Bayesian optimization-enhanced ensemble learning for the uniaxial compressive strength prediction of natural rock and its application

{"title":"Bayesian optimization-enhanced ensemble learning for the uniaxial compressive strength prediction of natural rock and its application","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ghm.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Engineering disasters, such as rockburst and collapse, are closely related to structural instability caused by insufficient bearing capacity of geological materials. Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) holds considerable significance in rock engineering projects. Consequently, this study endeavors to devise efficient models for the expeditious and economical estimation of UCS. Using a dataset of 729 samples, including the Schmidt hammer rebound number, P-wave velocity, and point load index data, we evaluated six algorithms, namely Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Random Forest (RF), and Extra Trees (ET) and utilized Bayesian Optimization (BO) to optimize the aforementioned algorithms. Moreover, we applied model evaluation metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Variance Accounted For (VAF), Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Weighted Mean Absolute Percentage Error (WMAPE), Coefficient of Correlation (<em>R</em>), and Coefficient of Determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>). Among the six models, BO-ET emerged as the most optimal performer during training (RMSE ​= ​4.5042, MAE ​= ​3.2328, VAF ​= ​0.9898, NSE ​= ​0.9898, WMAPE ​= ​0.0538, R ​= ​0.9955, <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> ​= ​0.9898) and testing (RMSE ​= ​4.8234, MAE ​= ​3.9737, VAF ​= ​0.9881, NSE ​= ​0.9875, WMAPE ​= ​0.2515, <em>R</em> ​= ​0.9940, <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> ​= ​0.9875) phases. Additionally, we conducted a systematic comparison between ensemble and traditional single machine learning models such as decision tree, support vector machine, and K-Nearest Neighbors, thus highlighting the advantages of ensemble learning. Furthermore, the enhancement effect of BO on generalization performance was assessed. Finally, a BO-ET-based Graphical User Interface (GUI) system was developed and validated in a Tunnel Boring Machine-excavated tunnel.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100580,"journal":{"name":"Geohazard Mechanics","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 197-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohazard Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294974182400027X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engineering disasters, such as rockburst and collapse, are closely related to structural instability caused by insufficient bearing capacity of geological materials. Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) holds considerable significance in rock engineering projects. Consequently, this study endeavors to devise efficient models for the expeditious and economical estimation of UCS. Using a dataset of 729 samples, including the Schmidt hammer rebound number, P-wave velocity, and point load index data, we evaluated six algorithms, namely Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Random Forest (RF), and Extra Trees (ET) and utilized Bayesian Optimization (BO) to optimize the aforementioned algorithms. Moreover, we applied model evaluation metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Variance Accounted For (VAF), Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Weighted Mean Absolute Percentage Error (WMAPE), Coefficient of Correlation (R), and Coefficient of Determination (R2). Among the six models, BO-ET emerged as the most optimal performer during training (RMSE ​= ​4.5042, MAE ​= ​3.2328, VAF ​= ​0.9898, NSE ​= ​0.9898, WMAPE ​= ​0.0538, R ​= ​0.9955, R2 ​= ​0.9898) and testing (RMSE ​= ​4.8234, MAE ​= ​3.9737, VAF ​= ​0.9881, NSE ​= ​0.9875, WMAPE ​= ​0.2515, R ​= ​0.9940, R2 ​= ​0.9875) phases. Additionally, we conducted a systematic comparison between ensemble and traditional single machine learning models such as decision tree, support vector machine, and K-Nearest Neighbors, thus highlighting the advantages of ensemble learning. Furthermore, the enhancement effect of BO on generalization performance was assessed. Finally, a BO-ET-based Graphical User Interface (GUI) system was developed and validated in a Tunnel Boring Machine-excavated tunnel.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于天然岩石单轴抗压强度预测的贝叶斯优化增强集合学习及其应用
岩爆和坍塌等工程灾害与地质材料承载能力不足造成的结构失稳密切相关。单轴抗压强度(UCS)在岩石工程项目中具有相当重要的意义。因此,本研究致力于设计有效的模型,以快速、经济地估算单轴抗压强度。我们利用包括施密特锤回弹数、P 波速度和点荷载指数数据在内的 729 个样本数据集,评估了六种算法,即自适应提升(AdaBoost)、梯度提升决策树(GBDT)、极端梯度提升(XGBoost)、轻梯度提升机(LightGBM)、随机森林(RF)和额外树(ET),并利用贝叶斯优化(BO)对上述算法进行了优化。此外,我们还应用了均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、方差占比(VAF)、纳什-苏特克利夫效率(NSE)、加权平均绝对百分比误差(WMAPE)、相关系数(R)和决定系数(R2)等模型评估指标。在六个模型中,BO-ET 在训练中表现最佳(RMSE = 4.5042,MAE = 3.2328,VAF = 0.9898,NSE = 0.9898,WMAPE = 0.0538,R = 0.9955,R2 = 0.9898)和测试(RMSE = 4.8234,MAE = 3.9737,VAF = 0.9881,NSE = 0.9875,WMAPE = 0.2515,R = 0.9940,R2 = 0.9875)阶段。此外,我们还对集合学习模型和传统的单一机器学习模型(如决策树、支持向量机和 K-Nearest Neighbors)进行了系统比较,从而突出了集合学习的优势。此外,还评估了 BO 对泛化性能的增强效果。最后,开发了基于 BO-ET 的图形用户界面(GUI)系统,并在隧道掘进机开挖的隧道中进行了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Optimization design method of 2D+3D slope shape for landslide prevention in open-pit coal mine Stability prediction of roadway surrounding rock using INGO-RF Leveraging artificial neural networks for robust landslide susceptibility mapping: A geospatial modeling approach in the ecologically sensitive Nilgiri District, Tamil Nadu Prediction of coal and gas outburst hazard using kernel principal component analysis and an enhanced extreme learning machine approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1