Comparative Study of Collagen Density, Fibroblast, and Neovascularization in Tracheal Defect Reconstruction with Primary Repair and External Oblique Muscle Aponeurosis Patch (A Novel Study with New Zealand Rabbit)

RadinHardika Kamal, PrianggaAdi Wiratama, MarjonoDwi Wibowo, DwiHari Susilo
{"title":"Comparative Study of Collagen Density, Fibroblast, and Neovascularization in Tracheal Defect Reconstruction with Primary Repair and External Oblique Muscle Aponeurosis Patch (A Novel Study with New Zealand Rabbit)","authors":"RadinHardika Kamal, PrianggaAdi Wiratama, MarjonoDwi Wibowo, DwiHari Susilo","doi":"10.37506/25bn1q54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The lack of ideal materials and the high incidence of complications make tracheal defect reconstruction challenging. The use of aponeurosis as a surgical patch and flap in reconstruction is not uncommon, but no studies had been conducted to analyse its use in tracheal defect reconstruction, though its effectivity in wound healing was significant in reconstruction of other organs. \nObjective: This study aims to compare collagen density, fibroblast expression, and neovascularization in tracheal defect reconstruction using primary suture and using external oblique muscle aponeurosis patch. \nMethods: This randomized control trial is a laboratory experimental study using male New Zealand white rabbits. Randomization was carried out with permuted block randomization into a control group (primary suture) and a treatment group (reconstruction with external oblique muscle aponeurosis patch). Mascroscopic and histopathological assessments were carried out 14 days after surgery. \nResults: We got homogeneous samples in both groups (9 samples each) in terms of age (p = 0.763), weight before procedure (p = 0.347), and weight after procedure (p = 0.536). Macroscopically, no wound dehiscence, pus, or inflammation at the surgical site in either the control or treatment groups. Histopathological analysis showed that there were no differences in collagen density (p = 1.00), fibroblast expression (p = 0.414), and neovascularization (p = 0.558) between the two groups. \nConclusion: It can be concluded that there are no differences in collagen density, fibroblast expression, and neovascularization in New Zealand rabbits with tracheal defect using primary suture and using external oblique muscle aponeurosis patch","PeriodicalId":113416,"journal":{"name":"International journal of contemporary surgery","volume":"57 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of contemporary surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/25bn1q54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The lack of ideal materials and the high incidence of complications make tracheal defect reconstruction challenging. The use of aponeurosis as a surgical patch and flap in reconstruction is not uncommon, but no studies had been conducted to analyse its use in tracheal defect reconstruction, though its effectivity in wound healing was significant in reconstruction of other organs. Objective: This study aims to compare collagen density, fibroblast expression, and neovascularization in tracheal defect reconstruction using primary suture and using external oblique muscle aponeurosis patch. Methods: This randomized control trial is a laboratory experimental study using male New Zealand white rabbits. Randomization was carried out with permuted block randomization into a control group (primary suture) and a treatment group (reconstruction with external oblique muscle aponeurosis patch). Mascroscopic and histopathological assessments were carried out 14 days after surgery. Results: We got homogeneous samples in both groups (9 samples each) in terms of age (p = 0.763), weight before procedure (p = 0.347), and weight after procedure (p = 0.536). Macroscopically, no wound dehiscence, pus, or inflammation at the surgical site in either the control or treatment groups. Histopathological analysis showed that there were no differences in collagen density (p = 1.00), fibroblast expression (p = 0.414), and neovascularization (p = 0.558) between the two groups. Conclusion: It can be concluded that there are no differences in collagen density, fibroblast expression, and neovascularization in New Zealand rabbits with tracheal defect using primary suture and using external oblique muscle aponeurosis patch
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气管缺损原位修复与外斜肌肌腱膜片重建中胶原蛋白密度、成纤维细胞和新生血管的比较研究(新西兰兔的一项新研究)
背景:由于缺乏理想的材料和并发症的高发生率,气管缺损重建具有挑战性。在气管缺损重建中,使用肌腱膜作为手术补片和皮瓣并不少见,但尚未有研究分析其在气管缺损重建中的应用,尽管其在其他器官重建中的伤口愈合效果显著。研究目的本研究旨在比较使用主缝线和使用外斜肌肌腱膜修补重建气管缺损时的胶原蛋白密度、成纤维细胞表达和新生血管情况。方法:本随机对照试验是一项使用雄性新西兰白兔进行的实验室实验研究。随机分为对照组(主要缝合)和治疗组(使用外斜肌肌腱膜片重建)。术后 14 天进行筋膜镜和组织病理学评估。结果:在年龄(p = 0.763)、术前体重(p = 0.347)和术后体重(p = 0.536)方面,我们在两组(各 9 个样本)中获得了相同的样本。从宏观上看,对照组和治疗组的手术部位均未出现伤口裂开、化脓或炎症。组织病理学分析表明,两组的胶原密度(p = 1.00)、成纤维细胞表达(p = 0.414)和新生血管(p = 0.558)均无差异。结论可以得出结论,新西兰兔气管缺损的胶原蛋白密度、成纤维细胞表达和新生血管没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Collagen Density, Fibroblast, and Neovascularization in Tracheal Defect Reconstruction with Primary Repair and External Oblique Muscle Aponeurosis Patch (A Novel Study with New Zealand Rabbit) Double Parathyroid Adenoma: Culprit Behind A Non- Functioning Kidney Role of Probiotics in Reducing GERD Effects of Immediate Post Operative Orthopaedic Rehabilitation in Lower Limb Open Reduction Internal Fixation’s Orthopaedic Surgeries to Reduce Fear Avoidance Behaviour and Early Ambulation To Study the Repair of Incisional Hernia by Preperitoneal Meshplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1