Stepping Through Origins: Nature, Home, & Landscape in Irish Literature by Jefferson Holdridge (review)

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1353/jjq.2023.a927926
Marjorie Howes
{"title":"Stepping Through Origins: Nature, Home, & Landscape in Irish Literature by Jefferson Holdridge (review)","authors":"Marjorie Howes","doi":"10.1353/jjq.2023.a927926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Stepping Through Origins: Nature, Home, &amp; Landscape in Irish Literature</em> by Jefferson Holdridge <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Marjorie Howes (bio) </li> </ul> <em>STEPPING THROUGH ORIGINS: NATURE, HOME, &amp; LANDSCAPE IN IRISH LITERATURE</em>, by Jefferson Holdridge. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2022. x + 286 pp. $80.00 cloth, $39.95 paper. <p>The subtitle of this ambitious and original book indicates the particular terms that are most important to its central arguments. \"Nature,\" as Jefferson Holdridge defines it, encompasses a vast array of forces, both internal and external, that humans struggle to <strong>[End Page 158]</strong> control. Nature is above all a principle of disruption; \"eruptions of nature,\" Holdridge says, are \"Oedipal, animal, erotic, ecological, or varying combinations of these categories\" (2). Nature can also erupt variously in the realms of politics, religion, or violence. \"Landscape,\" for Holdridge, is \"a humanized version of nature\" (2) that has been shaped and controlled by humans. In Holdridge's argument, nature emerges as something, or a series of somethings, that humans try to tame and manage but that constantly thwarts such efforts at control. This exceptionally capacious and flexible definition of nature allows Holdridge to forge connections across a wide range of texts and time periods. The result is frequently illuminating.</p> <p>The chapter on the eighteenth century locates \"nature\" in Jonathan Swift in that author's satirical view of human nature as monstrous and contrasts this to Oliver Goldsmith's more pastoral vision, while also arguing that the two share the same \"aim to unmask bad government and the destruction of beauty and morality\" (35). Moving to the nineteenth century, and to Lady Morgan and William Carleton, Holdridge continues to trace contrasting responses to Ireland's colonial history: \"If the rupture reflected in the landscape is a strong encounter with history, then pastoral harmony is a compensatory shift in the psychology of aesthetics. … The eruptions of wilderness and the compensations of the pleasant place are mutually defining opposites\" (44). This argument is both broadly synthetic and admirably dialectical. It allows Holdridge to make intriguing connections among authors as apparently disparate as Swift, Morgan, and Carleton. Such connections, rather than extended or original readings of individual texts, are the book's main strengths. Given the book's ambitious chronological and textual range, it is perhaps inevitable that occasionally a connection or a sweeping generalization falls somewhat flat. The claim that \"[i]f society is harmonious, so are its aesthetic representations; if it is in upheaval, its art reflects the troubles\" (36), for example, is too reductive to be helpful and lacks the sophistication of the book's more specific and nuanced juxtapositions of, say, Swift and Goldsmith.</p> <p>Later chapters on W. B. Yeats and James Joyce shift away from political history, focusing on Yeats's conception of the divine and Joyce's representations of desire, betrayal, and Oedipal dramas, respectively. The Yeats chapter explores the insightful formulation that \"for Yeats … God and nature are at times opposed and at times one and the same\" (84). Yeats, Holdridge argues, forges links among \"the divine, the instinctual world of animals, and the unconscious,\" a juxtaposition of registers that gets at some profoundly important aspects of Yeats's thinking, particularly the middle and late Yeats and the Yeats of <em>A Vision</em> (85).<sup>1</sup> The Joyce chapter chooses to focus primarily on his <em>Pomes Penyeach</em>,<sup>2</sup> arguing that the \"lyric moment\" is <strong>[End Page 159]</strong> \"as important if not more important\" to Joyce in relation to his satirical voice (105). Here, too, Holdridge's thinking is subtle, flexible, and dialectical: \"If nature as emblem of psychological wounds reminds Joyce of exile and suffering in the image from 'Tilly' of the 'torn bough,' then in these poems landscape provides the common ground for love and escape\" (106).<sup>3</sup> He also situates Joyce in relation to the Irish Literary Revival, arguing that in response to the \"pastoral meditations\" of the Revival, Joyce \"gives us an urban pastoral not only to show how the pastoral myth excludes the city dweller, but also to illustrate how the land has often been a sign of exclusion for the Irish\" (106). For Joyce, Holdridge observes, \"[n]ature is double-sided: a blessing and a curse, a sign of sin and a pathway to redemption...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":42413,"journal":{"name":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2023.a927926","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Stepping Through Origins: Nature, Home, & Landscape in Irish Literature by Jefferson Holdridge
  • Marjorie Howes (bio)
STEPPING THROUGH ORIGINS: NATURE, HOME, & LANDSCAPE IN IRISH LITERATURE, by Jefferson Holdridge. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2022. x + 286 pp. $80.00 cloth, $39.95 paper.

