Is science to be trusted? How environmentally active youths relate to science in social media.

IF 3.5 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Public Understanding of Science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1177/09636625241249915
Karin M Gustafsson
{"title":"Is science to be trusted? How environmentally active youths relate to science in social media.","authors":"Karin M Gustafsson","doi":"10.1177/09636625241249915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research has shown a great distrust among youths toward political representatives, who they demand should \"listen to the science.\" However, less research has been done on youths' own trust in science. This study explores and explains how youths who are environmentally active in two different environmental youth organizations relate to science in social media, whether they trust science, and how youths' relation to science creates a discursive context in which they may develop their identity. The study uses the approach of discourse analysis to examine social media content published on Facebook by <i>Fridays for Future Sweden</i> and <i>Fältbiologerna</i> (the Swedish Field Biologists). The study shows (i) how subject positions for <i>scientists</i> and <i>youth</i> are created in relation to one another based on different expressions of youths' trust in science and (ii) how environmental youth organizations, by identifying with science, make youths important actors in the discourse on climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":" ","pages":"76-91"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Understanding of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241249915","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has shown a great distrust among youths toward political representatives, who they demand should "listen to the science." However, less research has been done on youths' own trust in science. This study explores and explains how youths who are environmentally active in two different environmental youth organizations relate to science in social media, whether they trust science, and how youths' relation to science creates a discursive context in which they may develop their identity. The study uses the approach of discourse analysis to examine social media content published on Facebook by Fridays for Future Sweden and Fältbiologerna (the Swedish Field Biologists). The study shows (i) how subject positions for scientists and youth are created in relation to one another based on different expressions of youths' trust in science and (ii) how environmental youth organizations, by identifying with science, make youths important actors in the discourse on climate change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学可信吗?热衷环保的青少年如何在社交媒体上与科学建立联系。
研究表明,青少年对政治代表非常不信任,他们要求政治代表 "倾听科学的声音"。然而,有关青少年自身对科学的信任的研究却较少。本研究探讨并解释了在两个不同的青年环保组织中从事环保活动的青年是如何在社交媒体中与科学发生关系的,他们是否信任科学,以及青年与科学的关系是如何创造一种话语环境,使他们在其中形成自己的身份认同的。本研究采用话语分析的方法,考察了瑞典未来星期五(Fridays for Future Sweden)和瑞典野外生物学家协会(Fältbiologerna)在 Facebook 上发布的社交媒体内容。研究表明:(i) 基于青年对科学信任的不同表达方式,科学家和青年的主体地位是如何相互建立的;(ii) 青年环保组织如何通过认同科学,使青年成为气候变化话语的重要参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Public Understanding of Science is a fully peer reviewed international journal covering all aspects of the inter-relationships between science (including technology and medicine) and the public. Public Understanding of Science is the only journal to cover all aspects of the inter-relationships between science (including technology and medicine) and the public. Topics Covered Include... ·surveys of public understanding and attitudes towards science and technology ·perceptions of science ·popular representations of science ·scientific and para-scientific belief systems ·science in schools
期刊最新文献
COVID scientists as rhetorical citizens: Persuasive op-eds and public debate over science policy. Are plain language summaries more readable than scientific abstracts? Evidence from six biomedical and life sciences journals. Is science to be trusted? How environmentally active youths relate to science in social media. Cognitive, affective, and behavioral engagement with science news predicted by the use of accessibility strategies in science-minded and general audiences. 'Follow the science': Popular trust in scientific experts during the coronavirus pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1