{"title":"Evaluating prognostic biomarkers for survival outcomes subject to informative censoring.","authors":"Wei Liu, Danping Liu, Zhiwei Zhang","doi":"10.1177/09622802241259170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prognostic biomarkers for survival outcomes are widely used in clinical research and practice. Such biomarkers are often evaluated using a C-index as well as quantities based on time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves. Existing methods for their evaluation generally assume that censoring is uninformative in the sense that the censoring time is independent of the failure time with or without conditioning on the biomarker under evaluation. With focus on the C-index and the area under a particular receiver operating characteristic curve, we describe and compare three estimation methods that account for informative censoring based on observed baseline covariates. Two of them are straightforward extensions of existing plug-in and inverse probability weighting methods for uninformative censoring. By appealing to semiparametric theory, we also develop a doubly robust, locally efficient method that is more robust than the plug-in and inverse probability weighting methods and typically more efficient than the inverse probability weighting method. The methods are evaluated and compared in a simulation study, and applied to real data from studies of breast cancer and heart failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":22038,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1342-1354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802241259170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prognostic biomarkers for survival outcomes are widely used in clinical research and practice. Such biomarkers are often evaluated using a C-index as well as quantities based on time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves. Existing methods for their evaluation generally assume that censoring is uninformative in the sense that the censoring time is independent of the failure time with or without conditioning on the biomarker under evaluation. With focus on the C-index and the area under a particular receiver operating characteristic curve, we describe and compare three estimation methods that account for informative censoring based on observed baseline covariates. Two of them are straightforward extensions of existing plug-in and inverse probability weighting methods for uninformative censoring. By appealing to semiparametric theory, we also develop a doubly robust, locally efficient method that is more robust than the plug-in and inverse probability weighting methods and typically more efficient than the inverse probability weighting method. The methods are evaluated and compared in a simulation study, and applied to real data from studies of breast cancer and heart failure.
预示生存结果的生物标志物被广泛应用于临床研究和实践中。此类生物标志物通常使用 C 指数以及基于时间依赖性接收者工作特征曲线的数量进行评估。现有的评估方法通常假定普查是无信息的,即普查时间与评估生物标志物的失败时间无关。以 C 指数和特定接收者工作特征曲线下的面积为重点,我们描述并比较了三种基于观测到的基线协变量考虑信息性剔除的估算方法。其中两种方法是对现有插件和反概率加权方法的直接扩展,用于非信息性删减。通过利用半参数理论,我们还开发了一种双重稳健、局部有效的方法,它比插入式和反概率加权法更稳健,通常比反概率加权法更有效。我们在模拟研究中对这些方法进行了评估和比较,并将其应用于乳腺癌和心力衰竭研究的真实数据中。
期刊介绍:
Statistical Methods in Medical Research is a peer reviewed scholarly journal and is the leading vehicle for articles in all the main areas of medical statistics and an essential reference for all medical statisticians. This unique journal is devoted solely to statistics and medicine and aims to keep professionals abreast of the many powerful statistical techniques now available to the medical profession. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)