{"title":"Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods for bone flap repositioning after lateral orbitotomy approach: A finite element analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In ophthalmic surgery, different materials and fixation methods are employed for bone flap<span> repositioning after lateral orbitotomy approach (LOA), yet there is no unified standard. This study aims to investigate the impact of different fixation strategies on orbital stability through Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations of the biomechanical environment for orbital rim fixation in LOA.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A Finite Element Model (FEM) was established and validated to simulate the mechanical responses under various loads in conventional lateral orbitotomy approach (CLOA) and deep lateral orbital decompression (DLOD) using single titanium plate, double titanium plates, and double absorbable plates fixation methods. The simulations were then validated against clinical cases.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Under similar conditions, the maximum equivalent stress (MES) on titanium alloy fixations was greater than that on absorbable plate materials. Both under static and physiological conditions, all FEM groups ensured structural stability of the system, with material stresses remaining within safe ranges. Compared to CLOA, DLOD, which involves the removal of the lateral orbital wall, altered stress conduction, resulting in an increase of MES and maximum total deformation (MTD) by 1.96 and 2.62 times, respectively. Under a horizontal load of 50 N, the MES in FEM/DLOD exceeded the material's own strength, with an increase in MES and MTD by 3.18 and 6.64 times, respectively, compared to FEM/CLOA. Under a vertical force of 50 N, the MES sustained by each FEM was within safe limits. Bone flap rotation angles remained minimally varied across scenarios. During follow-up, the 12 patients validated in this study did not experience complications related to the internal fixation devices.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Under static or physiological conditions, various fixation methods can effectively maintain stability at the orbitotomy site, and absorbable materials, with their smoother stress transmission properties, are more suited for application in CLOA. Among titanium plate fixations, single titanium plates can better withstand vertical stress, while double titanium plates are more capable of handling horizontal stress. Given the change in the orbital mechanical behavior due to DLOD, enhanced fixation strength should be considered for bone flap repositioning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"125 5","pages":"Article 101938"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785524001848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
In ophthalmic surgery, different materials and fixation methods are employed for bone flap repositioning after lateral orbitotomy approach (LOA), yet there is no unified standard. This study aims to investigate the impact of different fixation strategies on orbital stability through Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations of the biomechanical environment for orbital rim fixation in LOA.
Methods
A Finite Element Model (FEM) was established and validated to simulate the mechanical responses under various loads in conventional lateral orbitotomy approach (CLOA) and deep lateral orbital decompression (DLOD) using single titanium plate, double titanium plates, and double absorbable plates fixation methods. The simulations were then validated against clinical cases.
Results
Under similar conditions, the maximum equivalent stress (MES) on titanium alloy fixations was greater than that on absorbable plate materials. Both under static and physiological conditions, all FEM groups ensured structural stability of the system, with material stresses remaining within safe ranges. Compared to CLOA, DLOD, which involves the removal of the lateral orbital wall, altered stress conduction, resulting in an increase of MES and maximum total deformation (MTD) by 1.96 and 2.62 times, respectively. Under a horizontal load of 50 N, the MES in FEM/DLOD exceeded the material's own strength, with an increase in MES and MTD by 3.18 and 6.64 times, respectively, compared to FEM/CLOA. Under a vertical force of 50 N, the MES sustained by each FEM was within safe limits. Bone flap rotation angles remained minimally varied across scenarios. During follow-up, the 12 patients validated in this study did not experience complications related to the internal fixation devices.
Conclusion
Under static or physiological conditions, various fixation methods can effectively maintain stability at the orbitotomy site, and absorbable materials, with their smoother stress transmission properties, are more suited for application in CLOA. Among titanium plate fixations, single titanium plates can better withstand vertical stress, while double titanium plates are more capable of handling horizontal stress. Given the change in the orbital mechanical behavior due to DLOD, enhanced fixation strength should be considered for bone flap repositioning.