SECT and DECT coronarography

Tara Stojaković, Krešimir Dolić
{"title":"SECT and DECT coronarography","authors":"Tara Stojaković, Krešimir Dolić","doi":"10.55378/rv.48.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coronary artery disease is an atherosclerotic disease of the coronary arteries with consequent development of ischemic heart disease and is one of the leading causes of death in developed and developing countries. The “golden” standard in the diagnosis of coronary disease is invasive coronarography, but with the development of coronary CT angiography, a sub-millimetre precise assessment of the anatomy of coronary arteries and heart has been made possible. While in the earlier stages, SECT devices were used for the needs of coronary CT angiography with synchronization with the ECG, the development of DECT devices enabled a significant rise in the performance of coronary CT angiography in the form of a better assessment of anatomy and stenoses of the coronary arteries caused by plaque, the possibility of assessing heart perfusion, obtaining an image with a minimal amount of artifacts, a smaller amount of applied iodine contrast agent, better characterization of the atherosclerotic plaque and its components, and all of the above with a lower radiation dose for the patient. While most of the conducted research speaks in favour of DECT devices versus SECT devices, the issue of inadequate utilization of the numerous possibilities of DECT devices in everyday clinical practice remains. The DECT technique can be implemented in several ways, depending on the structure of the DECT device (on the number of radiation sources, the structure/arrangement of detectors, or the use of filters), but the question of which type of DECT technique/device to use depends on the disadvantages and advantages of individual devices as well as on the final goal of diagnostic procedures.","PeriodicalId":500956,"journal":{"name":"Radiološki vjesnik","volume":"124 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiološki vjesnik","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55378/rv.48.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronary artery disease is an atherosclerotic disease of the coronary arteries with consequent development of ischemic heart disease and is one of the leading causes of death in developed and developing countries. The “golden” standard in the diagnosis of coronary disease is invasive coronarography, but with the development of coronary CT angiography, a sub-millimetre precise assessment of the anatomy of coronary arteries and heart has been made possible. While in the earlier stages, SECT devices were used for the needs of coronary CT angiography with synchronization with the ECG, the development of DECT devices enabled a significant rise in the performance of coronary CT angiography in the form of a better assessment of anatomy and stenoses of the coronary arteries caused by plaque, the possibility of assessing heart perfusion, obtaining an image with a minimal amount of artifacts, a smaller amount of applied iodine contrast agent, better characterization of the atherosclerotic plaque and its components, and all of the above with a lower radiation dose for the patient. While most of the conducted research speaks in favour of DECT devices versus SECT devices, the issue of inadequate utilization of the numerous possibilities of DECT devices in everyday clinical practice remains. The DECT technique can be implemented in several ways, depending on the structure of the DECT device (on the number of radiation sources, the structure/arrangement of detectors, or the use of filters), but the question of which type of DECT technique/device to use depends on the disadvantages and advantages of individual devices as well as on the final goal of diagnostic procedures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SECT 和 DECT 冠状动脉造影
冠状动脉疾病是冠状动脉粥样硬化性疾病,会导致缺血性心脏病,是发达国家和发展中国家的主要死亡原因之一。诊断冠心病的 "黄金 "标准是有创冠状动脉造影术,但随着冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术的发展,亚毫米级精确评估冠状动脉和心脏解剖结构已成为可能。早期的冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术需要使用 SECT 设备,并与心电图同步,而 DECT 设备的开发使冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术的性能显著提高,能更好地评估解剖结构和斑块造成的冠状动脉狭窄、可以评估心脏灌注情况,获得伪影极少的图像,减少碘造影剂的用量,更好地描述动脉粥样硬化斑块及其成分,而且所有这些对病人的辐射剂量都更低。虽然大多数研究都认为 DECT 设备优于 SECT 设备,但在日常临床实践中,DECT 设备的多种可能性仍未得到充分利用。根据 DECT 设备的结构(辐射源的数量、探测器的结构/排列或滤波器的使用),DECT 技术可以通过多种方式实现,但使用哪种类型的 DECT 技术/设备取决于各个设备的优缺点以及诊断程序的最终目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Best Practice in Radiation Oncology — A Workshop to Train RTT Trainers Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Application in External Beam Radiotherapy SECT and DECT coronarography Pulmonary vein isolation by cryoablation on patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Optimization of diagnostic and interventional procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1