Embedding Assessment Literacy Can Enhance Graduate Attribute Development in a Biomedical Sciences Curriculum

Kevin A. Robertson, Kirsty J. Hughes, Susan M. Rhind
{"title":"Embedding Assessment Literacy Can Enhance Graduate Attribute Development in a Biomedical Sciences Curriculum","authors":"Kevin A. Robertson, Kirsty J. Hughes, Susan M. Rhind","doi":"10.3389/bjbs.2024.12229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the successful implementation of an assessment literacy strategy within a Biomedical Sciences degree. Teaching was aligned with an assessment literacy framework and aimed to prepare undergraduates for a literature comprehension assessment. Students were introduced to the assessment purpose and an adapted Miller’s pyramid model illustrated how the assessment contributed to competency development during their degree. Students read primary research papers and answered questions relating to the publications. They were then introduced to the processes of assessment and collaboratively graded answers of different standards. Finally, student and faculty grades were compared, differences considered, and key characteristics of answers discussed. Most students reported that they understood more about assessment standards than prior to the intervention [139/159 (87.4%)] and felt it had helped prepare them for their exam [138/159 (86.8%)]. The majority also reported they had increased confidence in evaluating data [118/159 (74%)], communicating their reasoning [113/159 (71%)] and considering what a reader needs to know [127/159 (79.9%)]. Students were asked to state the most important thing they had learned from the assessment literacy teaching. Notably, no responses referred to domain-specific knowledge. 129 free text responses were mapped to the University of Edinburgh graduate attribute framework. 93 (72%) statements mapped to the graduate attribute category “Research and Enquiry,” 66 (51.16%) mapped to “Communication” and 21 (16.27%) mapped to “Personal and Intellectual Autonomy.” To explore any longer-term impact of the assessment literacy teaching, a focus group was held with students from the same cohort, 2 years after the original intervention. Themes from this part of the study included that teaching had provided insights into standards and expectations for the assessment and the benefits of domain specific knowledge. A variety of aspects related to graduate attributes were also identified. Here, assessment literacy as a vehicle for graduate attribute development was an unexpected outcome. We propose that by explicitly engaging students with purpose, process, standards, and expectations, assessment literacy strategies may be used to successfully raise awareness of developmental progression, and enhance skills, aptitudes, and dispositions beneficial to Biomedical Sciences academic achievement and life after university.","PeriodicalId":505701,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","volume":"3 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.12229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes the successful implementation of an assessment literacy strategy within a Biomedical Sciences degree. Teaching was aligned with an assessment literacy framework and aimed to prepare undergraduates for a literature comprehension assessment. Students were introduced to the assessment purpose and an adapted Miller’s pyramid model illustrated how the assessment contributed to competency development during their degree. Students read primary research papers and answered questions relating to the publications. They were then introduced to the processes of assessment and collaboratively graded answers of different standards. Finally, student and faculty grades were compared, differences considered, and key characteristics of answers discussed. Most students reported that they understood more about assessment standards than prior to the intervention [139/159 (87.4%)] and felt it had helped prepare them for their exam [138/159 (86.8%)]. The majority also reported they had increased confidence in evaluating data [118/159 (74%)], communicating their reasoning [113/159 (71%)] and considering what a reader needs to know [127/159 (79.9%)]. Students were asked to state the most important thing they had learned from the assessment literacy teaching. Notably, no responses referred to domain-specific knowledge. 129 free text responses were mapped to the University of Edinburgh graduate attribute framework. 93 (72%) statements mapped to the graduate attribute category “Research and Enquiry,” 66 (51.16%) mapped to “Communication” and 21 (16.27%) mapped to “Personal and Intellectual Autonomy.” To explore any longer-term impact of the assessment literacy teaching, a focus group was held with students from the same cohort, 2 years after the original intervention. Themes from this part of the study included that teaching had provided insights into standards and expectations for the assessment and the benefits of domain specific knowledge. A variety of aspects related to graduate attributes were also identified. Here, assessment literacy as a vehicle for graduate attribute development was an unexpected outcome. We propose that by explicitly engaging students with purpose, process, standards, and expectations, assessment literacy strategies may be used to successfully raise awareness of developmental progression, and enhance skills, aptitudes, and dispositions beneficial to Biomedical Sciences academic achievement and life after university.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在生物医学课程中融入评估素养可促进毕业生的特质发展
本文介绍了在生物医学学位课程中成功实施评估素养策略的情况。教学与评估素养框架保持一致,旨在让本科生为文献理解评估做好准备。向学生们介绍了评估的目的,并通过改编的米勒金字塔模型说明了评估如何促进学生在攻读学位期间的能力发展。学生们阅读了初级研究论文,并回答了与出版物相关的问题。然后,向他们介绍了评估过程,并共同为不同标准的答案打分。最后,比较学生和教师的成绩,考虑差异,并讨论答案的关键特征。大多数学生表示,与干预前相比,他们对评估标准有了更多的了解[139/159 (87.4%)],并认为干预有助于他们为考试做好准备[138/159 (86.8%)]。大多数学生还表示,他们在评估数据[118/159 (74%)]、交流推理[113/159 (71%)]和考虑读者需要知道什么[127/159 (79.9%)]方面增强了信心。学生被要求说出他们从评估素养教学中学到的最重要的东西。值得注意的是,没有回答涉及特定领域的知识。129 个自由文本回答与爱丁堡大学毕业生属性框架进行了映射。其中 93 条(72%)的陈述与毕业生的特质类别 "研究与探究 "相吻合,66 条(51.16%)与 "交流 "相吻合,21 条(16.27%)与 "个人与智力自主 "相吻合。为了探究评估素养教学的长期影响,在最初的干预措施实施两年后,我们与同一批次的学生进行了一次焦点小组讨论。这部分研究的主题包括:教学让学生了解了评估的标准和期望,以及特定领域知识的益处。此外,还确定了与毕业生特质相关的多个方面。在这里,评估素养作为毕业生特质发展的载体是一个意想不到的结果。我们建议,通过让学生明确参与评估的目的、过程、标准和期望,评估素养策略可以成功地提高学生对发展进程的认识,增强学生的技能、能力和处置能力,从而有利于生物医学科学的学术成就和大学毕业后的生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chest CT Findings at Six Months Following COVID-19 ARDS – Correlation With the mMRC Dyspnea Scale and Pulmonary Function Tests Identification of a Theory-Practice Gap in the Education of Biomedical Scientists Embedding Assessment Literacy Can Enhance Graduate Attribute Development in a Biomedical Sciences Curriculum Case Report of a Hidden Intruder—Extremely Rare Presentation of Hydatidosis as a Nuchal Tumoural Mass Double Immunohistochemical Labelling of PRAME and Melan A in Slow Mohs Biopsy Margin Assessment of Lentigo Maligna and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1