Non-subjective artificial intelligence in the system of subject-object relations

Andrei Armovich Gribkov
{"title":"Non-subjective artificial intelligence in the system of subject-object relations","authors":"Andrei Armovich Gribkov","doi":"10.25136/2409-8728.2024.5.70817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Expansion of functional capabilities of artificial intelligence systems actualizes the question of the possibility of their autonomous activity aimed at cognition and creation of the world. A significant factor determining the properties of artificial intelligence is its subjectiveness. If the world is deterministic, its subjectiveness is not necessary to ensure the functionality of artificial intelligence. Subjectiveness, however, is necessary for the initialization of cognitive or creative activity. A reasonable question arises regarding the ability of non-subjective artificial intelligence to act as a subject of cognition. Studies show that two main forms of participation of non-subject artificial intelligence in the system of subject-object relations are possible: as part of an integrated subject of cognition, in which a human being-operator plays the leading role, or fully autonomous functioning of artificial intelligence initialized (formalized or non-formalized) by the tasks of satisfying human being's needs. The analysis of the properties of cognition by means of artificial intelligence and other cognitive systems shows that the ability to act as a subject of cognition is formed not at the formation of subjectness, but at a lower level - the level of formation of self-consciousness, available to relatively uncomplicated cognitive systems, both natural and artificial. The conclusion about the direct connection between self-consciousness and the ability to cognize follows from the definition of cognition in the logic of subject-object opposition, corresponding to the epistemological interpretation of subject-object relations. However, an alternative ontological interpretation is also possible, which identifies being and consciousness. Such an idealistic understanding of the world corresponds to the philosophy of irrationalism, in the framework of which a reliable answer to the question of the necessity of subjectiveness for solving intellectual problems cannot be obtained.\n","PeriodicalId":509672,"journal":{"name":"Философская мысль","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Философская мысль","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2024.5.70817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Expansion of functional capabilities of artificial intelligence systems actualizes the question of the possibility of their autonomous activity aimed at cognition and creation of the world. A significant factor determining the properties of artificial intelligence is its subjectiveness. If the world is deterministic, its subjectiveness is not necessary to ensure the functionality of artificial intelligence. Subjectiveness, however, is necessary for the initialization of cognitive or creative activity. A reasonable question arises regarding the ability of non-subjective artificial intelligence to act as a subject of cognition. Studies show that two main forms of participation of non-subject artificial intelligence in the system of subject-object relations are possible: as part of an integrated subject of cognition, in which a human being-operator plays the leading role, or fully autonomous functioning of artificial intelligence initialized (formalized or non-formalized) by the tasks of satisfying human being's needs. The analysis of the properties of cognition by means of artificial intelligence and other cognitive systems shows that the ability to act as a subject of cognition is formed not at the formation of subjectness, but at a lower level - the level of formation of self-consciousness, available to relatively uncomplicated cognitive systems, both natural and artificial. The conclusion about the direct connection between self-consciousness and the ability to cognize follows from the definition of cognition in the logic of subject-object opposition, corresponding to the epistemological interpretation of subject-object relations. However, an alternative ontological interpretation is also possible, which identifies being and consciousness. Such an idealistic understanding of the world corresponds to the philosophy of irrationalism, in the framework of which a reliable answer to the question of the necessity of subjectiveness for solving intellectual problems cannot be obtained.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主客体关系系统中的非主体人工智能
人工智能系统功能的扩展使其认知和创造世界的自主活动的可能性成为现实。决定人工智能特性的一个重要因素是其主观性。如果世界是确定的,那么它的主观性就不是确保人工智能功能的必要条件。然而,主观性对于认知或创造活动的初始化却是必要的。关于非主体性人工智能作为认知主体的能力,出现了一个合理的问题。研究表明,非主体人工智能参与主客体关系系统的两种主要形式是可能的:作为综合认知主体的一部分,其中人类操作者起主导作用;或者人工智能通过满足人类需求的任务初始化(形式化或非形式化),完全自主地发挥作用。对人工智能和其他认知系统的认知特性的分析表明,作为认知主体的能力不是在主体性的形成过程中形成的,而是在较低层次--自我意识的形成过程中形成的。关于自我意识与认知能力之间直接联系的结论,是根据主客体对立逻辑中的认知定义得出的,与主客体关系的认识论解释相对应。然而,本体论的另一种解释也是可能的,它将存在与意识相提并论。这种对世界的唯心主义理解对应于非理性主义哲学,在非理性主义哲学的框架内,无法对主观性对于解决知识问题的必要性问题给出可靠的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cybersecurity and the Evolution of the information space: a phenomenological analysis of the relationship with the metaverse and the digital world Modern Utopia: Yuval Noah Harari Non-subjective artificial intelligence in the system of subject-object relations The relationship of human rights and freedoms in the context of justice The experimental method of G. Galileo in the context of the formation of the concept of the subject in the philosophy of the Modern Times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1