[Predictive value of a risk prediction model guided by the ratio of respiratory rate to diaphragmatic thickening fraction for the timing of noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].

Xiaodong Li, Tian Li, Xingwei Di, Jingyu Liu
{"title":"[Predictive value of a risk prediction model guided by the ratio of respiratory rate to diaphragmatic thickening fraction for the timing of noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].","authors":"Xiaodong Li, Tian Li, Xingwei Di, Jingyu Liu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20231205-01051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the predictive value of a risk prediction model guided by the ratio of respiratory rate to diaphragm thickening fraction (RR/DTF) for noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition timing in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), through ultrasound evaluation of diaphragm movement indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-four patients diagnosed with AECOPD and undergoing non-invasive ventilation (NIV), who were admitted to the department of critical care medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University from January 2022 to July 2023 were enrolled. They were divided into NIV successful group and NIV failure group based on the outcome of NIV within 24 hours. Clinical indicators such as RR/DTF, diaphragmatic excursion (DE), tidal volume (VT), respiratory rate (RR), pH value, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO<sub>2</sub>), and sputum excretion disorder were compared between the two groups after 2 hours of NIV. The factors influencing NIV failure were included in binary Logistic regression analysis, and an RR/DTF oriented risk prediction model was established. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) analysis was used to assess the predictive value of this model for the timing of noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition in AECOPD patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 64 patients with AECOPD, with 43 in the NIV successful group and 21 in the NIV failure group. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), oxygenation index (P/F), smoking history, and acute physiological and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) between the two groups of patients, indicating comparability. Compared to the NIV successful group, the NIV failure group showed a significantly increase in RR/DTF, RR, PaCO<sub>2</sub>, and sputum retention, while VT and DE were significantly decreased [RR/DTF (%): 1.00±0.18 vs. 0.89±0.22, RR (bpm): 21.64±3.13 vs. 19.62±2.98, PaCO<sub>2</sub> (mmHg, 1 mmHg ≈ 0.133 kPa): 70.82±8.82 vs. 65.29±9.47, sputum retention: 57.1% vs. 30.2%, VT (mL): 308.09±14.89 vs. 324.48±23.82, DE (mm): 19.91±2.94 vs. 22.05±3.30, all P < 0.05]. Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that RR/DTF [odds ratio (OR) = 147.989, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 3.321-595.412, P = 0.010], RR (OR = 1.296, 95%CI was 1.006-1.670, P = 0.045), VT (OR = 0.966, 95%CI was 0.935-0.999, P = 0.044), PaCO<sub>2</sub> (OR = 1.086, 95%CI was 1.006~1.173, P = 0.035), and sputum retention (OR = 4.533, 95%CI was 1.025-20.049, P = 0.046) were independent risk factors for predicting NIV failure in AECOPD patients. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.713 with a 95%CI of 0.587-0.839 (P = 0.005). The sensitivity was 72.73%, the specificity was 88.10%, the Youden index was 0.394, and the optimal cut-off value was 0.87.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RR/DTF risk prediction model has good predictive value for the timing of noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition in AECOPD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":24079,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20231205-01051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of a risk prediction model guided by the ratio of respiratory rate to diaphragm thickening fraction (RR/DTF) for noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition timing in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), through ultrasound evaluation of diaphragm movement indicators.

Methods: Sixty-four patients diagnosed with AECOPD and undergoing non-invasive ventilation (NIV), who were admitted to the department of critical care medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University from January 2022 to July 2023 were enrolled. They were divided into NIV successful group and NIV failure group based on the outcome of NIV within 24 hours. Clinical indicators such as RR/DTF, diaphragmatic excursion (DE), tidal volume (VT), respiratory rate (RR), pH value, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), and sputum excretion disorder were compared between the two groups after 2 hours of NIV. The factors influencing NIV failure were included in binary Logistic regression analysis, and an RR/DTF oriented risk prediction model was established. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) analysis was used to assess the predictive value of this model for the timing of noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition in AECOPD patients.

