Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer, Miriam I Hehlmann, Julian A Rubel, Wolfgang Lutz, Brian Schwartz, Anne-Kathrin Bräscher, Hanna Christiansen, Lydia Fehm, Julia A Glombiewski, Jens Heider, Sylvia Helbig-Lang, Andrea Hermann, Jürgen Hoyer, Tina In-Albon, Tania Lincoln, Jürgen Margraf, Anne Katrin Risch, Henning Schöttke, Lars Schulze, Rudolf Stark, Tobias Teismann, Julia Velten, Ulrike Willutzki, Gabriele Wilz, Michael Witthöft, Patrizia Odyniec
{"title":"Love yourself as a therapist, doubt yourself as an institution? Therapist and institution effects on outcome, treatment length, and dropout.","authors":"Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer, Miriam I Hehlmann, Julian A Rubel, Wolfgang Lutz, Brian Schwartz, Anne-Kathrin Bräscher, Hanna Christiansen, Lydia Fehm, Julia A Glombiewski, Jens Heider, Sylvia Helbig-Lang, Andrea Hermann, Jürgen Hoyer, Tina In-Albon, Tania Lincoln, Jürgen Margraf, Anne Katrin Risch, Henning Schöttke, Lars Schulze, Rudolf Stark, Tobias Teismann, Julia Velten, Ulrike Willutzki, Gabriele Wilz, Michael Witthöft, Patrizia Odyniec","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2024.2352749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Research suggests that some therapists achieve better outcomes than others. However, an overlooked area of study is how institution differences impact patient outcomes independent of therapist variance. This study aimed to examine the role of institution and therapist differences in adult outpatient psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included 1428 patients who were treated by 196 therapists at 10 clinics. Two- and three-level hierarchical linear regression models were employed to investigate the effects of therapists and institutions on three dependent patient variables: (1) symptom change, (2) treatment duration, and (3) dropout. Level three explanatory variables were tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that therapist effects (TE) were significant for all three types of treatment outcome (7.8%-18.2%). When a third level (institution) was added to the model, the differences between therapists decreased, and significant institution effects (IE) were found: 6.3% for symptom change, 10.6% for treatment duration, and 6.5% for dropout. The exploratory analyses found no predictors able to explain the systematic variation at the institution level.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>TE on psychotherapy outcomes remain a relevant factor but may have been overestimated in previous studies due to not properly distinguishing them from differences at the institution level.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2352749","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Research suggests that some therapists achieve better outcomes than others. However, an overlooked area of study is how institution differences impact patient outcomes independent of therapist variance. This study aimed to examine the role of institution and therapist differences in adult outpatient psychotherapy.
Method: The study included 1428 patients who were treated by 196 therapists at 10 clinics. Two- and three-level hierarchical linear regression models were employed to investigate the effects of therapists and institutions on three dependent patient variables: (1) symptom change, (2) treatment duration, and (3) dropout. Level three explanatory variables were tested.
Results: The results showed that therapist effects (TE) were significant for all three types of treatment outcome (7.8%-18.2%). When a third level (institution) was added to the model, the differences between therapists decreased, and significant institution effects (IE) were found: 6.3% for symptom change, 10.6% for treatment duration, and 6.5% for dropout. The exploratory analyses found no predictors able to explain the systematic variation at the institution level.
Discussion: TE on psychotherapy outcomes remain a relevant factor but may have been overestimated in previous studies due to not properly distinguishing them from differences at the institution level.
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.