Resident level is associated with operative time in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Surgery in practice and science Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100251
Nada Lelovic , Rebecca Reif , Hanna Jensen , Adria Abella Villafranca , Mary Katherine Kimbrough , Kevin Sexton
{"title":"Resident level is associated with operative time in laparoscopic cholecystectomy","authors":"Nada Lelovic ,&nbsp;Rebecca Reif ,&nbsp;Hanna Jensen ,&nbsp;Adria Abella Villafranca ,&nbsp;Mary Katherine Kimbrough ,&nbsp;Kevin Sexton","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>While previous literature has shown that resident involvement increases operative time, the influence of resident involvement on operative time is generally not considered in current methods of case time predictions or operating room planning. Furthermore, evidence of prolonged case times based on the level of the assisting resident is yet scarce. We hypothesized that operative time would increase with the post-graduate year of assisting residents as they gain more autonomy in the operating room.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>This was an observational cohort study in which we retrospectively analyzed 802 laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases performed in a single academic institution between May 2014 and December 2020. Only cases in which a Post Graduate Year 1 to 5 (PGY) resident was assisting were included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>PGY1–4 residents had statistically significant positive time coefficient results in all linear regression models, except PGY2s in urgent cases. PGY-2 residents had the longest overall average case time of 98 min. Emergent cases were more likely to have prolonged case times.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The increased average case time associated with PGY-2 residents is likely due to a new level of increased autonomy in the operating room (OR) during this year of training. The linear regression results indicated PGY1–4 residents were more likely to have longer laparoscopic cholecystectomy operative times than the PGY5 residents, except PGY2s in urgent cases. This may reflect the accumulation of surgical skills at the PGY5 level. Resident involvement should be considered in the prediction of operative time in an academic setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000184/pdfft?md5=0dd64703d3d1e4780a5478a78c6a46ec&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000184-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While previous literature has shown that resident involvement increases operative time, the influence of resident involvement on operative time is generally not considered in current methods of case time predictions or operating room planning. Furthermore, evidence of prolonged case times based on the level of the assisting resident is yet scarce. We hypothesized that operative time would increase with the post-graduate year of assisting residents as they gain more autonomy in the operating room.

Study design

This was an observational cohort study in which we retrospectively analyzed 802 laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases performed in a single academic institution between May 2014 and December 2020. Only cases in which a Post Graduate Year 1 to 5 (PGY) resident was assisting were included.

Results

PGY1–4 residents had statistically significant positive time coefficient results in all linear regression models, except PGY2s in urgent cases. PGY-2 residents had the longest overall average case time of 98 min. Emergent cases were more likely to have prolonged case times.

Conclusions

The increased average case time associated with PGY-2 residents is likely due to a new level of increased autonomy in the operating room (OR) during this year of training. The linear regression results indicated PGY1–4 residents were more likely to have longer laparoscopic cholecystectomy operative times than the PGY5 residents, except PGY2s in urgent cases. This may reflect the accumulation of surgical skills at the PGY5 level. Resident involvement should be considered in the prediction of operative time in an academic setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院医师水平与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术时间有关
背景虽然以往的文献表明住院医师的参与会增加手术时间,但在目前的病例时间预测或手术室规划方法中,住院医师的参与对手术时间的影响通常并未被考虑在内。此外,根据协助住院医师的水平而延长病例时间的证据还很少。研究设计这是一项观察性队列研究,我们回顾性分析了 2014 年 5 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在一家学术机构进行的 802 例腹腔镜胆囊切除术病例。研究结果PGY1-4住院医师在所有线性回归模型中的时间系数结果均为统计学意义上的正数,但PGY2住院医师在急诊病例中除外。PGY2 级住院医师的病例总平均用时最长,为 98 分钟。结论PGY-2住院医师的平均病例时间增加可能是由于在这一年的培训中,手术室(OR)的自主性提高到了一个新的水平。线性回归结果显示,与 PGY5 住院医师相比,PGY1-4 住院医师的腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术时间更长,但 PGY2 住院医师的紧急病例除外。这可能反映了住院医师在 PGY5 阶段所积累的手术技能。在学术环境中预测手术时间时应考虑住院医师的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
期刊最新文献
Emergency laparotomy preoperative risk assessment tool performance: A systematic review Letter to the Editor on “The pulmonary contusion score: Development of asimple scoring system for blunt lung injury” Prevalence and associated factors of acute postoperative pain in adult surgical patients: A prospective study Advances and results in omental patch repair of gastrointestinal perforations: A narrative review Practical evaluation of risk factors in patients with osteoporosis-induced thoracic and lumbar vertebral compression fractures requiring surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1