Romario Martins Costa , Erica Maria Batista Araujo , Davila Esmelinda Oliveira Silva , Sandra Mara Barbosa Rocha , Aurenivia Bonifacio , Ricardo Silva Sousa , Arthur Prudencio de Araujo Pereira , Erika Valente de Medeiros , Edvaldo Sagrilo , José Oscar Lustosa de Oliveira Junior , Henrique Antunes de Souza , Ademir Sergio Ferreira Araujo
{"title":"Seasonal responses of soil microbial biomass C and enzymatic activity comparing no-tillage and integrated crop-livestock systems","authors":"Romario Martins Costa , Erica Maria Batista Araujo , Davila Esmelinda Oliveira Silva , Sandra Mara Barbosa Rocha , Aurenivia Bonifacio , Ricardo Silva Sousa , Arthur Prudencio de Araujo Pereira , Erika Valente de Medeiros , Edvaldo Sagrilo , José Oscar Lustosa de Oliveira Junior , Henrique Antunes de Souza , Ademir Sergio Ferreira Araujo","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainable agricultural systems, such as integrated crop-livestock (ICL) and no-tillage (NT), aim to sustainably produce crops and livestock while simultaneously conserving soil and its microbial properties, mainly in tropical regions. However, little is known about how microbial properties respond seasonally to management applied in NT and ICL. Thus, this study assessed the seasonal responses of soil microbial biomass C and enzymatic activity comparing both NT and ICL. The experimental area, under a block design with four replicates, with both NT and ICL management, was implemented in December 2022 on Yellow Argisol soil in Maranhao state, Brazil. Soil samples were collected (0–20 cm depth) in March, June, September, December, and March (2023). The results showed an effect size varying between 0.06 and 0.95 for agricultural systems, and 0.63 to 0.95 for sampling time. For the interaction between agricultural systems and sampling time, the effect size was superior to 0.86. NT showed initially higher microbial biomass C (∼50 %), leveling with ICL by the end of the sampling period. Phosphatase and dehydrogenase increased in ICL from March to June (∼200 % and ∼700 % for phosphatase and dehydrogenase, respectively), while fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis fluctuated in NT. Urease was higher (∼100 %) during all sampling times in NT. Linear discriminant analysis revealed distinct responses across sampling times, with a positive effect of pH on enzymatic activity in both systems and soil moisture and P impacting positively on microbial biomass in ICL. Our results revealed significant seasonal responses of soil microbial biomass and enzymatic activity comparing NT and ICL, but with distinct responses to agricultural systems. The study showed seasonal variation of soil microbial biomass and enzymatic activity dependent on the characteristics of NT and ICL. Therefore, understanding these differences helps farmers make better decisions for healthier soil and better crops.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103628"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556324000347","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sustainable agricultural systems, such as integrated crop-livestock (ICL) and no-tillage (NT), aim to sustainably produce crops and livestock while simultaneously conserving soil and its microbial properties, mainly in tropical regions. However, little is known about how microbial properties respond seasonally to management applied in NT and ICL. Thus, this study assessed the seasonal responses of soil microbial biomass C and enzymatic activity comparing both NT and ICL. The experimental area, under a block design with four replicates, with both NT and ICL management, was implemented in December 2022 on Yellow Argisol soil in Maranhao state, Brazil. Soil samples were collected (0–20 cm depth) in March, June, September, December, and March (2023). The results showed an effect size varying between 0.06 and 0.95 for agricultural systems, and 0.63 to 0.95 for sampling time. For the interaction between agricultural systems and sampling time, the effect size was superior to 0.86. NT showed initially higher microbial biomass C (∼50 %), leveling with ICL by the end of the sampling period. Phosphatase and dehydrogenase increased in ICL from March to June (∼200 % and ∼700 % for phosphatase and dehydrogenase, respectively), while fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis fluctuated in NT. Urease was higher (∼100 %) during all sampling times in NT. Linear discriminant analysis revealed distinct responses across sampling times, with a positive effect of pH on enzymatic activity in both systems and soil moisture and P impacting positively on microbial biomass in ICL. Our results revealed significant seasonal responses of soil microbial biomass and enzymatic activity comparing NT and ICL, but with distinct responses to agricultural systems. The study showed seasonal variation of soil microbial biomass and enzymatic activity dependent on the characteristics of NT and ICL. Therefore, understanding these differences helps farmers make better decisions for healthier soil and better crops.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.