University teachers’ perspectives on student attendance: a challenge to the identity of university teachers before, during and after Covid-19

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Research for Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1007/s10671-024-09375-6
Mateus Detoni, Arlene Allan, Sean Connelly, Tina Summerfield, Sheena Townsend, Kerry Shephard
{"title":"University teachers’ perspectives on student attendance: a challenge to the identity of university teachers before, during and after Covid-19","authors":"Mateus Detoni, Arlene Allan, Sean Connelly, Tina Summerfield, Sheena Townsend, Kerry Shephard","doi":"10.1007/s10671-024-09375-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article addresses university teachers’ perspectives, gathered via interviews, on issues involved in their students’ decreasing attendance in formal taught-events, before and during the pandemic, and the implications of this for university teaching in the future. The research was part of a broad enquiry into learning and teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic, conducted in one research-led university in New Zealand by a research team of 19 university academics from multiple departments in this institution. We undertook 11 semi-structured interviews with eight professors, one lecturer and two teaching fellows, anonymous to all but the interviewer. A sub-group (authors of this article) used a general inductive approach to seek an underlying structure of experiences evident in participants’ interviews, in the form of emergent and reoccurring themes in the data. Self-determination theory was used as a theoretical framework for analysis. Themes suggest that university teachers may be stressed about attendance, increasingly uncertain about the links between how they teach and what and how students learn, and feel personally rather than collectively responsible as they address matters that they perceive to be only partially under their control. Researchers concluded that interviewed teachers may be collectively experiencing some form of crisis of confidence relating to their roles, responsibilities and identity as university teachers. Although perceptions of limited autonomy, relatedness and competence all suggest solutions at the institutional level, their combination and link to generic academic identity suggests that Covid-19 may have exposed broader limitations in university teaching as a collegiate, rather than professional, activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":44841,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research for Policy and Practice","volume":"236 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research for Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-024-09375-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article addresses university teachers’ perspectives, gathered via interviews, on issues involved in their students’ decreasing attendance in formal taught-events, before and during the pandemic, and the implications of this for university teaching in the future. The research was part of a broad enquiry into learning and teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic, conducted in one research-led university in New Zealand by a research team of 19 university academics from multiple departments in this institution. We undertook 11 semi-structured interviews with eight professors, one lecturer and two teaching fellows, anonymous to all but the interviewer. A sub-group (authors of this article) used a general inductive approach to seek an underlying structure of experiences evident in participants’ interviews, in the form of emergent and reoccurring themes in the data. Self-determination theory was used as a theoretical framework for analysis. Themes suggest that university teachers may be stressed about attendance, increasingly uncertain about the links between how they teach and what and how students learn, and feel personally rather than collectively responsible as they address matters that they perceive to be only partially under their control. Researchers concluded that interviewed teachers may be collectively experiencing some form of crisis of confidence relating to their roles, responsibilities and identity as university teachers. Although perceptions of limited autonomy, relatedness and competence all suggest solutions at the institutional level, their combination and link to generic academic identity suggests that Covid-19 may have exposed broader limitations in university teaching as a collegiate, rather than professional, activity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学教师对学生出勤率的看法:Covid-19 之前、期间和之后对大学教师身份的挑战
本文通过访谈收集了大学教师对学生在大流行之前和期间参加正式教学活动的人数减少所涉及的问题的看法,以及这对未来大学教学的影响。这项研究是对科维德-19 大流行病期间的学习和教学进行的广泛调查的一部分,由新西兰一所研究型大学的 19 名大学学者组成的研究小组进行。我们对八位教授、一位讲师和两位教学研究员进行了 11 次半结构式访谈,除访谈者外,其他人都是匿名的。一个小组(本文作者)采用一般归纳法,以数据中出现和重复出现的主题的形式,寻找参与者访谈中明显的经验的潜在结构。自我决定理论被用作分析的理论框架。这些主题表明,大学教师可能对出勤率感到紧张,对自己的教学方式与学生的学习内容和学习方式之间的联系越来越不确定,在处理他们认为仅部分受自己控制的事务时,感到自己负有个人责任而不是集体责任。研究人员得出结论认为,受访教师可能在大学教师的角色、责任和身份认同方面集体经历了某种形式的信任危机。尽管对有限的自主性、关联性和能力的看法都提出了机构层面的解决方案,但它们的结合以及与一般学术身份的联系表明,Covid-19 可能暴露了大学教学作为一种学院活动而非职业活动的广泛局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Research for Policy and Practice
Educational Research for Policy and Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Educational Research for Policy and Practice, the official journal of the Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association, aims to improve education and educational research in Asia and the Pacific by promoting the dissemination of high quality research which addresses key issues in educational policy and practice. Therefore, priority will be given to research which has generated a substantive result of importance for educational policy and practice; to analyses of global forces, regional trends and national educational reforms; and to studies of key issues in teaching, learning and development - such as the challenges to be faced in learning to live together in what is the largest and most diverse region of the world. With a broad coverage of education in all sectors and levels of education, the Journal seeks to promote the contribution of educational research, both quantitative and qualitative, to system-wide reforms and policy making on the one hand, and to resolving specific problems facing teachers and learners at a particular level of education in the Asia-Pacific region on the other. Education systems worldwide face many common problems as global forces reshape our institutions and lives, while at the same time, the research and problems facing education in Asia and the Pacific reflect its rich cultural and scholarly traditions as well as specific economic and social realities. Educators and researchers can learn from significant investigations, reform programmes, evaluations and case studies of innovations in countries and cultures other than their own. One purpose of this Journal is to make such investigations within the Asian-Pacific region more widely known.
期刊最新文献
The role of achievement emotions in team-based learning Servant leadership for sustainability in higher education: policy implications based on ethical behavior and conceptual skills of scholars with science-related backgrounds Learning management systems are great but can they guarantee the acceptability of pure online classes in post-pandemic scenario? Editorial: teacher education in Singapore in the twenty-first century—the past, the present and envisioning the future University teachers’ perspectives on student attendance: a challenge to the identity of university teachers before, during and after Covid-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1