Drift-Diffusion Modeling of Attentional Shifting During Frustration: Associations With State Frustration and Trait Irritability

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Depression and Anxiety Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1155/da/1618163
Nellia Bellaert, Peter J. Castagna, Christen M. Deveney, Michael J. Crowley, Wan-Ling Tseng
{"title":"Drift-Diffusion Modeling of Attentional Shifting During Frustration: Associations With State Frustration and Trait Irritability","authors":"Nellia Bellaert,&nbsp;Peter J. Castagna,&nbsp;Christen M. Deveney,&nbsp;Michael J. Crowley,&nbsp;Wan-Ling Tseng","doi":"10.1155/da/1618163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Irritability, a prevalent and impairing symptom in many mood and anxiety disorders, is characterized by aberrant responses to frustrative nonreward. Past research investigating irritability have used a cued-attention task with rigged feedback, the affective Posner task (AP), to induce frustrative nonreward. Previous studies have not been successful in linking differences in self-reported irritability to traditional AP metrics (i.e., reaction time and accuracy). Computational modeling, via the estimation of parameters reflecting latent cognitive processes, may provide insight into the cognitive mechanisms of irritability and reveal potential targets for mechanism-based interventions. This study applied the drift-diffusion model (DDM) to the AP to determine if DDM parameters are associated with individual differences in irritability. Young adults (<i>N</i> = 152, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 20.93 ± 1.98) completed the AP and self-reported state frustration and trait irritability. Multiple linear regressions were used to evaluate whether DDM parameters better predict state frustration and trait irritability over traditional AP metrics. Higher state frustration was predicted by lower decision threshold during the frustration block and larger decrease in this parameter between nonfrustration and frustration blocks, over traditional AP metrics. These findings demonstrate the potential of applying the DDM to study frustrative nonreward in healthy adult populations. The utility of DDM awaits validation in populations with clinical levels of irritability.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/1618163","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/1618163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irritability, a prevalent and impairing symptom in many mood and anxiety disorders, is characterized by aberrant responses to frustrative nonreward. Past research investigating irritability have used a cued-attention task with rigged feedback, the affective Posner task (AP), to induce frustrative nonreward. Previous studies have not been successful in linking differences in self-reported irritability to traditional AP metrics (i.e., reaction time and accuracy). Computational modeling, via the estimation of parameters reflecting latent cognitive processes, may provide insight into the cognitive mechanisms of irritability and reveal potential targets for mechanism-based interventions. This study applied the drift-diffusion model (DDM) to the AP to determine if DDM parameters are associated with individual differences in irritability. Young adults (N = 152, Mage = 20.93 ± 1.98) completed the AP and self-reported state frustration and trait irritability. Multiple linear regressions were used to evaluate whether DDM parameters better predict state frustration and trait irritability over traditional AP metrics. Higher state frustration was predicted by lower decision threshold during the frustration block and larger decrease in this parameter between nonfrustration and frustration blocks, over traditional AP metrics. These findings demonstrate the potential of applying the DDM to study frustrative nonreward in healthy adult populations. The utility of DDM awaits validation in populations with clinical levels of irritability.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
期刊最新文献
Drift-Diffusion Modeling of Attentional Shifting During Frustration: Associations With State Frustration and Trait Irritability Intra- and Extracellular White Matter Micromorphology Predict the Antidepressant Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Identification of Subthreshold Depression Based on fNIRS–VFT Functional Connectivity: A Machine Learning Approach Global Scientific Trends on Anxiety Disorders in the Early Twenty-First Century: A Data-Driven Bibliometric Analysis Artificial Intelligence–Based Psychotherapeutic Intervention on Psychological Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1