The subtitle of this ambitious and original book indicates the particular terms that are most important to its central arguments. "Nature," as Jefferson Holdridge defines it, encompasses a vast array of forces, both internal and external, that humans struggle to [End Page 158] control. Nature is above all a principle of disruption; "eruptions of nature," Holdridge says, are "Oedipal, animal, erotic, ecological, or varying combinations of these categories" (2). Nature can also erupt variously in the realms of politics, religion, or violence. "Landscape," for Holdridge, is "a humanized version of nature" (2) that has been shaped and controlled by humans. In Holdridge's argument, nature emerges as something, or a series of somethings, that humans try to tame and manage but that constantly thwarts such efforts at control. This exceptionally capacious and flexible definition of nature allows Holdridge to forge connections across a wide range of texts and time periods. The result is frequently illuminating.

The chapter on the eighteenth century locates "nature" in Jonathan Swift in that author's satirical view of human nature as monstrous and contrasts this to Oliver Goldsmith's more pastoral vision, while also arguing that the two share the same "aim to unmask bad government and the destruction of beauty and morality" (35). Moving to the nineteenth century, and to Lady Morgan and William Carleton, Holdridge continues to trace contrasting responses to Ireland's colonial history: "If the rupture reflected in the landscape is a strong encounter with history, then pastoral harmony is a compensatory shift in the psychology of aesthetics. … The eruptions of wilderness and the compensations of the pleasant place are mutually defining opposites" (44). This argument is both broadly synthetic and admirably dialectical. It allows Holdridge to make intriguing connections among authors as apparently disparate as Swift, Morgan, and Carleton. Such connections, rather than extended or original readings of individual texts, are the book's main strengths. Given the book's ambitious chronological and textual range, it is perhaps inevitable that occasionally a connection or a sweeping generalization falls somewhat flat. The claim that "[i]f society is harmonious, so are its aesthetic representations; if it is in upheaval, its art reflects the troubles" (36), for example, is too reductive to be helpful and lacks the sophistication of the book's more specific and nuanced juxtapositions of, say, Swift and Goldsmith.

Later chapters on W. B. Yeats and James Joyce shift away from political history, focusing on Yeats's conception of the divine and Joyce's representations of desire, betrayal, and Oedipal dramas, respectively. The Yeats chapter explores the insightful formulation that "for Yeats … God and nature are at times opposed and at times one and the same" (84). Yeats, Holdridge argues, forges links among "the divine, the instinctual world of animals, and the unconscious," a juxtaposition of registers that gets at some profoundly important aspects of Yeats's thinking, particularly the middle and late Yeats and the Yeats of A Vision (85).1 The Joyce chapter chooses to focus primarily on his Pomes Penyeach,2 arguing that the "lyric moment" is [End Page 159] "as important if not more important" to Joyce in relation to his satirical voice (105). Here, too, Holdridge's thinking is subtle, flexible, and dialectical: "If nature as emblem