Digitization of Transaction Terms within TCE: Strong Smart Contract as a New Mode of Transaction Governance

IF 7 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Mis Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.25300/misq/2023/17818
Hanna Halaburda, Natalia Levina, Semi Min
{"title":"Digitization of Transaction Terms within TCE: Strong Smart Contract as a New Mode of Transaction Governance","authors":"Hanna Halaburda, Natalia Levina, Semi Min","doi":"10.25300/misq/2023/17818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<style>#html-body [data-pb-style=IF9941U]{justify-content:flex-start;display:flex;flex-direction:column;background-position:left top;background-size:cover;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-attachment:scroll}</style>We use transaction cost economics (TCE) to define the “digitization of transaction terms” shift parameter that describes the institutional changes associated with increased digitization in society. We then draw on legal scholarship to analyze how strong smart contracts, which refer to agreements with automatic execution and enforcement that are not reversible by courts, rely on a new level of digitization of transaction terms. Specifically, these contracts may rely on standard digital infrastructures such as blockchain systems that guarantee automatic execution and non-reversibility. Strong smart contracts represent a distinct mode of transaction governance compared to markets, hierarchies, or hybrids. This is because each classic governance mode is distinguished by how ex post adaptation is handled—through public courts, managerial fiat, or both. In contrast, strong smart contracts prevent ex post adaptation altogether. We propose that when strong smart contracts can be fully specified, they may dominate other governance modes based on certain trade-offs. These trade-offs include weighing the benefits of avoiding the holdup problem and lowering contract enforcement costs against the downsides of high ex ante specification costs and the elimination of flexibility to make ex post adjustments in a changing environment. Our discussion elaborates on which institutional conditions can further facilitate this institutional shift.","PeriodicalId":49807,"journal":{"name":"Mis Quarterly","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mis Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2023/17818","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We use transaction cost economics (TCE) to define the “digitization of transaction terms” shift parameter that describes the institutional changes associated with increased digitization in society. We then draw on legal scholarship to analyze how strong smart contracts, which refer to agreements with automatic execution and enforcement that are not reversible by courts, rely on a new level of digitization of transaction terms. Specifically, these contracts may rely on standard digital infrastructures such as blockchain systems that guarantee automatic execution and non-reversibility. Strong smart contracts represent a distinct mode of transaction governance compared to markets, hierarchies, or hybrids. This is because each classic governance mode is distinguished by how ex post adaptation is handled—through public courts, managerial fiat, or both. In contrast, strong smart contracts prevent ex post adaptation altogether. We propose that when strong smart contracts can be fully specified, they may dominate other governance modes based on certain trade-offs. These trade-offs include weighing the benefits of avoiding the holdup problem and lowering contract enforcement costs against the downsides of high ex ante specification costs and the elimination of flexibility to make ex post adjustments in a changing environment. Our discussion elaborates on which institutional conditions can further facilitate this institutional shift.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TCE 内交易条款的数字化:作为交易治理新模式的强大智能合约
#html-body [data-pb-style=IF9941U]{justify-content:flex-start;display:flex;flex-direction:column;background-position:left top;background-size:cover;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-attachment:scroll} 我们利用交易成本经济学(TCE)定义了 "交易条款数字化 "转变参数,该参数描述了与社会数字化程度提高相关的制度变化。然后,我们借鉴法律学术研究,分析强智能合约(指法院无法逆转的自动执行和强制执行的协议)如何依赖于交易条款数字化的新水平。具体来说,这些合约可能依赖于标准的数字基础设施,如区块链系统,以保证自动执行和不可逆转性。与市场、等级制度或混合模式相比,强智能合约代表了一种独特的交易治理模式。这是因为,每种典型的治理模式都是通过事后适应的方式来区分的--通过公共法庭、管理者命令或两者兼而有之。相比之下,强智能合约则完全避免了事后调整。我们建议,当强智能合约可以完全具体化时,它们可能会在某些权衡的基础上主导其他治理模式。这些权衡包括权衡避免搁置问题和降低合约执行成本的好处,以及事前规范成本高和无法在不断变化的环境中进行事后调整的弊端。我们在讨论中阐述了哪些制度条件可以进一步促进这种制度转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mis Quarterly
Mis Quarterly 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal Name: MIS Quarterly Editorial Objective: The editorial objective of MIS Quarterly is focused on: Enhancing and communicating knowledge related to: Development of IT-based services Management of IT resources Use, impact, and economics of IT with managerial, organizational, and societal implications Addressing professional issues affecting the Information Systems (IS) field as a whole Key Focus Areas: Development of IT-based services Management of IT resources Use, impact, and economics of IT with managerial, organizational, and societal implications Professional issues affecting the IS field as a whole
期刊最新文献
Engaging Users on Social Media Business Pages: The Roles of User Comments and Firm Responses Digitization of Transaction Terms within TCE: Strong Smart Contract as a New Mode of Transaction Governance Dealing with Complexity in Design Science Research: A Methodology Using Design Echelons Data Commoning in the Life Sciences Understanding the Returns from Integrated Enterprise Systems: The Impacts of Agile and Phased Implementation Strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1