Chest CT Findings at Six Months Following COVID-19 ARDS – Correlation With the mMRC Dyspnea Scale and Pulmonary Function Tests

M. Garg, Nidhi Prabhakar, Shritik Devkota, S. Dhooria, U. Debi, Ashish Dua, Tarvinder Singh, Muniraju Malarakunte, Harsimran Bhatia, M. Sandhu
{"title":"Chest CT Findings at Six Months Following COVID-19 ARDS – Correlation With the mMRC Dyspnea Scale and Pulmonary Function Tests","authors":"M. Garg, Nidhi Prabhakar, Shritik Devkota, S. Dhooria, U. Debi, Ashish Dua, Tarvinder Singh, Muniraju Malarakunte, Harsimran Bhatia, M. Sandhu","doi":"10.3389/bjbs.2024.12871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Many survivors of severe COVID-19 pneumonia experience lingering respiratory issues. There is limited research on follow-up chest imaging findings in patients with COVID-19 ARDS, particularly in relation to their mMRC dyspnea scores and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). This study addresses this gap by investigating the clinical characteristics, mMRC dyspnea scores, PFTs, and chest CT findings of COVID-19 ARDS patients at the 6 months post-recovery. By analyzing these variables together, we aim to gain a better understanding of the long-term health consequences of COVID-19 ARDS.Methods: This prospective observational study included 56 subjects with COVID-19 ARDS with dyspnea at the six-month follow-up visits. These patients were evaluated by chest CT, mMRC dyspnea scale, and PFT. The CT severity score was calculated individually for each of the four major imaging findings - ground glass opacities (GGOs), parenchymal/atelectatic bands, reticulations/septal thickening, and consolidation - using a modified CT severity scoring system. Statistics were carried out to find any association between individual CT chest findings and the mMRC dyspnea scale and forced vital capacity (FVC). p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.Results: Our study population had a mean age of 55.86 ± 9.60 years, with 44 (78.6%) being men. Grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 on the mMRC dyspnea scale were seen in 57.1%, 30.4%, 10.7%, and 1.8% of patients respectively. Common CT findings observed were GGOs (94.6%), reticulations/septal thickening (96.4%), parenchymal/atelectatic bands (92.8%), and consolidation (14.3%). The mean modified CT severity scores for GGOs, reticulations/septal thickening, parenchymal/atelectatic bands, and consolidation were 10.32 ± 5.51 (range: 0–21), 7.66 ± 4.33 (range: 0–19), 4.77 ± 3.03 (range: 0–14) and 0.29 ± 0.91 (range 0–5) respectively. Reticulations/septal thickening (p = 0.0129) and parenchymal/atelectatic bands (p = 0.0453) were associated with an increased mMRC dyspnea scale. Parenchymal/atelectatic bands were also associated with abnormal FVC (<80%) (p = 0.0233).Conclusion: Six-month follow-up chest CTs of COVID-19 ARDS survivors with persistent respiratory problems showed a statistically significant relationship between increased mMRC dyspnea score and imaging patterns of reticulations/septal thickening and parenchymal/atelectatic bands; while parenchymal/atelectatic bands also showed a statistically significant correlation with reduced FVC.","PeriodicalId":505701,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.12871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many survivors of severe COVID-19 pneumonia experience lingering respiratory issues. There is limited research on follow-up chest imaging findings in patients with COVID-19 ARDS, particularly in relation to their mMRC dyspnea scores and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). This study addresses this gap by investigating the clinical characteristics, mMRC dyspnea scores, PFTs, and chest CT findings of COVID-19 ARDS patients at the 6 months