of psychological wounds reminds Joyce of exile and suffering in the image from 'Tilly' of the 'torn bough,' then in these poems landscape provides the common ground for love and escape" (106).3 He also situates Joyce in relation to the Irish Literary Revival, arguing that in response to the "pastoral meditations" of the Revival, Joyce "gives us an urban pastoral not only to show how the pastoral myth excludes the city dweller, but also to illustrate how the land has often been a sign of exclusion for the Irish" (106). For Joyce, Holdridge observes, "[n]ature is double-sided: a blessing and a curse, a sign of sin and a pathway to redemption...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
踏过起源:杰斐逊-霍尔德里奇著《爱尔兰文学中的自然、家园与风景》(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 踏过起源:Jefferson Holdridge 所著《爱尔兰文学中的自然、家园和景观》 Marjorie Howes (bio) 《踏过起源:爱尔兰文学中的自然、家园和景观》,Jefferson Holdridge 著。雪城:雪城大学出版社,2022 年。x + 286 pp.布版 80.00 美元,纸版 39.95 美元。这本雄心勃勃的原创性著作的副标题指出了对其中心论点最为重要的特定术语。按照杰斐逊-霍尔德里奇的定义,"自然 "包括人类竭力 [完 158 页] 控制的大量内部和外部力量。霍尔德里奇说,"自然的爆发 "是 "恋母、动物、情欲、生态或这些类别的不同组合"(2)。在政治、宗教或暴力领域,自然也会爆发出不同的形式。在霍尔德里奇看来,"景观 "是 "人类塑造和控制的自然的人性化版本"(2)。在霍尔德里奇的论证中,自然是人类试图驯服和管理的某种东西,或者说是一系列的某种东西,但人类不断挫败这种控制努力。霍尔德里奇对 "自然 "的定义异常宽泛而灵活,这使得他能够在各种文本和各个时期之间建立联系。其结果常常令人豁然开朗。关于十八世纪的一章将 "自然 "定位于乔纳森-斯威夫特(Jonathan Swift)笔下的 "人性",他讽刺人性是畸形的,并将其与奥利弗-戈德史密斯(Oliver Goldsmith)更具田园诗意的观点进行对比,同时还认为两者的共同目标是 "揭露弊政以及对美和道德的破坏"(35)。进入 19 世纪,在摩根夫人和威廉-卡尔顿身上,霍尔德里奇继续追溯对爱尔兰殖民历史的截然不同的反应:"如果说景观所反映的断裂是与历史的强烈碰撞,那么田园和谐则是审美心理的补偿性转变。......荒野的爆发与宜人之地的补偿是相互定义的对立面"(44)。这一论点既有广泛的综合性,又有令人钦佩的辩证性。它让霍尔德里奇在斯威夫特、摩尔根和卡尔顿这些看似不同的作家之间建立了耐人寻味的联系。这种联系,而不是对个别文本的扩展或原创性解读,是本书的主要优势。鉴于该书在年代和文本方面的宏大篇幅,偶尔的联系或一概而论或许难免有些平淡无奇。例如,"如果社会是和谐的,那么它的审美表征也是和谐的;如果社会处于动荡之中,那么它的艺术就会反映出这种动荡"(36),这种说法过于简单,缺乏本书对斯威夫特和戈德史密斯等人进行更具体、更细微并列分析时的精致。后来关于叶芝和詹姆斯-乔伊斯的章节不再讨论政治史,而是分别关注叶芝的神性概念和乔伊斯对欲望、背叛和恋母情结的表现。叶芝一章探讨了 "对叶芝而言......上帝与自然时而对立,时而又合二为一"(84)这一富有洞察力的表述。霍尔德里奇认为,叶芝在 "神性、动物的本能世界和无意识 "之间建立了联系,这种并置的表达方式揭示了叶芝思想的一些极为重要的方面,尤其是中后期的叶芝和《幻象》中的叶芝(85)。1 乔伊斯一章主要关注的是他的《抒情诗》(Pomes Penyeach)2,认为 "抒情时刻"[尾页 159]与乔伊斯的讽刺之声 "同等重要,甚至更为重要"(105)。在这里,霍尔德里奇的思考也是微妙、灵活和辩证的:"如果说作为心理创伤象征的大自然让乔伊斯想起了《蒂利》中'撕裂的枝桠'这一意象中的流放和痛苦,那么在这些诗中,风景则为爱情和逃避提供了共同的土壤"(106)。3 他还将乔伊斯与爱尔兰文学复兴联系起来,认为为了回应文学复兴的 "田园沉思",乔伊斯 "为我们提供了一首城市田园诗,这不仅是为了说明田园神话是如何排斥城市居民的,也是为了说明土地是如何经常成为排斥爱尔兰人的标志"(106)。霍尔德里奇指出,对于乔伊斯来说,"土地是双面的:既是祝福,也是诅咒;既是罪恶的象征,也是获得救赎的途径......"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY
JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963 at the University of Tulsa by Thomas F. Staley, the James Joyce Quarterly has been the flagship journal of international Joyce studies ever since. In each issue, the JJQ brings together a wide array of critical and theoretical work focusing on the life, writing, and reception of James Joyce. We encourage submissions of all types, welcoming archival, historical, biographical, and critical research. Each issue of the JJQ provides a selection of peer-reviewed essays representing the very best in contemporary Joyce scholarship. In addition, the journal publishes notes, reviews, letters, a comprehensive checklist of recent Joyce-related publications, and the editor"s "Raising the Wind" comments.
期刊最新文献
Calling Forth the Future: Joyce and the Messianism of Absence Ulysses "seen" Introducing Robert Berry's "Aeolus" A Cold Case of Irish Facts: Re(:)visiting John Stanislaus Joyce Stepping Through Origins: Nature, Home, & Landscape in Irish Literature by Jefferson Holdridge (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1