HETEROSKEDASTICITY ROBUST SPECIFICATION TESTING IN SPATIAL AUTOREGRESSION

Jungyoon Lee, Peter C. B. Phillips, Francesca Rossi
{"title":"HETEROSKEDASTICITY ROBUST SPECIFICATION TESTING IN SPATIAL AUTOREGRESSION","authors":"Jungyoon Lee, Peter C. B. Phillips, Francesca Rossi","doi":"10.1017/s0266466624000173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spatial autoregressive (SAR) and related models offer flexible yet parsimonious ways to model spatial and network interactions. SAR specifications typically rely on a particular parametric functional form and an exogenous choice of the so-called spatial weight matrix with only limited guidance from theory in making these specifications. Also, the choice of a SAR model over other alternatives, such as spatial Durbin (SD) or spatial lagged X (SLX) models, is often arbitrary, raising issues of potential specification error. To address such issues, this paper develops a new specification test within the SAR framework that can detect general forms of misspecification including that of the spatial weight matrix, the functional form and the model itself. The test is robust to the presence of heteroskedasticity of unknown form in the disturbances and the approach relates to the conditional moment test framework of Bierens ([1982, Journal of Econometrics 20, 105–134], [1990, Econometrica 58, 1443–1458]). The Bierens test is shown to be inconsistent in general against spatial alternatives and the new test introduces modifications to achieve test consistency in the spatial setting. A central element is the infinite-dimensional endogeneity induced by spatial linkages. This complexity is addressed by introducing a new component to the omnibus test that captures the effects of potential spatial matrix misspecification. With this modification, the approach leads to a simple pivotal test procedure with standard critical values that is the first test in the literature to have power against misspecifications in the spatial linkages. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the test under the null hypothesis of correct SAR specification and prove consistency. A Monte Carlo study is conducted to study its finite sample performance. An empirical illustration on the performance of the test in modeling tax competition in Finland is included.","PeriodicalId":502648,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Theory","volume":"126 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466624000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) and related models offer flexible yet parsimonious ways to model spatial and network interactions. SAR specifications typically rely on a particular parametric functional form and an exogenous choice of the so-called spatial weight matrix with only limited guidance from theory in making these specifications. Also, the choice of a SAR model over other alternatives, such as spatial Durbin (SD) or spatial lagged X (SLX) models, is often arbitrary, raising issues of potential specification error. To address such issues, this paper develops a new specification test within the SAR framework that can detect general forms of misspecification including that of the spatial weight matrix, the functional form and the model itself. The test is robust to the presence of heteroskedasticity of unknown form in the disturbances and the approach relates to the conditional moment test framework of Bierens ([1982, Journal of Econometrics 20, 105–134], [1990, Econometrica 58, 1443–1458]). The Bierens test is shown to be inconsistent in general against spatial alternatives and the new test introduces modifications to achieve test consistency in the spatial setting. A central element is the infinite-dimensional endogeneity induced by spatial linkages. This complexity is addressed by introducing a new component to the omnibus test that captures the effects of potential spatial matrix misspecification. With this modification, the approach leads to a simple pivotal test procedure with standard critical values that is the first test in the literature to have power against misspecifications in the spatial linkages. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the test under the null hypothesis of correct SAR specification and prove consistency. A Monte Carlo study is conducted to study its finite sample performance. An empirical illustration on the performance of the test in modeling tax competition in Finland is included.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空间自回归中的异方差稳健规范检验
空间自回归(SAR)及相关模型为空间和网络互动建模提供了灵活而简洁的方法。SAR 规范通常依赖于特定的参数函数形式和所谓空间权重矩阵的外生选择,在制定这些规范时只有有限的理论指导。此外,在空间杜宾模型(SD)或空间滞后 X 模型(SLX)等其他替代模型中选择 SAR 模型往往是任意的,从而引发了潜在的规范误差问题。为了解决这些问题,本文在 SAR 框架内开发了一种新的规范检验方法,可以检测出一般形式的规范错误,包括空间权重矩阵、函数形式和模型本身的规范错误。该检验对扰动中存在的未知形式的异方差具有鲁棒性,其方法与 Bierens 的条件矩检验框架有关([1982 年,《计量经济学杂志》20,105-134],[1990 年,《计量经济学》58,1443-1458])。比伦斯检验在一般情况下与空间检验不一致,新检验引入了一些修改,以实现空间检验的一致性。一个核心要素是空间联系引起的无限维内生性。为了解决这一复杂性,我们在综合测试中引入了一个新的组成部分,以捕捉潜在的空间矩阵规格错误的影响。通过这一修改,该方法产生了一个具有标准临界值的简单枢轴检验程序,这是文献中第一个对空间关联中的误规范具有威力的检验。我们推导了该检验在 SAR 规格正确的零假设下的渐近分布,并证明了其一致性。我们进行了蒙特卡罗研究,以研究其有限样本性能。此外,我们还对该检验在芬兰税收竞争模型中的表现进行了实证说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HETEROSKEDASTICITY ROBUST SPECIFICATION TESTING IN SPATIAL AUTOREGRESSION REAL ANALYTIC DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS OF DEMAND: THEORY AND IMPLICATIONS THE ECONOMETRIC THEORY AWARDS 2024 IDENTIFICATION ROBUST INFERENCE FOR MOMENTS-BASED ANALYSIS OF LINEAR DYNAMIC PANEL DATA MODELS – ADDENDUM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1