Reflections on the Slovenian Dictionary User Study of 2018: What does it tell us?

Alenka Vrbinc, Donna M. Farina, Marjeta Vrbinc
{"title":"Reflections on the Slovenian Dictionary User Study of 2018: What does it tell us?","authors":"Alenka Vrbinc, Donna M. Farina, Marjeta Vrbinc","doi":"10.24053/aaa-2024-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports on a qualitative study of dictionary use at the School of Economics and Business, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, during which nine students were given look-up tasks with the online Merriam–Webster Learner’s Dictionary. The study employed a combination of research methods: semi-structured oral interviews and the researchers’ direct observation of the participants as they looked up words. As the students completed these tasks, they were observed and questioned about their habits of dictionary use, their lookup experience, and their perceptions of the utility and quality of the dictionary definitions and examples. The results provide insight into the efficacy of the specific dictionary used. In addition, the study reveals much about how these students regard dictionaries and how they approach their use. Many of the participants had no relationship with dictionaries and no real understanding of their purpose. Their comments demonstrate that they are “demanding” users with very firm ideas and high expectations about the type of information they wish to receive in an online dictionary – and how they prefer to have it delivered. Some recommendations are made for those involved in learner lexicography concerning the improvement of part-of-speech information to make lookup easier, improvement of dictionary examples and improvement of the way dictionary information is presented. This paper also discusses what the takeaways are for concerned dictionary makers; in particular, it will reflect on how students should be taught about dictionaries today – if we still want them to use dictionaries tomorrow.","PeriodicalId":518754,"journal":{"name":"Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik","volume":"13 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24053/aaa-2024-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reports on a qualitative study of dictionary use at the School of Economics and Business, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, during which nine students were given look-up tasks with the online Merriam–Webster Learner’s Dictionary. The study employed a combination of research methods: semi-structured oral interviews and the researchers’ direct observation of the participants as they looked up words. As the students completed these tasks, they were observed and questioned about their habits of dictionary use, their lookup experience, and their perceptions of the utility and quality of the dictionary definitions and examples. The results provide insight into the efficacy of the specific dictionary used. In addition, the study reveals much about how these students regard dictionaries and how they approach their use. Many of the participants had no relationship with dictionaries and no real understanding of their purpose. Their comments demonstrate that they are “demanding” users with very firm ideas and high expectations about the type of information they wish to receive in an online dictionary – and how they prefer to have it delivered. Some recommendations are made for those involved in learner lexicography concerning the improvement of part-of-speech information to make lookup easier, improvement of dictionary examples and improvement of the way dictionary information is presented. This paper also discusses what the takeaways are for concerned dictionary makers; in particular, it will reflect on how students should be taught about dictionaries today – if we still want them to use dictionaries tomorrow.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 2018 年斯洛文尼亚词典用户研究的思考:它告诉了我们什么?
本文报告了在斯洛文尼亚卢布尔雅那大学经济与商业学院进行的一项词典使用定性研究,在此期间,九名学生承担了使用在线《梅里亚姆-韦伯斯特学习者词典》进行查词的任务。这项研究综合运用了多种研究方法:半结构式口头访谈和研究人员直接观察参与者查词的情况。在学生完成这些任务的过程中,研究人员观察并询问了他们使用词典的习惯、他们的查询经验以及他们对词典释义和例句的实用性和质量的看法。研究结果有助于深入了解所使用的特定词典的功效。此外,研究还揭示了这些学生如何看待字典以及如何使用字典。许多参与者与字典没有任何关系,也不真正了解字典的用途。他们的评论表明,他们是 "苛刻 "的用户,对于他们希望从在线词典中获得的信息类型--以及他们希望以何种方式提供这些信息--有着非常坚定的想法和很高的期望。本文就如何改进部分语音信息以方便查询、如何改进词典示例以及如何改进词典信息的呈现方式等问题向学习者词典学相关人员提出了一些建议。本文还讨论了相关词典编纂者的收获;特别是,本文将反思今天应如何向学生传授词典知识--如果我们希望他们明天仍然使用词典的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Concepts of film literacies in (English) Language Education Anthropocentrism in monolingual English learners’ dictionaries – Revisited Reflections on the Slovenian Dictionary User Study of 2018: What does it tell us? Schulenglisch: A multi-dimensional model of the variety of English taught in German secondary schools Benjamin Franklin and Gottfried Achenwall, Amerika 1766. Anmerkungen über Nordamerika, und über dasige Großbritannische Colonien. Published and commented by Heinrich Detering and Lisa Kunze. Wallstein, 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1