Results: Among 64 patients with AECOPD, with 43 in the NIV successful group and 21 in the NIV failure group. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), oxygenation index (P/F), smoking history, and acute physiological and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) between the two groups of patients, indicating comparability. Compared to the NIV successful group, the NIV failure group showed a significantly increase in RR/DTF, RR, PaCO2, and sputum retention, while VT and DE were significantly decreased [RR/DTF (%): 1.00±0.18 vs. 0.89±0.22, RR (bpm): 21.64±3.13 vs. 19.62±2.98, PaCO2 (mmHg, 1 mmHg ≈ 0.133 kPa): 70.82±8.82 vs. 65.29±9.47, sputum retention: 57.1% vs. 30.2%, VT (mL): 308.09±14.89 vs. 324.48±23.82, DE (mm): 19.91±2.94 vs. 22.05±3.30, all P < 0.05]. Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that RR/DTF [odds ratio (OR) = 147.989, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 3.321-595.412, P = 0.010], RR (OR = 1.296, 95%CI was 1.006-1.670, P = 0.045), VT (OR = 0.966, 95%CI was 0.935-0.999, P = 0.044), PaCO2 (OR = 1.086, 95%CI was 1.006~1.173, P = 0.035), and sputum retention (OR = 4.533, 95%CI was 1.025-20.049, P = 0.046) were independent risk factors for predicting NIV failure in AECOPD patients. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.713 with a 95%CI of 0.587-0.839 (P = 0.005). The sensitivity was 72.73%, the specificity was 88.10%, the Youden index was 0.394, and the optimal cut-off value was 0.87.

Conclusions: The RR/DTF risk prediction model has good predictive value for the timing of noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition in AECOPD patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[以呼吸频率与膈肌增厚率之比为指导的风险预测模型对慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重患者无创-有创机械通气转换时机的预测价值]。
目的通过超声评估膈肌运动指标,评估以呼吸频率与膈肌增厚分数比值(RR/DTF)为指导的风险预测模型对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)患者无创-有创机械通气转换时机的预测价值:方法:选取锦州医科大学附属第一医院重症医学科2022年1月至2023年7月收治的64例确诊为AECOPD并接受无创通气(NIV)的患者为研究对象。根据 24 小时内 NIV 的结果分为 NIV 成功组和 NIV 失败组。比较两组患者 NIV 2 小时后的 RR/DTF、膈肌张力(DE)、潮气量(VT)、呼吸频率(RR)、pH 值、二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、排痰障碍等临床指标。将影响 NIV 失败的因素纳入二元 Logistic 回归分析,并建立了以 RR/DTF 为导向的风险预测模型。使用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析评估了该模型对AECOPD患者无创-有创机械通气转换时机的预测价值:64 名 AECOPD 患者中,无创通气成功组 43 人,无创通气失败组 21 人。两组患者在年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、氧合作用指数(P/F)、吸烟史、急性生理和慢性健康评估 II(APACHE II)等基线数据上无统计学差异,具有可比性。与 NIV 成功组相比,NIV 失败组的 RR/DTF、RR、PaCO2 和痰液潴留显著增加,而 VT 和 DE 显著减少[RR/DTF(%):1.00±0.18 vs. 0.89±0.22,RR(bpm):21.64±3.13 vs. 19.62±2.98,PaCO2(mmHg,1 mmHg ≈ 0.133 kPa):70.82±8.82 vs. 65.29±9.47,痰液滞留率:57.1% vs. 30.257.1% vs. 30.2%, VT (mL): 308.09±14.89 vs. 324.48±23.82, DE (mm):19.91±2.94 vs. 22.05±3.30,所有 P <0.05]。二元 Logistic 回归分析显示,RR/DTF [几率比(OR)= 147.989,95% 置信区间(95%CI)为 3.321-595.412,P = 0.010]、RR(OR = 1.296,95%CI 为 1.006-1.670,P = 0.045)、VT(OR = 0.966,95%CI 为 0.935-0.999, P = 0.044)、PaCO2(OR = 1.086, 95%CI 为 1.006~1.173, P = 0.035)和痰液滞留(OR = 4.533, 95%CI 为 1.025-20.049, P = 0.046)是预测 AECOPD 患者 NIV 失败的独立危险因素。ROC曲线分析显示,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.713,95%CI为0.587-0.839(P = 0.005)。灵敏度为 72.73%,特异度为 88.10%,Youden 指数为 0.394,最佳临界值为 0.87:RR/DTF风险预测模型对AECOPD患者无创-有创机械通气转换时机具有良好的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
[Annexin A1 activates the G protein-coupled formyl peptide receptor type 2-dependent endothelial nitric oxide synthase pathway to alleviate sepsis associated acute lung injury]. [Application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with renal replacement therapy in the treatment of war traumatic sepsis]. [Clinical characteristics and risk factors analysis of dengue fever incidence in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province in 2023]. [Design and application of an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-specific line fixation device]. [Early diagnostic and prognosis prediction of circ_0054633 for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome in children with severe pneumonia].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1