Consistency in climate change impact reports among indigenous peoples and local communities depends on site contexts

Christoph Schunko, Santiago Álvarez-Fernández, Petra Benyei, Laura Calvet-Mir, André B. Junqueira, Xiaoyue Li, Anna Porcuna-Ferrer, Anna Schlingmann, Emmanuel M. N. A. N. Attoh, Rosario Carmona, Fasco Chengula, Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares, Priyatma Singh, Miquel Torrents-Ticó, Victoria Reyes-García
{"title":"Consistency in climate change impact reports among indigenous peoples and local communities depends on site contexts","authors":"Christoph Schunko, Santiago Álvarez-Fernández, Petra Benyei, Laura Calvet-Mir, André B. Junqueira, Xiaoyue Li, Anna Porcuna-Ferrer, Anna Schlingmann, Emmanuel M. N. A. N. Attoh, Rosario Carmona, Fasco Chengula, Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares, Priyatma Singh, Miquel Torrents-Ticó, Victoria Reyes-García","doi":"10.1038/s44168-024-00124-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indigenous Peoples and local communities are heavily affected by climatic changes. Investigating local understandings of climate change impacts, and their patterned distribution, is essential to effectively support monitoring and adaptation strategies. In this study, we aimed to understand the consistency in climate change impact reports and factors influencing consistency at site and individual levels. We conducted cross-cultural research among iTaukei (Fiji), Dagomba (Ghana), fisherfolks (Tanzania), Tsimane’ (Bolivia), Bassari (Senegal), ribeirinhos (Brazil), Mapuche (Chile), Mongolian (China), Tibetan (China) and Daasanach (Kenya) communities using semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and surveys among 1860 individuals. We found that cross-culturally more than two-thirds of individual reports of climate change impacts match site-confirmed reports. Consistency in reports is higher for changes related to pastoralism than crop production and wild plant gathering. Individual’s experience with nature, Indigenous and local knowledge, and local family roots are not significantly associated with consistency across sites, but site-specific associations are prevalent. Despite high average consistency among sites, there is considerable variation caused by site-specific factors, including livelihood activities, socio-cultural settings, and environmental conditions. Site contexts and related consistency in climate change impact reports need to be taken into account for climate change monitoring and adaptation planning.","PeriodicalId":186004,"journal":{"name":"npj Climate Action","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00124-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Climate Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00124-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indigenous Peoples and local communities are heavily affected by climatic changes. Investigating local understandings of climate change impacts, and their patterned distribution, is essential to effectively support monitoring and adaptation strategies. In this study, we aimed to understand the consistency in climate change impact reports and factors influencing consistency at site and individual levels. We conducted cross-cultural research among iTaukei (Fiji), Dagomba (Ghana), fisherfolks (Tanzania), Tsimane’ (Bolivia), Bassari (Senegal), ribeirinhos (Brazil), Mapuche (Chile), Mongolian (China), Tibetan (China) and Daasanach (Kenya) communities using semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and surveys among 1860 individuals. We found that cross-culturally more than two-thirds of individual reports of climate change impacts match site-confirmed reports. Consistency in reports is higher for changes related to pastoralism than crop production and wild plant gathering. Individual’s experience with nature, Indigenous and local knowledge, and local family roots are not significantly associated with consistency across sites, but site-specific associations are prevalent. Despite high average consistency among sites, there is considerable variation caused by site-specific factors, including livelihood activities, socio-cultural settings, and environmental conditions. Site contexts and related consistency in climate change impact reports need to be taken into account for climate change monitoring and adaptation planning.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土著人民和当地社区气候变化影响报告的一致性取决于现场情况
原住民和当地社区深受气候变化的影响。调查当地对气候变化影响的理解及其分布模式,对于有效支持监测和适应战略至关重要。在这项研究中,我们旨在了解气候变化影响报告的一致性,以及在地点和个人层面上影响一致性的因素。我们在 iTaukei(斐济)、Dagomba(加纳)、fisherfolks(坦桑尼亚)、Tsimane'(玻利维亚)、Bassari(塞内加尔)、ribeirinhos(巴西)、Mapuche(智利)、蒙古(中国)、西藏(中国)和 Daasanach(肯尼亚)社区中开展了跨文化研究,使用了半结构式访谈、焦点小组和对 1860 人的调查。我们发现,在不同文化背景下,三分之二以上关于气候变化影响的个人报告与现场确认的报告一致。与农作物生产和野生植物采集相比,与畜牧业相关的变化报告的一致性更高。个人对大自然的体验、土著和地方知识以及当地家庭根基与不同地点的一致性没有显著关联,但与具体地点的关联却很普遍。尽管不同地点之间的平均一致性较高,但地点特定因素(包括生计活动、社会文化背景和环境条件)造成的差异也相当大。在气候变化监测和适应规划中,需要考虑地点背景和气候变化影响报告中的相关一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What, how and where: an assessment of multi-level European climate mitigation policies Applications of generative artificial intelligence to influence climate change decisions Shifting and sharing power in urban climate justice work: experiments in transformative learning in Vancouver, Canada Author Correction: From countercultural ecovillages to mainstream green neighbourhoods—a view on current trends in Denmark Divergence over solutions to adapt or transform Australia’s Great Barrier Reef
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1