:从选定的三种方法(辅导技术(TT)、基于问题的学习(PBL)和鱼缸技术(FBT))中找出最有效的 SGT 方法,用于向印度南部普杜切里一所私立医学院的三年级本科生教授流行病学的基本概念:在医学院三年级本科生中开展了为期 6 个月的准实验研究。使用 nMaster 2.0 样本量软件计算出样本量为 60 个。共分三组,每组 20 人。三个小组的学生都进行了一次前测,其中包括 50 道涉及题目一的多项选择题。同一天,由不同的主持人分别采用 TT、PBL 和 FBT 为 A、B、C 三组学生举办了主题一(疾病传播动态)的 SGT 课程。在主题一的 SGT 课程结束 6 周后,组织所有三个小组使用相同的问题进行了一次后测 试,以确定每种 SGT 方法的有效性。在随后的几个月中,所有小组的课题二(研究设计)和课题三(疾病爆发调查)都按照上述顺序进行。所有学生都提交了知情同意书。收集的数据输入 MS Excel 2010,并使用 SPSS 21 进行分析。使用配对 t 检验比较三个组所有题目的前后测验,并使用方差分析检验找出组间差异:结果:与测试前的平均分相比,三组所有题目的测试后平均分都有所提高,三组之间存在显著差异。此外,B 组(PBL 组)的平均得分高于 C 组(FBT 组),但与 A 组(TT 组)相比没有明显提高。在要求学员对整个课程进行评分的反馈中,发现 B 组(PBL)的平均分较高,其次是 A 组(TT):结论:在医学院流行病学教学中,PBL 和 TT 是同样有效的小组教学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of training nursing process using the concept map on caring self-efficacy of nursing students in pediatric departments. Ethical and moral principles for oncology healthcare workers: A brief report from a Bioethics consortium emphasizing on need for education. Evaluation of antenatal care utilization and its effects on obstetric and newborn outcomes at a public and private hospital of Karnataka: A comparative study. Factors influencing knowledge sharing between scientific specialists in knowledge networks and communities of practice: A systematic literature review. Home-based supportive and health care services based on functional ability in older adults in Iran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1