Allostatic Load and Metabolic Syndrome in Depressed Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Depression and Anxiety Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1155/2024/1355340
Francis Osei, Pia-Maria Wippert, Andrea Block
{"title":"Allostatic Load and Metabolic Syndrome in Depressed Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis","authors":"Francis Osei,&nbsp;Pia-Maria Wippert,&nbsp;Andrea Block","doi":"10.1155/2024/1355340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Allostatic load (AL) is the cumulative wear and tear on the body due to the chronic adverse physical or psychosocial situations. The acute stress response activates the primary mediators of AL, which include cortisol, epinephrine (EPI), norepinephrine (NE), and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S). Secondary outcomes, such as metabolic syndrome (MetS), cardiovascular, and immune system changes, can result from long-term stress responses. Given these complex reactions to an acute stressor, a multidimensional stress assessment is required when investigating individual stress reactivity in an experimental setting. This study is aimed at examining the association between the primary mediators of AL and MetS in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients. MDD patients (<i>n</i> = 164, age = 18–65 years old) with MetS+ (<i>n</i> = 46, weight = 93.10 ± 16.43 kg) and without MetS- (<i>n</i> = 118, weight = 73.08 ± 15.22 kg) were analyzed cross-sectionally. Stepwise binary regression and Welch’s <i>t</i>-test were used to find the associations and differences between the two groups. The regression analysis was fully adjusted for age, sex, and the Beck Depression Inventory-II score. In unadjusted model, cortisol (<i>b</i> = −0.003, <i>p</i> = 0.034) was inversely associated with MetS. In fully adjusted model, EPI (<i>b</i> = −0.006, <i>p</i> = 0.007) was inversely associated with MetS. However, significant differences (<i>p</i> = 0.005) were observed for cortisol between MDD patients without MetS- (410.13 ± 144.63 nmol/l) and MDD patients with MetS+ (340.90 ± 132.98 nmol/l) with a small effect size (Cohen’s <i>d</i> of 0.489). Significant differences (<i>p</i> = 0.001) were observed for EPI between MDD patients without MetS- (185.67 ± 124.44 pg/ml) and MDD patients with MetS+ (124.95 ± 84.38 pg/ml) with a moderate effect size (Cohen’s <i>d</i> of 0.530). These observations are of clinical importance for the management of MDD patients.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1355340","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1355340","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Allostatic load (AL) is the cumulative wear and tear on the body due to the chronic adverse physical or psychosocial situations. The acute stress response activates the primary mediators of AL, which include cortisol, epinephrine (EPI), norepinephrine (NE), and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S). Secondary outcomes, such as metabolic syndrome (MetS), cardiovascular, and immune system changes, can result from long-term stress responses. Given these complex reactions to an acute stressor, a multidimensional stress assessment is required when investigating individual stress reactivity in an experimental setting. This study is aimed at examining the association between the primary mediators of AL and MetS in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients. MDD patients (n = 164, age = 18–65 years old) with MetS+ (n = 46, weight = 93.10 ± 16.43 kg) and without MetS- (n = 118, weight = 73.08 ± 15.22 kg) were analyzed cross-sectionally. Stepwise binary regression and Welch’s t-test were used to find the associations and differences between the two groups. The regression analysis was fully adjusted for age, sex, and the Beck Depression Inventory-II score. In unadjusted model, cortisol (b = −0.003, p = 0.034) was inversely associated with MetS. In fully adjusted model, EPI (b = −0.006, p = 0.007) was inversely associated with MetS. However, significant differences (p = 0.005) were observed for cortisol between MDD patients without MetS- (410.13 ± 144.63 nmol/l) and MDD patients with MetS+ (340.90 ± 132.98 nmol/l) with a small effect size (Cohen’s d of 0.489). Significant differences (p = 0.001) were observed for EPI between MDD patients without MetS- (185.67 ± 124.44 pg/ml) and MDD patients with MetS+ (124.95 ± 84.38 pg/ml) with a moderate effect size (Cohen’s d of 0.530). These observations are of clinical importance for the management of MDD patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抑郁症患者的代谢负荷和代谢综合征:横断面分析
静态负荷(Allostatic load,AL)是指长期不良的生理或社会心理状况对身体造成的累积性磨损。急性应激反应会激活 AL 的主要介质,包括皮质醇、肾上腺素(EPI)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)和硫酸脱氢表雄酮(DHEA-S)。长期应激反应可导致代谢综合征(MetS)、心血管和免疫系统变化等次要结果。鉴于对急性应激源的这些复杂反应,在实验环境中调查个体应激反应时需要进行多维度的应激评估。本研究旨在探讨重度抑郁症(MDD)患者体内 AL 的主要介质与 MetS 之间的关联。研究人员对患有 MetS+(46 人,体重为 93.10 ± 16.43 千克)和未患有 MetS-(118 人,体重为 73.08 ± 15.22 千克)的 MDD 患者(164 人,年龄为 18-65 岁)进行了横截面分析。采用逐步二元回归和韦尔奇 t 检验来发现两组之间的关联和差异。回归分析对年龄、性别和贝克抑郁量表-II 评分进行了充分调整。在未经调整的模型中,皮质醇(b = -0.003,p = 0.034)与 MetS 呈反向关系。在完全调整模型中,EPI(b = -0.006,p = 0.007)与 MetS 成反比。然而,在皮质醇方面,未患 MetS- 的 MDD 患者(410.13 ± 144.63 nmol/l)和患 MetS+ 的 MDD 患者(340.90 ± 132.98 nmol/l)之间存在明显差异(p = 0.005),但影响较小(Cohen's d 为 0.489)。未患 MetS- 的 MDD 患者(185.67 ± 124.44 pg/ml)和患 MetS+ 的 MDD 患者(124.95 ± 84.38 pg/ml)之间的 EPI 存在显著差异(p = 0.001),效应大小适中(Cohen's d 为 0.530)。这些观察结果对 MDD 患者的管理具有重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
期刊最新文献
A Longitudinal Correlational Study of Psychological Resilience, Depression Disorder, and Brain Functional–Structural Hybrid Connectome in Breast Cancer Associations of Changes in Alcohol Consumption on the Risk of Depression/Suicide Among Initial Nondrinkers Effectiveness of a Saffron and Withania Supplement on Mood in Women With Mild-to-Moderate Anxiety During the COVID-19 Lockdown Correlation Between Anxiety and Serum Thyroid Hormone Levels in Patients With Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Undergoing Microwave Ablation The Bridge Symptoms of Work–Family Conflict, Sleep Disorder, and Job Burnout: A Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1