Evaluating Efficacy and Usability of Screen-Based Simulation in Difficult Airway Algorithm Training for Certified Registered Nurse Anesthesiologists

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101550
Cheng Tan BSN, RN , Suzan Kardong-Edgren PhD, RN, ANEF, CHSE, FSSH, FAAN , Nicole Petsas Blodgett PhD, RN, CHSE , Virginia C. Simmons DNP, CRNA, CHSE-A, FAANA, FAAN
{"title":"Evaluating Efficacy and Usability of Screen-Based Simulation in Difficult Airway Algorithm Training for Certified Registered Nurse Anesthesiologists","authors":"Cheng Tan BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Suzan Kardong-Edgren PhD, RN, ANEF, CHSE, FSSH, FAAN ,&nbsp;Nicole Petsas Blodgett PhD, RN, CHSE ,&nbsp;Virginia C. Simmons DNP, CRNA, CHSE-A, FAANA, FAAN","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>\"Cannot ventilate, cannot intubate\" is a challenging airway emergency that can lead to negative patient outcomes. Screen-based simulation (SBS) as a learning adjunct could help anesthesia providers improve decision-making skills in difficult airway situations. The goal of this project was to evaluate the usability of a newly designed SBS for learning and reinforcing difficult airway management.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seven anesthesia and simulation experts were recruited for this pre-post design project. Participants were pre-briefed, watched scenario one, selected interventions for difficult airway, and time-to-decision was recorded. After debriefing, participants completed a second scenario and time-to-decision was recorded again. A post-simulation survey was conducted to evaluate application usability and gather participant feedback.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All seven participants (100%) completed simulations with a mean System Usability Score of 90.83 (SD = 6.65) and median score of 90, both of which indicated superior usability. The time-to-decision in scenario two decreased significantly (<em>p</em> &lt; .05) between the two scenarios.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In approximately 40 hours and on a low budget, a user-friendly SBS was developed to effectively improve time-to-decision in difficult airway situations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000422","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

"Cannot ventilate, cannot intubate" is a challenging airway emergency that can lead to negative patient outcomes. Screen-based simulation (SBS) as a learning adjunct could help anesthesia providers improve decision-making skills in difficult airway situations. The goal of this project was to evaluate the usability of a newly designed SBS for learning and reinforcing difficult airway management.

Methods

Seven anesthesia and simulation experts were recruited for this pre-post design project. Participants were pre-briefed, watched scenario one, selected interventions for difficult airway, and time-to-decision was recorded. After debriefing, participants completed a second scenario and time-to-decision was recorded again. A post-simulation survey was conducted to evaluate application usability and gather participant feedback.

Results

All seven participants (100%) completed simulations with a mean System Usability Score of 90.83 (SD = 6.65) and median score of 90, both of which indicated superior usability. The time-to-decision in scenario two decreased significantly (p < .05) between the two scenarios.

Conclusion

In approximately 40 hours and on a low budget, a user-friendly SBS was developed to effectively improve time-to-decision in difficult airway situations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估基于屏幕的模拟在注册麻醉师困难气道算法培训中的有效性和可用性
背景 "无法通气,无法插管 "是一种具有挑战性的气道紧急情况,可导致患者出现不良后果。基于屏幕的模拟(SBS)作为一种辅助学习手段,可帮助麻醉医师提高在困难气道情况下的决策技能。本项目旨在评估新设计的 SBS 在学习和强化困难气道管理方面的可用性。参与者预先听取了汇报,观看了情景一,选择了困难气道的干预措施,并记录了做出决定的时间。听取汇报后,参与者完成第二个情景模拟,并再次记录做出决定的时间。结果 所有七名参与者(100%)都完成了模拟,平均系统可用性得分为 90.83 分(标准差 = 6.65),中位数为 90 分,这两个分数都表明可用性极佳。结论 在大约 40 个小时的时间内,以较低的预算开发出了用户友好型 SBS,有效地改善了困难气道情况下的决策时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
期刊最新文献
Embracing quick response technology to bring assessments to life during simulation Combining storytelling and a scenario re-enactment of Mt. Everest expeditions to practice cognitive and social skills Psychometric Testing of NASA-TLX to Measure Learners’ Cognitive Load in Individual and Group Nursing Simulations Becoming a team player: Evaluating a simulation interprofessional activity between third year nursing students and second year medical radiation science students - A feasibility study Interprofessional Learning for Nursing Students during a Mass Casualty Incident Simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1