{"title":"Therapists' emotional responses and their relation to patients' experience of attunement and responsiveness.","authors":"Maayan Abargil, Avital Schenkolewski, Orya Tishby","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2024.2403422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Therapists' emotional responses play a significant role in the therapeutic relationship and in the therapy process. The current study examined the associations between therapists' emotional responses <i>before</i> and <i>after</i> therapy sessions, and patients' experience of them as attuned and responsive.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty patient-therapist dyads participated in 16 weekly sessions of Supportive Expressive Psychotherapy. Therapists' emotions were assessed on the Feeling Word Checklist-58. We examined one positive feeling (Parental) and one negative feeling (Inadequate) Following each session, patients and therapists rated responsiveness on the Patient's Experience of Attunement and Responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feeling Parental before sessions was associated with patients' post-session ratings of therapist empathy, but not with session helpfulness or sensed achievement. Therapists' feelings of inadequacy before sessions were negatively associated with patients' ratings of helpfulness and achievement, but not with empathy. Therapists' Parental feelings <i>after</i> the session were positively associated with patients' ratings and their own ratings on all 3 PEAR subscales. Feeling Inadequate after the session was negatively associated with patients' ratings of helpfulness, achievement and empathy. Therapists' ratings were only negatively associated only with helpfulness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrates that therapists' emotional reactions play a role in their patients' experience of their responsiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2403422","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Therapists' emotional responses play a significant role in the therapeutic relationship and in the therapy process. The current study examined the associations between therapists' emotional responses before and after therapy sessions, and patients' experience of them as attuned and responsive.
Method: Forty patient-therapist dyads participated in 16 weekly sessions of Supportive Expressive Psychotherapy. Therapists' emotions were assessed on the Feeling Word Checklist-58. We examined one positive feeling (Parental) and one negative feeling (Inadequate) Following each session, patients and therapists rated responsiveness on the Patient's Experience of Attunement and Responsiveness.
Results: Feeling Parental before sessions was associated with patients' post-session ratings of therapist empathy, but not with session helpfulness or sensed achievement. Therapists' feelings of inadequacy before sessions were negatively associated with patients' ratings of helpfulness and achievement, but not with empathy. Therapists' Parental feelings after the session were positively associated with patients' ratings and their own ratings on all 3 PEAR subscales. Feeling Inadequate after the session was negatively associated with patients' ratings of helpfulness, achievement and empathy. Therapists' ratings were only negatively associated only with helpfulness.
Conclusion: The study demonstrates that therapists' emotional reactions play a role in their patients' experience of their responsiveness.
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.