The fringe benefits of fringe benefits: When firms borrow from their retirement providers

IF 7.2 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Corporate Finance Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102595
Connor L. Kasten
{"title":"The fringe benefits of fringe benefits: When firms borrow from their retirement providers","authors":"Connor L. Kasten","doi":"10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>I test whether retirement plan providers extend preferential corporate loan terms to firms that have an overlapping retirement plan relationship. I find that loans from affiliated retirement plan providers (i.e., relationship loans) have lower spreads than non-relationship loans. Relationship loans are also larger and exhibit longer maturities. These terms benefit shareholders without sacrificing the quality of retirement plans available to employees. The favorable terms within this banking relationship are most likely explained by the ability of retirement plan relationships to alleviate information asymmetries in the corporate loan market rather than a quid pro quo arrangement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15525,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Finance","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 102595"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929119924000579","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I test whether retirement plan providers extend preferential corporate loan terms to firms that have an overlapping retirement plan relationship. I find that loans from affiliated retirement plan providers (i.e., relationship loans) have lower spreads than non-relationship loans. Relationship loans are also larger and exhibit longer maturities. These terms benefit shareholders without sacrificing the quality of retirement plans available to employees. The favorable terms within this banking relationship are most likely explained by the ability of retirement plan relationships to alleviate information asymmetries in the corporate loan market rather than a quid pro quo arrangement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
附带福利的附带福利:企业向退休服务提供者借款
我检验了退休计划提供者是否向有重叠退休计划关系的公司提供优惠的公司贷款条件。我发现,来自关联退休计划提供者的贷款(即关系贷款)的利差低于非关系贷款。关系贷款的规模更大,期限更长。这些条款既有利于股东,又不影响员工退休计划的质量。这种银行关系中的有利条件很可能是由于退休计划关系能够缓解企业贷款市场中的信息不对称,而不是一种交换安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Corporate Finance
Journal of Corporate Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Corporate Finance aims to publish high quality, original manuscripts that analyze issues related to corporate finance. Contributions can be of a theoretical, empirical, or clinical nature. Topical areas of interest include, but are not limited to: financial structure, payout policies, corporate restructuring, financial contracts, corporate governance arrangements, the economics of organizations, the influence of legal structures, and international financial management. Papers that apply asset pricing and microstructure analysis to corporate finance issues are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
The real impacts of third-party certification on green bond issuances: Evidence from the Chinese green bond market Private equity buyouts & firm exporting in crisis periods: Exploring a new channel Reserves regulation and the risk-taking channel Anti-collusion leniency legislations and IPO activity: Worldwide evidence Sibling co-management and cost of capital: Evidence from Chinese listed family firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1