Comparative study on air-cooled fuel cell stacks with metal and graphite bipolar plate designs for unmanned aerial vehicles

IF 15 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Etransportation Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.etran.2024.100344
Cong Yin , Shiyang Hua , Wei Nie , Haiyu Yang , Hao Tang
{"title":"Comparative study on air-cooled fuel cell stacks with metal and graphite bipolar plate designs for unmanned aerial vehicles","authors":"Cong Yin ,&nbsp;Shiyang Hua ,&nbsp;Wei Nie ,&nbsp;Haiyu Yang ,&nbsp;Hao Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.etran.2024.100344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) power source is a promising solution for the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to extend the flight endurance. However, the light weighted PEMFC stack design with improved performance remains a critical challenge for the UAVs applications. In this study, two air-cooled PEMFC stacks based on metal and graphite bipolar plates are designed respectively to optimize the fuel cell power density with comparative tests and simulations under varied operating conditions. The designed metal and graphite stacks could reach the power densities of 1189 W/kg and 792 W/kg, of which the graphite one is integrated in a hybrid power system for the UAVs and operated for a flight test with ∼45 min. Validated by the experiment, a three-dimensional coupled model is developed to comparatively study the internal performance and thermal behaviors of the two stacks. Compared with the graphite stack, the metal one outputs higher voltage by 4 %, weighs lighter by 31 % and improves air forced thermal dissipation with enhanced water retention ability. The proposed model and comparative analysis reveal the mechanisms of stack performance variation under different designs and operations, which are beneficial for the optimization of UAVs fuel cell power system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36355,"journal":{"name":"Etransportation","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100344"},"PeriodicalIF":15.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etransportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590116824000341","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) power source is a promising solution for the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to extend the flight endurance. However, the light weighted PEMFC stack design with improved performance remains a critical challenge for the UAVs applications. In this study, two air-cooled PEMFC stacks based on metal and graphite bipolar plates are designed respectively to optimize the fuel cell power density with comparative tests and simulations under varied operating conditions. The designed metal and graphite stacks could reach the power densities of 1189 W/kg and 792 W/kg, of which the graphite one is integrated in a hybrid power system for the UAVs and operated for a flight test with ∼45 min. Validated by the experiment, a three-dimensional coupled model is developed to comparatively study the internal performance and thermal behaviors of the two stacks. Compared with the graphite stack, the metal one outputs higher voltage by 4 %, weighs lighter by 31 % and improves air forced thermal dissipation with enhanced water retention ability. The proposed model and comparative analysis reveal the mechanisms of stack performance variation under different designs and operations, which are beneficial for the optimization of UAVs fuel cell power system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用金属和石墨双极板设计的无人驾驶飞行器空气冷却燃料电池堆比较研究
质子交换膜燃料电池(PEMFC)电源是无人驾驶飞行器(UAV)延长飞行续航时间的一种有前途的解决方案。然而,如何设计出重量轻、性能更好的质子交换膜燃料电池堆仍然是无人飞行器应用领域面临的一项重大挑战。本研究分别设计了基于金属和石墨双极板的两种空气冷却 PEMFC 电堆,通过在不同工作条件下进行比较试验和模拟,优化燃料电池的功率密度。所设计的金属和石墨电池堆的功率密度分别达到 1189 W/kg 和 792 W/kg,其中石墨电池堆被集成到无人机的混合动力系统中,并进行了∼45 分钟的飞行测试。通过实验验证,建立了一个三维耦合模型,以比较研究两种堆栈的内部性能和热行为。与石墨叠层相比,金属叠层的电压输出提高了 4%,重量减轻了 31%,并且改善了空气强制散热,提高了保水能力。所提出的模型和对比分析揭示了不同设计和操作下电堆性能变化的机理,有利于无人机燃料电池动力系统的优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Etransportation
Etransportation Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
12.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: eTransportation is a scholarly journal that aims to advance knowledge in the field of electric transportation. It focuses on all modes of transportation that utilize electricity as their primary source of energy, including electric vehicles, trains, ships, and aircraft. The journal covers all stages of research, development, and testing of new technologies, systems, and devices related to electrical transportation. The journal welcomes the use of simulation and analysis tools at the system, transport, or device level. Its primary emphasis is on the study of the electrical and electronic aspects of transportation systems. However, it also considers research on mechanical parts or subsystems of vehicles if there is a clear interaction with electrical or electronic equipment. Please note that this journal excludes other aspects such as sociological, political, regulatory, or environmental factors from its scope.
期刊最新文献
Simulation of single-layer internal short circuit in anode-free batteries Comprehensive energy footprint of electrified fleets: School bus fleet case study An advanced spatial decision model for strategic placement of off-site hydrogen refueling stations in urban areas Explosion characteristics of two-phase ejecta from large-capacity lithium iron phosphate batteries Deep learning driven battery voltage-capacity curve prediction utilizing short-term relaxation voltage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1