IN SEARCH OF EQUITY: ORISSAN TRIBAL HISTORIOGRAPHY’S SEARCH FOR JUSTICE AGAINST COLONIAL INJUSTICE

Baira Ganjan Dash
{"title":"IN SEARCH OF EQUITY: ORISSAN TRIBAL HISTORIOGRAPHY’S SEARCH FOR JUSTICE AGAINST COLONIAL INJUSTICE","authors":"Baira Ganjan Dash","doi":"10.54103/gjcpi.2024.23457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Before the development of subaltern historiography, history was always an elite pursuit. Subaltern historiography has played an important role in de-elitising history and bringing forth the facts of socio-economic aspects and political events during the colonial period. In colonial Orissa, there were numerous subaltern movements in general, and tribal insurgencies in particular, all aiming for some or other form of independence from the clutch of landed aristocracy, local rajas, or the British. Tribals played a significant political role in Orissa’s freedom struggle in 19th and 20th centuries. They were not at all backward in colonial Orissa’s prajamandal movements. But it is a farce that, even after a long interval, just a few tribal leaders have gained prominence in history, which shows a gap in political history and a grave intellectual injustice. Colonial historiography portrayed tribals as criminals and blind-believers with negative activities. But the influence of Marxist and Subaltern approach has changed the historiographical scenario in the post-independent phase, which is evidenced from the extensive studies on socio-economic and cultural life of the tribals. Despite extensive studies, political history of tribals has received less attention in comparison to socio-economic history. Similarly, the history of science and technological knowledge in proverbs, health care practices, animal husbandry have not yet explored. Travesty, we are obliged to rely exclusively on inadequate colonial documents, which appear to be biased, due to a lack of indigenous records. As a result, the need of oral source, vernacular sources and artefacts preserved in museums are felt significantly. Intensive research within the conceptual framework of an interdisciplinary approach is also required to learn more about their other aspects of life and for bringing an intellectual justice.","PeriodicalId":342668,"journal":{"name":"Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation","volume":"120 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/gjcpi.2024.23457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Before the development of subaltern historiography, history was always an elite pursuit. Subaltern historiography has played an important role in de-elitising history and bringing forth the facts of socio-economic aspects and political events during the colonial period. In colonial Orissa, there were numerous subaltern movements in general, and tribal insurgencies in particular, all aiming for some or other form of independence from the clutch of landed aristocracy, local rajas, or the British. Tribals played a significant political role in Orissa’s freedom struggle in 19th and 20th centuries. They were not at all backward in colonial Orissa’s prajamandal movements. But it is a farce that, even after a long interval, just a few tribal leaders have gained prominence in history, which shows a gap in political history and a grave intellectual injustice. Colonial historiography portrayed tribals as criminals and blind-believers with negative activities. But the influence of Marxist and Subaltern approach has changed the historiographical scenario in the post-independent phase, which is evidenced from the extensive studies on socio-economic and cultural life of the tribals. Despite extensive studies, political history of tribals has received less attention in comparison to socio-economic history. Similarly, the history of science and technological knowledge in proverbs, health care practices, animal husbandry have not yet explored. Travesty, we are obliged to rely exclusively on inadequate colonial documents, which appear to be biased, due to a lack of indigenous records. As a result, the need of oral source, vernacular sources and artefacts preserved in museums are felt significantly. Intensive research within the conceptual framework of an interdisciplinary approach is also required to learn more about their other aspects of life and for bringing an intellectual justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻求公平:奥里桑部落史学对殖民不公正的正义追寻
在发展次等史学之前,历史始终是精英的追求。次等史学在去精英化历史和揭示殖民时期社会经济方面和政治事件的事实方面发挥了重要作用。在殖民时期的奥里萨邦,次等运动层出不穷,特别是部落叛乱,其目的都是为了从土地贵族、地方酋长或英国人的控制下获得某种形式的独立。19 世纪和 20 世纪,部落在奥里萨邦的自由斗争中发挥了重要的政治作用。在殖民时期奥里萨邦的 prajamandal 运动中,他们一点也不落后。但是,即使时隔多年,也只有少数部落领袖在历史上崭露头角,这是一场闹剧,显示了政治史上的空白和思想上的严重不公。殖民史学将部落描绘成罪犯和盲目信仰者,他们的活动都是负面的。但是,在独立后阶段,马克思主义和次等方法的影响改变了史学的格局,对部落社会经济和文化生活的广泛研究就是证明。尽管进行了广泛的研究,但与社会经济史相比,部落的政治史受到的关注较少。同样,谚语、保健实践、畜牧业中的科学和技术知识史也尚未得到探讨。遗憾的是,由于缺乏本土记录,我们不得不完全依赖不充分的殖民文献,而这些文献似乎有失偏颇。因此,我们非常需要口述资料、乡土资料和保存在博物馆中的手工艺品。此外,还需要在跨学科方法的概念框架内开展深入研究,以更多地了解他们生活的其他方 面,并在思想上伸张正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WELL-BEING: THREATS AND ACHIEVEMENTS IN SEARCH OF EQUITY: ORISSAN TRIBAL HISTORIOGRAPHY’S SEARCH FOR JUSTICE AGAINST COLONIAL INJUSTICE LIFE CHANCES IN A (UN)SUSTAINABLE WORLD THE SPARŚA PROJECT: BUILDING A COMPREHENSIVE MENSTRUAL HEALTH MANAGEMENT INTERVENTION IN NEPAL EXPLORING COVID-19 AND SOCIAL CONFLICT IN AFRICA: NIGERIA AS A CASE STUDY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1