Morphological, Biochemical and Proline-Related Genes Analyses in Resistant and Susceptible Wheat Cultivars in Iraq

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.37077/25200860.2024.37.1.10
W. K. AL-Saadi, M. S. Hamdalla, W. Aljuaifari
{"title":"Morphological, Biochemical and Proline-Related Genes Analyses in Resistant and Susceptible Wheat Cultivars in Iraq","authors":"W. K. AL-Saadi, M. S. Hamdalla, W. Aljuaifari","doi":"10.37077/25200860.2024.37.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A high salinity level negatively affects the morpho-physiological parameters of plants. As a result of salinity, these effects are considered crucial signs of plant damage.  In this study, ten Iraqi wheat cultivars were examined against two salinity levels (3 and 15 ds m-1) and some morphological, biochemical properties were measured. Also proline-related genes were analyzed using Ilumina RNA sequences and bioinformatics analyses. All cultivars demonstrated a decrease in the studied parameters with an increase saliness. 'Dijlah' cultivar showed best performance salinity stress, while 'Ibaa 99' was sensitive based on morphological and biochemical parameters. The competition was in favor of the sodium ion at the expense of the potassium ion in high salinity conditions. Proline accumulation in wheat blade leaves was about 2.5 times higher at the peak salt level. The transcriptomic analysis was done and the transcripts per million (TPM) values were estimated for some proline genes. The genes of probable proline transporter 2, proline     dehydrogenase 2, and GSK-like kinase 1A obtained the higher TPM values in cultivar 'Dijlah' cultivar than in 'Ibaa 99' cultivar. It can be concluded that 'Dijlah' cultivar is a salt tolerant cultivar as compare with the susceptible 'Ibaa 99' cultivar, and their proline accumulation was increased with salinity stress and was related with TPM values.  Morphological, biochemical and TPM values would offer a good combined- criteria for recognition the tolerant genotype.","PeriodicalId":8700,"journal":{"name":"Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37077/25200860.2024.37.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A high salinity level negatively affects the morpho-physiological parameters of plants. As a result of salinity, these effects are considered crucial signs of plant damage.  In this study, ten Iraqi wheat cultivars were examined against two salinity levels (3 and 15 ds m-1) and some morphological, biochemical properties were measured. Also proline-related genes were analyzed using Ilumina RNA sequences and bioinformatics analyses. All cultivars demonstrated a decrease in the studied parameters with an increase saliness. 'Dijlah' cultivar showed best performance salinity stress, while 'Ibaa 99' was sensitive based on morphological and biochemical parameters. The competition was in favor of the sodium ion at the expense of the potassium ion in high salinity conditions. Proline accumulation in wheat blade leaves was about 2.5 times higher at the peak salt level. The transcriptomic analysis was done and the transcripts per million (TPM) values were estimated for some proline genes. The genes of probable proline transporter 2, proline     dehydrogenase 2, and GSK-like kinase 1A obtained the higher TPM values in cultivar 'Dijlah' cultivar than in 'Ibaa 99' cultivar. It can be concluded that 'Dijlah' cultivar is a salt tolerant cultivar as compare with the susceptible 'Ibaa 99' cultivar, and their proline accumulation was increased with salinity stress and was related with TPM values.  Morphological, biochemical and TPM values would offer a good combined- criteria for recognition the tolerant genotype.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊拉克抗病和易感小麦品种的形态学、生物化学和脯氨酸相关基因分析
高盐度会对植物的形态生理参数产生负面影响。这些影响被认为是盐度对植物造成损害的重要标志。 在这项研究中,十个伊拉克小麦栽培品种针对两种盐度水平(3 和 15 ds m-1)进行了研究,并测量了一些形态和生化特性。此外,还使用 Ilumina RNA 序列和生物信息学分析方法对脯氨酸相关基因进行了分析。随着盐度的增加,所有栽培品种的研究参数都有所下降。Dijlah "栽培品种在盐度胁迫下表现最好,而 "Ibaa 99 "在形态和生化参数上比较敏感。在高盐度条件下,竞争有利于钠离子,而不利于钾离子。在最高盐分水平下,小麦叶片中脯氨酸的积累量约为原来的 2.5 倍。对一些脯氨酸基因进行了转录组分析并估算了百万转录本(TPM)值。与'Ibaa 99'栽培品种相比,'Dijlah'栽培品种中可能的脯氨酸转运体 2、脯氨酸脱氢酶 2 和 GSK 样激酶 1A 的基因获得了更高的 TPM 值。由此可以得出结论,'Dijlah'栽培品种与易感的'Ibaa 99'栽培品种相比是耐盐栽培品种,它们的脯氨酸积累随盐度胁迫而增加,并与 TPM 值有关。 形态、生化和 TPM 值为识别耐盐基因型提供了一个很好的综合标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences
Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Investigation on Field Performance of Plowing and Harvesting Potatoes in Southern Baghdad Productive Performance, Hatching Egg Quality and Health Indices of Hisex Brown Laying Hens Fed Extruded Grain Amaranth Evaluating Land Suitability for Wheat Cultivation Criteria Analysis Fuzzy-AHP and Geospatial Techniques in Northern Basrah Governorate. Study of the Physical, Chemical, and Biologically Active Properties of Avocado Pulp (Persea americana), and Its Use in the Preparation of Some Functional Dairy Products Inhibitor Properties of Rue (Ruta graveolens L.) on Spermatogenesis in Guppy Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1