The mental health clinician最新文献

Two Supreme Court cases in the United States describe the use of involuntary medication in individuals with mental illnesses. In addition to these legal requirements, clinicians must also incorporate ethics into treating these individuals, including the principles of autonomy and beneficence. Current guidelines do not provide specific recommendations for choosing an antipsychotic for a patient with schizophrenia who is being treated involuntarily. However, it is recommended that clinicians use general guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia as a basis for narrowing down appropriate therapy, which may involve the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics. Clinical considerations that should be accounted for include past medication trials, potential adverse effects, whether tolerability has been demonstrated, route of administration, dosing interval, requirement for oral overlap, comorbid conditions, patient preference, and access to the medication.

The effective use of duloxetine can be complicated by acute kidney injury, acute and/or chronic hepatic dysfunction, dysphagia, enteral nutrition, and common pharmacokinetic interactions. This article aimed to review the pharmacological properties of duloxetine pertinent to its use and to discuss the management of duloxetine in patients with common acute and chronic medical comorbidities. Management strategies based on clinical data and expert opinion are reviewed in 3 patient cases.

Vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitors (VMAT2i) are currently Food and Drug Administration-approved for the treatment of Huntington disease chorea and tardive dyskinesia. Additionally, they are often used for other hyperkinetic movement disorders in clinical practice. Due to a lack of head-to-head clinical trials, management of VMAT2i in the clinical setting may be unclear and rely on the clinical experience of the practitioner. Due to the limited distribution model, which typically requires VMAT2i to be dispensed by specialty pharmacies, access and initiation of treatment may present as barriers. Patient cases allow for the exploration of switching between VMAT2i, alternative routes of administration, utilization in pediatric and off-label conditions, and how to successfully initiate and monitor a patient on VMAT2i therapy.

Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) package labeling has a warning for neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAE), most commonly in children and adolescents, especially males. There are several case reports of NPAE in adults treated with oseltamivir, but few document patients with preexisting neuropsychiatric conditions without additional contributing factors. This case report describes a 22-year-old male with a history of bipolar disorder, depression, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder who had been stable on his medication regimen before experiencing sudden worsening of symptoms after the initiation of oseltamivir. The case adds to previous literature by strengthening the correlation between oseltamivir and a sudden increase in neuropsychiatric symptoms. Providers should be aware that oseltamivir may exacerbate symptoms of previously stable patients. Depending on the severity of neuropsychiatric effects, discontinuation of oseltamivir and symptom treatment with pharmacotherapy may be warranted.

Introduction: Single-dose injectable aripiprazole lauroxil (SDIAL) is used with long-acting injectable (LAI) aripiprazole lauroxil in the treatment of schizophrenia. SDIAL can be used to either initiate treatment or supplement during maintenance when follow-up doses are not given within labeling recommendations. The primary objective was to determine the usage and appropriateness of SDIAL between the initiation and the maintenance supplementation use in a Medicaid database. The secondary objective was to determine the overall associated costs with the potentially inappropriate use of LAI aripiprazole lauroxil.

Methods: International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition codes were used to identify adult patients with schizophrenia and related disorders (18-64 years) who received SDIAL and/or LAI aripiprazole lauroxil between 2018 and 2020 using MarketScan Medicaid databases. The appropriateness of SDIAL was determined by package insert labeling timelines for treatment initiation and maintenance supplementation. Two authors independently reviewed each SDIAL claim for appropriateness. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.

Results: After excluding possible billing errors, a total of 582 claims were identified for SDIAL. Of these, 21% were potentially inappropriate, with a higher proportion occurring during the maintenance phase. Overall, potential inappropriate use resulted in costs over $307 000.

Discussion: It appears that prescribers should be better educated on the appropriate use of SDIAL during maintenance supplementation.

Managing suicidality in persons with chronic pain is a challenging clinical scenario with no treatment guidelines to inform clinical decision-making related to suicide risk mitigation. Applying appropriate risk mitigation strategies, such as opioid education and naloxone distribution, lethal means safety education, increased frequency of appointments, individualized opioid tapers, consideration of nonopioid pharmacotherapy, nonpharmacological treatment options, and addressing modifiable risk factors, can decrease suicide risk. Recommending a treatment plan for patients with chronic pain experiencing suicidality is explored through 3 patient cases.

Risperidone is a second-generation antipsychotic with common adverse effects, such as extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain, hyperprolactinemia, and sedation. Angioedema, although generally considered to be uncommon, has previously been documented to occur following administration of some antipsychotics, including risperidone. This report describes a case of risperidone-induced angioedema in an older male patient.

Introduction: One in 5 adults in the United States have depression and are at risk for suicide, the 11th leading cause of death in the United States. Community pharmacy settings are ideal for increasing access to mental health services. Our objectives were to assess PHQ-9 scores and evaluate participant satisfaction in a student pharmacist-led depression screening program in a community pharmacy.

Methods: Student pharmacists trained in mental health first aid recruited participants 18 to 90 years old in a community pharmacy to complete the PHQ-9 and provided mental health education, referrals, and resources. A 2-week follow-up was completed, and participants reported on actions taken since the initial visit. Descriptive statistics, independent t tests, and χ ² tests were used in data analysis.

Results: Twelve depression screening events were held, and 70 participants completed the screenings. The mean age was 52 years, and 75.7% were female. PHQ-9 scores ranged from 0 to 24 with an average of 3.96. Most participants (92.9%) reported the depression screening program was helpful. More than 90% of participants completed the 2-week follow-up, and 92.3% reported being comfortable seeking mental health services from a pharmacist. About half (53.8%) reported reading the educational materials, 24.6% helped a friend or family member, and 16.9% made an appointment with their health care provider.

Discussion: Student pharmacists successfully provided depression screenings and mental health education in a community pharmacy. Most participants had low PHQ-9 scores, found the program helpful, and are willing to utilize mental health services in a community pharmacy.

Introduction: Bupropion is an antidepressant approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), seasonal affective disorder, and smoking cessation. Nausea, headache, tremor, and insomnia are well-known adverse effects of this medication. Less well-recognized adverse effects include delayed allergic reactions, which, in some cases, can appear 2 or more weeks after bupropion initiation.

Case report: A 27-year-old male with recurrent MDD was referred for medication treatment at an outpatient mental health clinic and prescribed bupropion XL. On day 28 of treatment, he reported significant improvement in depressive symptoms and the development of itchiness and urticaria on his extremities and back. Bupropion was tapered over the course of 7 days, and he was given cetirizine 10 mg daily. He was transitioned to venlafaxine treatment and experienced complete resolution of hives and pruritus.

Discussion: Despite published reports on bupropion causing delayed hypersensitivity reactions, there remains limited clinical recognition of this side effect, and the risk of underrecognition may be greater when the onset of the reaction is more than 2 weeks after bupropion initiation.

Conclusion: Bupropion can cause delayed hypersensitivity reactions, including delayed pruritis and urticaria. The risk may be highest in males aged 17 to 40 years and those with a history of allergic reactions.