Comparison of alpha-2 agonist versus alpha-1 antagonist for post-traumatic stress disorder-associated nightmares in pediatric patients.

The mental health clinician Pub Date : 2024-06-03 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.9740/mhc.2024.06.199
Seher Khalid, Sandra Mitchell, Cheryl Al-Mateen
{"title":"Comparison of alpha-2 agonist versus alpha-1 antagonist for post-traumatic stress disorder-associated nightmares in pediatric patients.","authors":"Seher Khalid, Sandra Mitchell, Cheryl Al-Mateen","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2024.06.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children and adolescents has a high prevalence of accompanying sleep disturbances. Currently, pediatric treatment of PTSD-related nightmares is extrapolated from adult studies. This study aims to determine the effectiveness and safety of clonidine and guanfacine compared with prazosin for the treatment of PTSD-related nightmares.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-center, medical record review of patients 5 to 17 years old admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit from January 2015 to September 2021. Patients with a new initiation of an alpha-2 agonist (clonidine or guanfacine) or an alpha-1 antagonist (prazosin) with a diagnosis of PTSD, other trauma- or stressor-related disorder or unspecified anxiety disorder were included. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with a decrease in the frequency of nightmares.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 59 patients were included in the study: 37 in the alpha-2 agonist group and 22 in the alpha-1 antagonist group. There was no statistically significant difference in reduction of nightmares with both groups having a high percentage of patients showing response (alpha-2 agonist: 91.9%, alpha-1 antagonist: 86.4%). Time to decrease in nightmares was comparable between groups with a relatively quick onset. Within the alpha-2 agonist group, clonidine (1.59 ± 1.06 days) compared with guanfacine (3.18 ± 1.74 days) had a statistically significant faster time to reduction in nightmares (<i>p</i> = .005).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Both pharmacologic classes of medications were effective treatment options for pediatric PTSD-associated nightmares with a low incidence of adverse effects. There was a quick time to onset seen with all agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":101313,"journal":{"name":"The mental health clinician","volume":"14 3","pages":"199-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11147653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The mental health clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2024.06.199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children and adolescents has a high prevalence of accompanying sleep disturbances. Currently, pediatric treatment of PTSD-related nightmares is extrapolated from adult studies. This study aims to determine the effectiveness and safety of clonidine and guanfacine compared with prazosin for the treatment of PTSD-related nightmares.

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, medical record review of patients 5 to 17 years old admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit from January 2015 to September 2021. Patients with a new initiation of an alpha-2 agonist (clonidine or guanfacine) or an alpha-1 antagonist (prazosin) with a diagnosis of PTSD, other trauma- or stressor-related disorder or unspecified anxiety disorder were included. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with a decrease in the frequency of nightmares.

Results: A total of 59 patients were included in the study: 37 in the alpha-2 agonist group and 22 in the alpha-1 antagonist group. There was no statistically significant difference in reduction of nightmares with both groups having a high percentage of patients showing response (alpha-2 agonist: 91.9%, alpha-1 antagonist: 86.4%). Time to decrease in nightmares was comparable between groups with a relatively quick onset. Within the alpha-2 agonist group, clonidine (1.59 ± 1.06 days) compared with guanfacine (3.18 ± 1.74 days) had a statistically significant faster time to reduction in nightmares (p = .005).

Discussion: Both pharmacologic classes of medications were effective treatment options for pediatric PTSD-associated nightmares with a low incidence of adverse effects. There was a quick time to onset seen with all agents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较α-2受体激动剂和α-1拮抗剂对创伤后应激障碍相关恶梦儿科患者的治疗效果。
导言:儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)伴随睡眠障碍的发病率很高。目前,儿科治疗创伤后应激障碍相关噩梦的方法是从成人研究中推断出来的。本研究旨在确定氯尼地定和胍法辛与哌唑嗪治疗创伤后应激障碍相关噩梦的有效性和安全性:这是一项回顾性、单中心病历审查,审查对象为 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 9 月期间入住精神科住院病房的 5 至 17 岁患者。研究纳入了新开始使用α-2激动剂(氯尼丁或胍法辛)或α-1拮抗剂(哌唑嗪)并被诊断为创伤后应激障碍、其他创伤或应激相关障碍或不明焦虑障碍的患者。主要终点是噩梦频率下降的患者比例:研究共纳入了 59 名患者:结果:共有 59 名患者参加了研究:α-2 促效剂组 37 人,α-1 拮抗剂组 22 人。在减少噩梦方面,两组患者均有较高比例的反应(α-2 受体激动剂组:91.9%;α-1 拮抗剂组:86.4%),差异无统计学意义。两组患者噩梦减少的时间相当,起效相对较快。在α-2受体激动剂组中,氯尼丁(1.59 ± 1.06 天)与胍法辛(3.18 ± 1.74 天)相比,恶梦减少的时间明显更快(p = .005):讨论:这两类药物都是治疗小儿创伤后应激障碍相关恶梦的有效药物,不良反应发生率较低。所有药物的起效时间都很快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacist administration of long-acting injectable medications for substance use disorders: A scoping review. Impact of weight loss surgery on valproic acid levels: A case report. Potential changes impacting psychiatric pharmacy by 2030. A model for timely dissemination of critical information: Clozapine toxicity during the COVID pandemic. Transitions of care: Assessment of adherence to long-acting injectable antipsychotic treatment following discharge from inpatient psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1