{"title":"Identification and investigation of cruising speeds from cycling GPS data","authors":"Elmira Berjisian, Alexander Bigazzi","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10595-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Utilitarian cycling speed is a crucial input for applications such as infrastructure design, mode and route choice models, traffic microsimulation, safety evaluations, and health impact assessments. However, current methods fail to distinguish between average speed and cruising speed, the latter of which is more behaviourally indicative. This study aims to identify cruising speed from GPS data and investigate how it varies with contextual and personal factors. We evaluate six algorithms to extract cruising events from cycling GPS travel data: three time series clustering methods to identify steady-state events, in combination with two labeling methods to identify which events represent cruising. The best-performing algorithm uses Toeplitz Inverse Covariance-Based Clustering and identifies cruising events based on a decision tree heuristic. The average cruising speed of 21.53 km/hr is significantly higher than the overall average speed of 19.95 km/hr. Cruising speeds are higher for commute trips, longer trips, e-cyclists, ‘Dedicated’ cyclists, and men. Regarding route factors, cruising speeds are higher in locations with lower grade, more greenery, on-street cycling facilities, high motor vehicle volume, no traffic controls, and lower relative crash risk. Distinguishing cruising events within cycling trajectory data is necessary to avoid underestimating the behavioural sensitivity of cyclists to factors such as road grade, facility type, relative crash risk, trip purpose, gender, and bicycle motorization.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10595-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Utilitarian cycling speed is a crucial input for applications such as infrastructure design, mode and route choice models, traffic microsimulation, safety evaluations, and health impact assessments. However, current methods fail to distinguish between average speed and cruising speed, the latter of which is more behaviourally indicative. This study aims to identify cruising speed from GPS data and investigate how it varies with contextual and personal factors. We evaluate six algorithms to extract cruising events from cycling GPS travel data: three time series clustering methods to identify steady-state events, in combination with two labeling methods to identify which events represent cruising. The best-performing algorithm uses Toeplitz Inverse Covariance-Based Clustering and identifies cruising events based on a decision tree heuristic. The average cruising speed of 21.53 km/hr is significantly higher than the overall average speed of 19.95 km/hr. Cruising speeds are higher for commute trips, longer trips, e-cyclists, ‘Dedicated’ cyclists, and men. Regarding route factors, cruising speeds are higher in locations with lower grade, more greenery, on-street cycling facilities, high motor vehicle volume, no traffic controls, and lower relative crash risk. Distinguishing cruising events within cycling trajectory data is necessary to avoid underestimating the behavioural sensitivity of cyclists to factors such as road grade, facility type, relative crash risk, trip purpose, gender, and bicycle motorization.
期刊介绍:
In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world.
These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.