Implications of institutional politics in the implementation of higher education policy reforms in Tanzania, 1985–2020

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Research for Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1007/s10671-024-09376-5
Shafii Dini Kanju, Conrad John Masabo
{"title":"Implications of institutional politics in the implementation of higher education policy reforms in Tanzania, 1985–2020","authors":"Shafii Dini Kanju, Conrad John Masabo","doi":"10.1007/s10671-024-09376-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Policy implementation is vital for the realization of predetermined policy goals. In the last decades, several studies have analyzed higher education policy reforms. Nevertheless, studies on institutional politics and the implementation of higher education policy reforms in the Tanzanian context are scant. Drawing on new institutionalism, this paper examines the implications of institutional politics in the implementation of higher education policy reforms in Tanzania. The paper paid a specific focus on higher education financing, access, and quality as its analytical dimensions. Data collection was grounded on semi-structured elite interviews conducted with 32 key informants elites purposively selected from the institutions covered in the study. This was supplemented by data generated from the analysis of documents. Findings suggest that political interests directed the implementation of higher education financing and access policies, which in turn affected the quality of education delivered. The paper recommends for a policy guarantee on the autonomy of higher education institutions (HEIs), the need for HEIs to stick on academic requirements to counter financial temptations, and refraining from the politicization of financing education. Political determination is stressed as core for building the foundation for effective policies in higher education and education in general.</p>","PeriodicalId":44841,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research for Policy and Practice","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research for Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-024-09376-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy implementation is vital for the realization of predetermined policy goals. In the last decades, several studies have analyzed higher education policy reforms. Nevertheless, studies on institutional politics and the implementation of higher education policy reforms in the Tanzanian context are scant. Drawing on new institutionalism, this paper examines the implications of institutional politics in the implementation of higher education policy reforms in Tanzania. The paper paid a specific focus on higher education financing, access, and quality as its analytical dimensions. Data collection was grounded on semi-structured elite interviews conducted with 32 key informants elites purposively selected from the institutions covered in the study. This was supplemented by data generated from the analysis of documents. Findings suggest that political interests directed the implementation of higher education financing and access policies, which in turn affected the quality of education delivered. The paper recommends for a policy guarantee on the autonomy of higher education institutions (HEIs), the need for HEIs to stick on academic requirements to counter financial temptations, and refraining from the politicization of financing education. Political determination is stressed as core for building the foundation for effective policies in higher education and education in general.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1985-2020 年坦桑尼亚高等教育政策改革实施过程中的机构政治影响
政策的实施对于实现预定的政策目标至关重要。在过去的几十年中,已有多项研究对高等教育政策改革进行了分析。然而,在坦桑尼亚,有关制度政治和高等教育政策改革实施的研究却很少。本文以新制度主义为基础,探讨了制度政治对坦桑尼亚高等教育政策改革实施的影响。本文特别关注高等教育融资、入学机会和质量这三个分析维度。数据收集以半结构化精英访谈为基础,有针对性地从研究涵盖的院校中挑选了 32 名关键信息精英进行访谈。此外,还对文件进行了分析。研究结果表明,政治利益引导着高等教育资助和入学政策的实施,这反过来又影响了所提供教育的质量。论文建议在政策上保障高等教育机构(HEIs)的自主权,高等教育机构需要坚持学术要求以抵御经济诱惑,并避免将教育资助政治化。文件强调,政治决心是为高等教育和整个教育领域的有效政策奠定基础的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Research for Policy and Practice
Educational Research for Policy and Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Educational Research for Policy and Practice, the official journal of the Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association, aims to improve education and educational research in Asia and the Pacific by promoting the dissemination of high quality research which addresses key issues in educational policy and practice. Therefore, priority will be given to research which has generated a substantive result of importance for educational policy and practice; to analyses of global forces, regional trends and national educational reforms; and to studies of key issues in teaching, learning and development - such as the challenges to be faced in learning to live together in what is the largest and most diverse region of the world. With a broad coverage of education in all sectors and levels of education, the Journal seeks to promote the contribution of educational research, both quantitative and qualitative, to system-wide reforms and policy making on the one hand, and to resolving specific problems facing teachers and learners at a particular level of education in the Asia-Pacific region on the other. Education systems worldwide face many common problems as global forces reshape our institutions and lives, while at the same time, the research and problems facing education in Asia and the Pacific reflect its rich cultural and scholarly traditions as well as specific economic and social realities. Educators and researchers can learn from significant investigations, reform programmes, evaluations and case studies of innovations in countries and cultures other than their own. One purpose of this Journal is to make such investigations within the Asian-Pacific region more widely known.
期刊最新文献
The role of achievement emotions in team-based learning Servant leadership for sustainability in higher education: policy implications based on ethical behavior and conceptual skills of scholars with science-related backgrounds Learning management systems are great but can they guarantee the acceptability of pure online classes in post-pandemic scenario? Editorial: teacher education in Singapore in the twenty-first century—the past, the present and envisioning the future University teachers’ perspectives on student attendance: a challenge to the identity of university teachers before, during and after Covid-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1