Change in Defense Mechanisms During a Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1097/NMD.0000000000001770
Viviane Porto Tabeleão, Carolina Coelho Scholl, Katharina Pereira Kammer, Mariana Bonati de Matos, Jéssica Puchalski Trettim, Rafaelle Stark Stigger, Andressa Jacondino Pires, Luciana de Avila Quevedo
{"title":"Change in Defense Mechanisms During a Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.","authors":"Viviane Porto Tabeleão, Carolina Coelho Scholl, Katharina Pereira Kammer, Mariana Bonati de Matos, Jéssica Puchalski Trettim, Rafaelle Stark Stigger, Andressa Jacondino Pires, Luciana de Avila Quevedo","doi":"10.1097/NMD.0000000000001770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Defense mechanisms (DMs) are strategies used by the individuals to protect the ego. Therefore, compulsive behaviors in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) can be recognized as DMs. We analyzed how DMs changed in a brief cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for OCD. This was a quasi-experimental study with 92 OCD patients (aged 18-60 years). We used the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview to confirm OCD diagnosis, and we assessed the DMs with the Defense Style Questionnaire at three time points. Through a latent change score modeling, we found that the mature mechanism presented a constant change during the therapy. This mechanism increased in average 0.37 points at each measured moment of CBT, showing a linear trajectory. Neurotic and immature mechanisms showed no significant changes during therapy. The increased use of the mature mechanism can be an indicator of improvement in OCD treatment, showing that patients intensified their more adaptive responses to conflicts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16480,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease","volume":"212 6","pages":"347-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Defense mechanisms (DMs) are strategies used by the individuals to protect the ego. Therefore, compulsive behaviors in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) can be recognized as DMs. We analyzed how DMs changed in a brief cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for OCD. This was a quasi-experimental study with 92 OCD patients (aged 18-60 years). We used the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview to confirm OCD diagnosis, and we assessed the DMs with the Defense Style Questionnaire at three time points. Through a latent change score modeling, we found that the mature mechanism presented a constant change during the therapy. This mechanism increased in average 0.37 points at each measured moment of CBT, showing a linear trajectory. Neurotic and immature mechanisms showed no significant changes during therapy. The increased use of the mature mechanism can be an indicator of improvement in OCD treatment, showing that patients intensified their more adaptive responses to conflicts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强迫症简短认知行为疗法中防御机制的变化。
摘要:防御机制(DM)是个体用来保护自我的策略。因此,强迫症(OCD)中的强迫行为可被视为防御机制。我们分析了在针对强迫症的简短认知行为疗法(CBT)中,DM是如何变化的。这是一项针对 92 名强迫症患者(18-60 岁)的准实验研究。我们使用迷你国际神经精神访谈确认了强迫症诊断,并在三个时间点使用防御风格问卷评估了 DMs。通过潜在变化得分建模,我们发现成熟机制在治疗过程中呈现持续变化。这种机制在 CBT 的每个测量时刻平均增加 0.37 分,呈现出线性轨迹。神经质机制和不成熟机制在治疗过程中没有明显变化。成熟机制使用的增加可以作为强迫症治疗改善的指标,表明患者加强了对冲突的适应性反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease publishes peer-reviewed articles containing new data or ways of reorganizing established knowledge relevant to understanding and modifying human behavior, especially that defined as impaired or diseased, and the context, applications and effects of that knowledge. Our policy is summarized by the slogan, "Behavioral science for clinical practice." We consider articles that include at least one behavioral variable, clear definition of study populations, and replicable research designs. Authors should use the active voice and first person whenever possible.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Piano Game-Based Learning on the Mental Health of Elderly Individuals. Effectiveness of Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Quality of Life and Psychological Wellbeing of Patients With Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Associations Between Epistemic Trust and the Severity of Personality Disorder: Results From a Study Comparing Patients With Personality Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Controls. Association of the DRD and OXT Genetic Polymorphisms With Schizophrenia in a Chinese Population. Symptoms Profile and Psychopathological Correlates of (Hypo)Manic and Depressive Symptoms in Saudis With Bipolar Disorder: Preliminary Evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1