Do Agile scaling approaches make a difference? an empirical comparison of team effectiveness across popular scaling approaches

IF 3.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Empirical Software Engineering Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1007/s10664-024-10481-5
Christiaan Verwijs, Daniel Russo
{"title":"Do Agile scaling approaches make a difference? an empirical comparison of team effectiveness across popular scaling approaches","authors":"Christiaan Verwijs, Daniel Russo","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10481-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the prevalent use of Agile methodologies, organizations are grappling with the challenge of scaling development across numerous teams. This has led to the emergence of diverse scaling strategies, from complex ones such as “SAFe\", to more simplified methods e.g., “LeSS\", with some organizations devising their unique approaches. While there have been multiple studies exploring the organizational challenges associated with different scaling approaches, so far, no one has compared these strategies based on empirical data derived from a uniform measure. This makes it hard to draw robust conclusions about how different scaling approaches affect Agile team effectiveness. Thus, the objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of Agile teams across various scaling approaches, including “SAFe\", “LeSS\", “Scrum of Scrums\", and custom methods, as well as those not using scaling. This study focuses initially on responsiveness, stakeholder concern, continuous improvement, team autonomy, management approach, and overall team effectiveness, followed by an evaluation based on stakeholder satisfaction regarding value, responsiveness, and release frequency. To achieve this, we performed a comprehensive survey involving 15,078 members of 4,013 Agile teams to measure their effectiveness, combined with satisfaction surveys from 1,841 stakeholders of 529 of those teams. We conducted a series of inferential statistical analyses, including Analysis of Variance and multiple linear regression, to identify any significant differences, while controlling for team experience and organizational size. The findings of the study revealed some significant differences, but their magnitude and effect size were considered too negligible to have practical significance. In conclusion, the choice of Agile scaling strategy does not markedly influence team effectiveness, and organizations are advised to choose a method that best aligns with their previous experiences with Agile, organizational culture, and management style.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10481-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the prevalent use of Agile methodologies, organizations are grappling with the challenge of scaling development across numerous teams. This has led to the emergence of diverse scaling strategies, from complex ones such as “SAFe", to more simplified methods e.g., “LeSS", with some organizations devising their unique approaches. While there have been multiple studies exploring the organizational challenges associated with different scaling approaches, so far, no one has compared these strategies based on empirical data derived from a uniform measure. This makes it hard to draw robust conclusions about how different scaling approaches affect Agile team effectiveness. Thus, the objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of Agile teams across various scaling approaches, including “SAFe", “LeSS", “Scrum of Scrums", and custom methods, as well as those not using scaling. This study focuses initially on responsiveness, stakeholder concern, continuous improvement, team autonomy, management approach, and overall team effectiveness, followed by an evaluation based on stakeholder satisfaction regarding value, responsiveness, and release frequency. To achieve this, we performed a comprehensive survey involving 15,078 members of 4,013 Agile teams to measure their effectiveness, combined with satisfaction surveys from 1,841 stakeholders of 529 of those teams. We conducted a series of inferential statistical analyses, including Analysis of Variance and multiple linear regression, to identify any significant differences, while controlling for team experience and organizational size. The findings of the study revealed some significant differences, but their magnitude and effect size were considered too negligible to have practical significance. In conclusion, the choice of Agile scaling strategy does not markedly influence team effectiveness, and organizations are advised to choose a method that best aligns with their previous experiences with Agile, organizational culture, and management style.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
敏捷扩展方法有区别吗?对各种流行扩展方法的团队效率进行实证比较
随着敏捷方法的普遍使用,企业正在努力应对在众多团队中扩展开发的挑战。这导致出现了各种不同的扩展策略,从 "SAFe "等复杂策略到 "LeSS "等更简化的方法,有些组织还设计了自己独特的方法。虽然已有多项研究探讨了与不同扩展方法相关的组织挑战,但迄今为止,还没有人根据统一衡量标准得出的经验数据对这些战略进行过比较。因此,很难就不同的扩展方法如何影响敏捷团队的效率得出可靠的结论。因此,本研究的目的是评估不同扩展方法(包括 "SAFe"、"LeSS"、"Scrum of Scrums "和自定义方法)下的敏捷团队的有效性,以及未使用扩展方法的敏捷团队的有效性。本研究首先关注响应速度、利益相关者的关注、持续改进、团队自治、管理方法和团队整体效率,然后根据利益相关者对价值、响应速度和发布频率的满意度进行评估。为此,我们对 4013 个敏捷团队的 15078 名成员进行了全面调查,以衡量他们的有效性,同时还对其中 529 个团队的 1841 名利益相关者进行了满意度调查。我们进行了一系列推理统计分析,包括方差分析和多元线性回归,以确定任何显著差异,同时控制团队经验和组织规模。研究结果显示了一些显著的差异,但其程度和影响大小都可以忽略不计,不具有实际意义。总之,敏捷扩展策略的选择不会明显影响团队的有效性,建议组织选择一种最符合其以往敏捷经验、组织文化和管理风格的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Empirical Software Engineering
Empirical Software Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
12.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Empirical Software Engineering provides a forum for applied software engineering research with a strong empirical component, and a venue for publishing empirical results relevant to both researchers and practitioners. Empirical studies presented here usually involve the collection and analysis of data and experience that can be used to characterize, evaluate and reveal relationships between software development deliverables, practices, and technologies. Over time, it is expected that such empirical results will form a body of knowledge leading to widely accepted and well-formed theories. The journal also offers industrial experience reports detailing the application of software technologies - processes, methods, or tools - and their effectiveness in industrial settings. Empirical Software Engineering promotes the publication of industry-relevant research, to address the significant gap between research and practice.
期刊最新文献
The effect of data complexity on classifier performance. Reinforcement learning for online testing of autonomous driving systems: a replication and extension study. An empirical study on developers’ shared conversations with ChatGPT in GitHub pull requests and issues Quality issues in machine learning software systems An empirical study of token-based micro commits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1