Prognosis and treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European journal of preventive cardiology Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1093/eurjpc/zwae185
Tobias Schupp, Alexander Schmitt, Marielen Reinhardt, Noah Abel, Felix Lau, Mohammad Abumayyaleh, Jonas Dudda, Kathrin Weidner, Mohamed Ayoub, Muharrem Akin, Julian Müller, Ibrahim Akin, Michael Behnes
{"title":"Prognosis and treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction.","authors":"Tobias Schupp, Alexander Schmitt, Marielen Reinhardt, Noah Abel, Felix Lau, Mohammad Abumayyaleh, Jonas Dudda, Kathrin Weidner, Mohamed Ayoub, Muharrem Akin, Julian Müller, Ibrahim Akin, Michael Behnes","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study investigates the prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Data concerning the prognostic impact of AF in patients with HFmrEF is scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Consecutive patients with HFmrEF [i.e. left ventricular ejection fraction 41-49% and signs and/or symptoms of heart failure (HF)] were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. Patients with AF were compared with patients without with regard to the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF-related rehospitalization at 30 months (median follow-up). Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier, multivariable Cox proportional regression analyses, and propensity score matching. A total of 2148 patients with HFmrEF were included with an overall prevalence of AF of 43%. The presence of AF was associated with a higher risk of the primary composite endpoint all-cause mortality and HF-related rehospitalization at 30 months [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.068; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.802-2.375; P = 0.01], which was confirmed after propensity score matching (HR = 1.494; 95% CI 1.216-1.835; P = 0.01). AF was an independent predictor of both all-cause mortality (HR = 1.340; 95% CI 1.066-1.685; P = 0.01) and HF-related rehospitalization (HR = 2.061; 95% CI 1.538-2.696; P = 0.01). Finally, rhythm control may be associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with rate control for AF (HR = 0.342; 95% CI 0.199-0.587; P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Atrial fibrillation affects 43% of patients with HFmrEF and represents an independent predictor of adverse long-term prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The study investigates the prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Data concerning the prognostic impact of AF in patients with HFmrEF is scarce.

Methods and results: Consecutive patients with HFmrEF [i.e. left ventricular ejection fraction 41-49% and signs and/or symptoms of heart failure (HF)] were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. Patients with AF were compared with patients without with regard to the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF-related rehospitalization at 30 months (median follow-up). Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier, multivariable Cox proportional regression analyses, and propensity score matching. A total of 2148 patients with HFmrEF were included with an overall prevalence of AF of 43%. The presence of AF was associated with a higher risk of the primary composite endpoint all-cause mortality and HF-related rehospitalization at 30 months [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.068; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.802-2.375; P = 0.01], which was confirmed after propensity score matching (HR = 1.494; 95% CI 1.216-1.835; P = 0.01). AF was an independent predictor of both all-cause mortality (HR = 1.340; 95% CI 1.066-1.685; P = 0.01) and HF-related rehospitalization (HR = 2.061; 95% CI 1.538-2.696; P = 0.01). Finally, rhythm control may be associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with rate control for AF (HR = 0.342; 95% CI 0.199-0.587; P = 0.01).

Conclusion: Atrial fibrillation affects 43% of patients with HFmrEF and represents an independent predictor of adverse long-term prognosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭患者心房颤动的预后和治疗策略。
研究目的该研究调查了射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)患者心房颤动(房颤)的预后情况:有关心房颤动对射血分数轻度降低的心衰患者预后影响的数据很少:方法:回顾性纳入一家机构2016年至2022年连续收治的HFmrEF患者(即左室射血分数41%-49%且有HF体征和/或症状)。房颤患者与非房颤患者的主要复合终点(全因死亡率和30个月(中位随访期)时的心房颤动相关再住院率)进行了比较。统计分析包括 Kaplan-Meier 分析、多变量 Cox 比例回归分析和倾向评分匹配。心房颤动的存在与主要复合终点全因死亡率和30个月时与心房颤动相关的再住院风险较高有关(HR = 2.068; 95% CI 1.802-2.375; p = 0.01),倾向得分匹配后证实了这一点(HR = 1.494; 95% CI 1.216-1.835; p = 0.01)。房颤是全因死亡率(HR = 1.340;95% CI 1.066-1.685;p = 0.01)和心房颤动相关再住院(HR = 2.061;95% CI 1.538-2.696;p = 0.01)的独立预测因素。最后,与心房颤动的心率控制相比,心律控制可能与较低的全因死亡风险相关(HR = 0.342; 95% CI 0.199-0.587; p = 0.01):心房颤动影响 43% 的高频心房颤动 (HFmrEF) 患者,是不良长期预后的独立预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
期刊最新文献
Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: projections from 2025 to 2050. EJPC @ a glance: focus issue on cardiovascular risk prediction in primary and secondary prevention. Effect of Behavior-change Interventions on Daily Physical Activity in Patients with Intermittent Claudication: The OPTIMA Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Cardiovascular risk estimation: can a risk prediction model derived in one country be used in another? Electrocardiographic and morphological cardiac remodeling in competitive female athletes - a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1