Generativity and Profitability on B2B Innovation Platforms: A Simulation-based Theory Development

IF 7 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Mis Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.25300/misq/2023/17710
Kazem Haki, Hüseyin Tanriverdi, Dorsa Safaei, Marius Schmid, Stephan Aier, Robert Winter
{"title":"Generativity and Profitability on B2B Innovation Platforms: A Simulation-based Theory Development","authors":"Kazem Haki, Hüseyin Tanriverdi, Dorsa Safaei, Marius Schmid, Stephan Aier, Robert Winter","doi":"10.25300/misq/2023/17710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<style>#html-body [data-pb-style=UMN4FGV]{justify-content:flex-start;display:flex;flex-direction:column;background-position:left top;background-size:cover;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-attachment:scroll}</style>Firms generate innovations to profit from market opportunities, which are newly identified customer needs not yet being met in the market. The rising complexity of market opportunities requires collaboration among multiple partner firms. However, this multipartner collaboration increases transaction and production costs when generating innovations. To address these challenges, incumbents build B2B innovation platforms with mechanisms to reduce partners’ transaction and production costs. We do not yet know if and when partners would choose to use the incumbent’s traditional service innovation model or the B2B innovation platform and how this choice would affect the generativity and profitability of innovations for the incumbent and the partners. We used agent-based modeling and simulation to develop a theory to address these questions. We found that the complexity of market opportunities interacts with the B2B innovation platform’s transaction and production mechanisms to jointly affect whether partners use the platform and when the incumbent and partners achieve generativity and profitability. When the complexity of market opportunities is low, partners use the traditional service innovation model. As complexity increases to medium or high levels, partners begin to use the B2B innovation platform mechanisms to address the transaction and production challenges presented by the complexity of market opportunities. However, there are limits to how much the platform mechanisms can address these challenges. The complexity of market opportunities inhibits the emergence of network effects on B2B innovation platforms and limits the generativity and profitability of platform partners. There are diminishing benefits of investing in the platform’s transaction and production mechanisms, and complexity affects whether the platform owner or the partners profit from innovations generated on the platform.","PeriodicalId":49807,"journal":{"name":"Mis Quarterly","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mis Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2023/17710","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Firms generate innovations to profit from market opportunities, which are newly identified customer needs not yet being met in the market. The rising complexity of market opportunities requires collaboration among multiple partner firms. However, this multipartner collaboration increases transaction and production costs when generating innovations. To address these challenges, incumbents build B2B innovation platforms with mechanisms to reduce partners’ transaction and production costs. We do not yet know if and when partners would choose to use the incumbent’s traditional service innovation model or the B2B innovation platform and how this choice would affect the generativity and profitability of innovations for the incumbent and the partners. We used agent-based modeling and simulation to develop a theory to address these questions. We found that the complexity of market opportunities interacts with the B2B innovation platform’s transaction and production mechanisms to jointly affect whether partners use the platform and when the incumbent and partners achieve generativity and profitability. When the complexity of market opportunities is low, partners use the traditional service innovation model. As complexity increases to medium or high levels, partners begin to use the B2B innovation platform mechanisms to address the transaction and production challenges presented by the complexity of market opportunities. However, there are limits to how much the platform mechanisms can address these challenges. The complexity of market opportunities inhibits the emergence of network effects on B2B innovation platforms and limits the generativity and profitability of platform partners. There are diminishing benefits of investing in the platform’s transaction and production mechanisms, and complexity affects whether the platform owner or the partners profit from innovations generated on the platform.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
B2B 创新平台的生成性和盈利性:基于模拟的理论发展
#html-body [data-pb-style=UMN4FGV]{justify-content:flex-start;display:flex;flex-direction:column;background-position:left top;background-size:cover;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-attachment:scroll} 企业进行创新是为了从市场机遇中获利,而市场机遇是新发现的、市场上尚未满足的客户需求。市场机遇的复杂性不断增加,这就需要多个伙伴公司之间开展合作。然而,这种多伙伴合作会增加创新时的交易和生产成本。为了应对这些挑战,现有企业建立了具有降低合作伙伴交易和生产成本机制的 B2B 创新平台。我们还不知道合作伙伴是否以及何时会选择使用现有企业的传统服务创新模式或 B2B 创新平台,也不知道这种选择会如何影响现有企业和合作伙伴的创新产生率和盈利能力。我们利用基于代理的建模和模拟来建立理论,以解决这些问题。我们发现,市场机会的复杂性与 B2B 创新平台的交易和生产机制相互作用,共同影响合作伙伴是否使用该平台,以及在位者和合作伙伴何时实现创新的生成性和盈利性。当市场机会的复杂程度较低时,合作伙伴会使用传统的服务创新模式。当复杂性上升到中等或较高水平时,合作伙伴开始使用 B2B 创新平台机制来应对市场机会复杂性带来的交易和生产挑战。然而,平台机制应对这些挑战的能力是有限的。市场机会的复杂性抑制了企业对企业创新平台网络效应的出现,限制了平台合作伙伴的创造力和盈利能力。对平台的交易和生产机制进行投资的收益会递减,而且复杂性会影响平台所有者或合作伙伴从平台上产生的创新中获利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mis Quarterly
Mis Quarterly 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal Name: MIS Quarterly Editorial Objective: The editorial objective of MIS Quarterly is focused on: Enhancing and communicating knowledge related to: Development of IT-based services Management of IT resources Use, impact, and economics of IT with managerial, organizational, and societal implications Addressing professional issues affecting the Information Systems (IS) field as a whole Key Focus Areas: Development of IT-based services Management of IT resources Use, impact, and economics of IT with managerial, organizational, and societal implications Professional issues affecting the IS field as a whole
期刊最新文献
Engaging Users on Social Media Business Pages: The Roles of User Comments and Firm Responses Digitization of Transaction Terms within TCE: Strong Smart Contract as a New Mode of Transaction Governance Dealing with Complexity in Design Science Research: A Methodology Using Design Echelons Data Commoning in the Life Sciences Understanding the Returns from Integrated Enterprise Systems: The Impacts of Agile and Phased Implementation Strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1