post-recovery. By analyzing these variables together, we aim to gain a better understanding of the long-term health consequences of COVID-19 ARDS.Methods: This prospective observational study included 56 subjects with COVID-19 ARDS with dyspnea at the six-month follow-up visits. These patients were evaluated by chest CT, mMRC dyspnea scale, and PFT. The CT severity score was calculated individually for each of the four major imaging findings - ground glass opacities (GGOs), parenchymal/atelectatic bands, reticulations/septal thickening, and consolidation - using a modified CT severity scoring system. Statistics were carried out to find any association between individual CT chest findings and the mMRC dyspnea scale and forced vital capacity (FVC). p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.Results: Our study population had a mean age of 55.86 ± 9.60 years, with 44 (78.6%) being men. Grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 on the mMRC dyspnea scale were seen in 57.1%, 30.4%, 10.7%, and 1.8% of patients respectively. Common CT findings observed were GGOs (94.6%), reticulations/septal thickening (96.4%), parenchymal/atelectatic bands (92.8%), and consolidation (14.3%). The mean modified CT severity scores for GGOs, reticulations/septal thickening, parenchymal/atelectatic bands, and consolidation were 10.32 ± 5.51 (range: 0–21), 7.66 ± 4.33 (range: 0–19), 4.77 ± 3.03 (range: 0–14) and 0.29 ± 0.91 (range 0–5) respectively. Reticulations/septal thickening (p = 0.0129) and parenchymal/atelectatic bands (p = 0.0453) were associated with an increased mMRC dyspnea scale. Parenchymal/atelectatic bands were also associated with abnormal FVC (<80%) (p = 0.0233).Conclusion: Six-month follow-up chest CTs of COVID-19 ARDS survivors with persistent respiratory problems showed a statistically significant relationship between increased mMRC dyspnea score and imaging patterns of reticulations/septal thickening and parenchymal/atelectatic bands; while parenchymal/atelectatic bands also showed a statistically significant correlation with reduced FVC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 ARDS 六个月后的胸部 CT 结果 - 与 mMRC 呼吸困难量表和肺功能测试的相关性
背景:许多 COVID-19 重症肺炎的幸存者都有挥之不去的呼吸问题。有关 COVID-19 ARDS 患者的后续胸部成像结果,尤其是与他们的 mMRC 呼吸困难评分和肺功能测试 (PFT) 相关的研究非常有限。本研究通过调查 COVID-19 ARDS 患者康复后 6 个月的临床特征、mMRC 呼吸困难评分、PFTs 和胸部 CT 结果,填补了这一空白。通过综合分析这些变量,我们旨在更好地了解 COVID-19 ARDS 对健康的长期影响:这项前瞻性观察研究纳入了 56 名 COVID-19 ARDS 患者,他们在六个月的随访中均出现了呼吸困难。这些患者接受了胸部 CT、mMRC 呼吸困难量表和 PFT 评估。采用改良的 CT 严重程度评分系统,针对四种主要成像结果(磨玻璃不透光(GGOs)、实质/无电解质带、网状结构/隔膜增厚和合并症)分别计算 CT 严重程度评分。研究人员对各个胸部 CT 结果与 mMRC 呼吸困难量表和用力肺活量(FVC)之间的关系进行了统计:研究对象的平均年龄为 55.86 ± 9.60 岁,男性 44 人(78.6%)。57.1%、30.4%、10.7% 和 1.8%的患者出现 mMRC 呼吸困难量表 1、2、3 和 4 级。常见的 CT 发现有 GGOs(94.6%)、网状结构/隔膜增厚(96.4%)、实质/无电解质带(92.8%)和合并症(14.3%)。GGOs、网状结构/隔膜增厚、实质/副折射带和合并症的平均改良 CT 严重程度评分分别为 10.32 ± 5.51(范围:0-21)、7.66 ± 4.33(范围:0-19)、4.77 ± 3.03(范围:0-14)和 0.29 ± 0.91(范围:0-5)。网状结构/隔膜增厚(p = 0.0129)和实质/无折射带(p = 0.0453)与 mMRC 呼吸困难量表的增加有关。肺实质/无气带还与 FVC 异常(<80%)有关(p = 0.0233):结论:COVID-19 ARDS 存活者六个月的随访胸部 CT 显示,存在持续呼吸问题的患者的 mMRC 呼吸困难评分增加与网状结构/隔膜增厚和实质/副脑带的成像模式之间存在统计学意义上的显著关系;而实质/副脑带与 FVC 降低之间也存在统计学意义上的显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chest CT Findings at Six Months Following COVID-19 ARDS – Correlation With the mMRC Dyspnea Scale and Pulmonary Function Tests Identification of a Theory-Practice Gap in the Education of Biomedical Scientists Embedding Assessment Literacy Can Enhance Graduate Attribute Development in a Biomedical Sciences Curriculum Case Report of a Hidden Intruder—Extremely Rare Presentation of Hydatidosis as a Nuchal Tumoural Mass Double Immunohistochemical Labelling of PRAME and Melan A in Slow Mohs Biopsy Margin Assessment of Lentigo Maligna and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1