External representations in strategic decision‐making: Understanding strategy's reliance on visuals

IF 6.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Strategic Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1002/smj.3613
Felipe A. Csaszar, Nicole Hinrichs, Mana Heshmati
{"title":"External representations in strategic decision‐making: Understanding strategy's reliance on visuals","authors":"Felipe A. Csaszar, Nicole Hinrichs, Mana Heshmati","doi":"10.1002/smj.3613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research SummaryExternal representations, particularly visuals, are important in strategic decision‐making. However, their pervasiveness and impact are not well understood in the strategy literature. Based on cognitive science research, we identify four cognitive functions crucial to strategic decision‐making that benefit from using external representations. We also propose a conceptual model and propositions that explain how the quality of strategic decision‐making depends on the interactions among task environment, external representations, and managers. We show that external representations influence in predictable ways the boundedly rational process of searching for new strategies. Key determinants include the manager's representational capability and the usability and malleability of the external representation. We discuss implications for users, designers, and teachers of external representations in strategy, as well as suggest avenues for future research.Managerial SummaryThis research points to the pivotal role of external representations, especially visuals, in strategic decision‐making. Drawing from cognitive science, this study identifies four critical cognitive functions that benefit from these external representations—working memory, long‐term memory, pattern recognition, and knowledge transfer. Further, the study highlights that external representations significantly influence the process of strategic decision‐making in predictable ways. Finally, we show that not all external representations are alike in their ease of use and a managers' ability to operate on an external representation, referred to as representational capability, greatly affects the decision‐making quality. The implications extend to users, designers, and educators of external representations, urging attention to the design and use of external representations for improved decision outcomes.","PeriodicalId":22023,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3613","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research SummaryExternal representations, particularly visuals, are important in strategic decision‐making. However, their pervasiveness and impact are not well understood in the strategy literature. Based on cognitive science research, we identify four cognitive functions crucial to strategic decision‐making that benefit from using external representations. We also propose a conceptual model and propositions that explain how the quality of strategic decision‐making depends on the interactions among task environment, external representations, and managers. We show that external representations influence in predictable ways the boundedly rational process of searching for new strategies. Key determinants include the manager's representational capability and the usability and malleability of the external representation. We discuss implications for users, designers, and teachers of external representations in strategy, as well as suggest avenues for future research.Managerial SummaryThis research points to the pivotal role of external representations, especially visuals, in strategic decision‐making. Drawing from cognitive science, this study identifies four critical cognitive functions that benefit from these external representations—working memory, long‐term memory, pattern recognition, and knowledge transfer. Further, the study highlights that external representations significantly influence the process of strategic decision‐making in predictable ways. Finally, we show that not all external representations are alike in their ease of use and a managers' ability to operate on an external representation, referred to as representational capability, greatly affects the decision‐making quality. The implications extend to users, designers, and educators of external representations, urging attention to the design and use of external representations for improved decision outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战略决策中的外部表征:了解战略对视觉效果的依赖
研究摘要外部表征,尤其是视觉效果,在战略决策中非常重要。然而,战略文献中对外部表征的普遍性和影响并不十分了解。基于认知科学研究,我们确定了对战略决策至关重要的四种认知功能,这些功能可从使用外部表征中获益。我们还提出了一个概念模型和命题,解释战略决策的质量如何取决于任务环境、外部表征和管理者之间的相互作用。我们表明,外部表征会以可预测的方式影响寻找新战略的有限理性过程。关键的决定因素包括管理者的表征能力以及外部表征的可用性和可塑性。我们讨论了外部表征对战略用户、设计者和教师的影响,并提出了未来的研究方向。管理总结这项研究指出了外部表征(尤其是视觉效果)在战略决策中的关键作用。本研究从认知科学的角度出发,确定了受益于这些外部表征的四种关键认知功能--工作记忆、长期记忆、模式识别和知识转移。此外,本研究还强调,外部表征会以可预测的方式对战略决策过程产生重大影响。最后,我们表明,并非所有外部表征在易用性方面都是一样的,管理者在外部表征上的操作能力(即表征能力)会极大地影响决策质量。这对外部表征的使用者、设计者和教育者都有影响,促使他们关注外部表征的设计和使用,以改善决策结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.40%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: At the Strategic Management Journal, we are committed to publishing top-tier research that addresses key questions in the field of strategic management and captivates scholars in this area. Our publication welcomes manuscripts covering a wide range of topics, perspectives, and research methodologies. As a result, our editorial decisions truly embrace the diversity inherent in the field.
期刊最新文献
What makes activities strategic: Toward a new framework for strategy-as-practice research Gender and racial minorities on corporate boards: How board faultlines and CEO‐minority director overlap affect firm performance Do makerspaces affect entrepreneurship? If so, who, how, and when? Balancing allocative and dynamic efficiency with redundant R&D allocation: The role of organizational proximity and centralization Identifying microfoundations of dynamic managerial capabilities for business model innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1