Improving the understanding of mobility in cross-border areas using a pooled travel survey

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1007/s11116-024-10488-3
Justin Delloye, Sylvain Klein, Olivier Klein, Guillaume Drevon, Mathieu Jacquot, Viviane Rapp, Eric Cornelis, Joanna Rousseaux, Julien Schiebel, Guy Besch, Stéphane Godefroy, Philippe Gerber
{"title":"Improving the understanding of mobility in cross-border areas using a pooled travel survey","authors":"Justin Delloye, Sylvain Klein, Olivier Klein, Guillaume Drevon, Mathieu Jacquot, Viviane Rapp, Eric Cornelis, Joanna Rousseaux, Julien Schiebel, Guy Besch, Stéphane Godefroy, Philippe Gerber","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10488-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding mobility behaviour in cross-border regions is a major challenge for transport policies and the wellbeing of people living near national borders. However, the available relevant information is often limited to a collection of unharmonized national sources. To overcome this limitation, we propose a methodology for building a pooled travel survey, by merging microdata from travel surveys conducted independently in different cross-border areas of the same cross-border region. Anchored in the Luxembourg functional cross-border region as a study area, this paper provides a general, ready-to-use harmonization methodology for pooling travel surveys. It critically discusses the resulting harmonized values of standard daily mobility indicators in regard to the specificities of the study area. Lastly, it shows that the values for the proportions of trip purposes computed with the pooled survey exhibit substantial differences from values obtained using only local travel surveys (up to 6 percentage points, and up to 33 per cent in the total number of trips). This illustrates the added value of a pooled travel survey compared with an unharmonized collection of local surveys.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10488-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding mobility behaviour in cross-border regions is a major challenge for transport policies and the wellbeing of people living near national borders. However, the available relevant information is often limited to a collection of unharmonized national sources. To overcome this limitation, we propose a methodology for building a pooled travel survey, by merging microdata from travel surveys conducted independently in different cross-border areas of the same cross-border region. Anchored in the Luxembourg functional cross-border region as a study area, this paper provides a general, ready-to-use harmonization methodology for pooling travel surveys. It critically discusses the resulting harmonized values of standard daily mobility indicators in regard to the specificities of the study area. Lastly, it shows that the values for the proportions of trip purposes computed with the pooled survey exhibit substantial differences from values obtained using only local travel surveys (up to 6 percentage points, and up to 33 per cent in the total number of trips). This illustrates the added value of a pooled travel survey compared with an unharmonized collection of local surveys.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用联合旅行调查增进对跨境地区流动性的了解
了解跨境地区的流动行为对交通政策和生活在国界附近的人们的福祉来说是一项重大挑战。然而,现有的相关信息往往仅限于收集未经协调的国家信息来源。为了克服这一局限性,我们提出了一种方法,通过合并在同一跨境地区不同跨境区域独立开展的旅行调查微观数据,建立集合旅行调查。本文以卢森堡功能性跨境区域为研究对象,为汇集旅行调查提供了一种通用的、随时可用的协调方法。本文针对研究区域的特殊性,批判性地讨论了标准日常交通指标的统一值。最后,本文还表明,通过集合调查计算出的出行目的比例值与仅使用当地出行调查得出的值存在很大差异(最多相差 6 个百分点,出行总数最多相差 33%)。这说明,与未经协调的地方调查相比,集合旅行调查具有附加值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
期刊最新文献
Identification and investigation of cruising speeds from cycling GPS data Beyond metros: pollution mitigation and environmental benefits in diverse transit systems Pffm-se: a passenger flow forecasting model for urban rail transit based on multimodal fusion of AFC and social media sentiment under special events Calibration of vehicular traffic simulation models by local optimization Agent-based modelling of older adult needs for autonomous mobility-on-demand: a case study in Winnipeg, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1