Effectiveness of educational interventions: An ecological systems analysis of initiatives from the UK opportunity areas programme

Sara Spear, Phil Kirkman
{"title":"Effectiveness of educational interventions: An ecological systems analysis of initiatives from the UK opportunity areas programme","authors":"Sara Spear, Phil Kirkman","doi":"10.1002/berj.4038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Government interventions to address inequalities in education are common in the United Kingdom and internationally. Whilst there is a tendency for policy discourse to focus on benchmarks and indicators as measures of educational success, the inclusiveness and effectiveness of government interventions in education has been questioned. This paper uses the ecological systems perspective as a way of analysing how government interventions may, or may not, lead to real impact on young people's educational outcomes. Two case studies are presented on projects funded as part of the opportunity areas (OA) programme in England to tackle barriers to learning for young people: Ipswich ‘Learning Behaviour Leads’ and Norwich ‘Engagement Coaches’. The research team carried out an evaluation of these projects in seven schools, using a mixed methods approach which involved interviews and reflective journals by the staff delivering the projects (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 7), interviews with members of the school senior leadership teams (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 7), an online survey with teachers (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 23) and focus groups with young people involved in the projects (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 14). The evaluation found that although there was shared understanding of the purpose and priorities of the OA programme between the macro and exosystems, there were tensions between these and the microsystem, and a lack of interconnection with the mesosystem. Whilst the projects benefited the young people involved, they fell short of the initial intentions to foster engagement amongst the most at‐risk groups, and failed to address the macro aims of fostering a pan‐system response.","PeriodicalId":501494,"journal":{"name":"British Educational Research Journal ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Educational Research Journal ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Government interventions to address inequalities in education are common in the United Kingdom and internationally. Whilst there is a tendency for policy discourse to focus on benchmarks and indicators as measures of educational success, the inclusiveness and effectiveness of government interventions in education has been questioned. This paper uses the ecological systems perspective as a way of analysing how government interventions may, or may not, lead to real impact on young people's educational outcomes. Two case studies are presented on projects funded as part of the opportunity areas (OA) programme in England to tackle barriers to learning for young people: Ipswich ‘Learning Behaviour Leads’ and Norwich ‘Engagement Coaches’. The research team carried out an evaluation of these projects in seven schools, using a mixed methods approach which involved interviews and reflective journals by the staff delivering the projects (n = 7), interviews with members of the school senior leadership teams (n = 7), an online survey with teachers (n = 23) and focus groups with young people involved in the projects (n = 14). The evaluation found that although there was shared understanding of the purpose and priorities of the OA programme between the macro and exosystems, there were tensions between these and the microsystem, and a lack of interconnection with the mesosystem. Whilst the projects benefited the young people involved, they fell short of the initial intentions to foster engagement amongst the most at‐risk groups, and failed to address the macro aims of fostering a pan‐system response.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育干预措施的有效性:对英国 "机会领域计划 "的各项举措进行生态系统分析
政府为解决教育不平等问题而采取的干预措施在英国和国际上都很常见。虽然政策讨论倾向于将基准和指标作为衡量教育成功的标准,但政府干预教育的包容性和有效性一直受到质疑。本文采用生态系统论的视角,分析政府干预措施如何可能或不可能对青少年的教育成果产生真正的影响。本文介绍了两个案例研究,涉及作为英格兰机会领域(OA)计划的一部分而获得资助的项目,这些项目旨在解决青少年的学习障碍:伊普斯维奇 "学习行为领导 "和诺里奇 "参与教练"。研究小组采用混合方法对七所学校的这些项目进行了评估,包括对项目实施人员的访谈和反思日记(7 人)、对学校高级领导团队成员的访谈(7 人)、对教师的在线调查(23 人)以及对参与项目的青少年的焦点小组(14 人)。评估发现,尽管宏观系统和外在系统对开放式学习计划的目的和优先事项有共同的 理解,但宏观系统和微观系统之间存在紧张关系,而且缺乏与中间系统的相互联系。虽然这些项目使参与其中的年轻人受益,但却没有达到促进高危群体参与的初衷,也未能实现促进泛系统响应的宏观目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reshaping curriculum adaptation in the age of artificial intelligence: Mapping teachers' AI‐driven curriculum adaptation patterns Physical education in alternative provision schools: A case of spatial (in)justice? The ‘Friday effect’: School attendance over the weeki From challenge to innovation: A grassroots study of teachers’ classroom assessment innovations Math task experiences and motivation to learn more: How prior knowledge and interest interact with Task‐Interest & Task‐Difficulty perceptions and feed a desire to reengage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1