Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods for bone flap repositioning after lateral orbitotomy approach: A finite element analysis

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101938
{"title":"Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods for bone flap repositioning after lateral orbitotomy approach: A finite element analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In ophthalmic surgery, different materials and fixation methods are employed for bone flap<span> repositioning after lateral orbitotomy approach (LOA), yet there is no unified standard. This study aims to investigate the impact of different fixation strategies on orbital stability through Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations of the biomechanical environment for orbital rim fixation in LOA.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A Finite Element Model (FEM) was established and validated to simulate the mechanical responses under various loads in conventional lateral orbitotomy approach (CLOA) and deep lateral orbital decompression (DLOD) using single titanium plate, double titanium plates, and double absorbable plates fixation methods. The simulations were then validated against clinical cases.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Under similar conditions, the maximum equivalent stress (MES) on titanium alloy fixations was greater than that on absorbable plate materials. Both under static and physiological conditions, all FEM groups ensured structural stability of the system, with material stresses remaining within safe ranges. Compared to CLOA, DLOD, which involves the removal of the lateral orbital wall, altered stress conduction, resulting in an increase of MES and maximum total deformation (MTD) by 1.96 and 2.62 times, respectively. Under a horizontal load of 50 N, the MES in FEM/DLOD exceeded the material's own strength, with an increase in MES and MTD by 3.18 and 6.64 times, respectively, compared to FEM/CLOA. Under a vertical force of 50 N, the MES sustained by each FEM was within safe limits. Bone flap rotation angles remained minimally varied across scenarios. During follow-up, the 12 patients validated in this study did not experience complications related to the internal fixation devices.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Under static or physiological conditions, various fixation methods can effectively maintain stability at the orbitotomy site, and absorbable materials, with their smoother stress transmission properties, are more suited for application in CLOA. Among titanium plate fixations, single titanium plates can better withstand vertical stress, while double titanium plates are more capable of handling horizontal stress. Given the change in the orbital mechanical behavior due to DLOD, enhanced fixation strength should be considered for bone flap repositioning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"125 5","pages":"Article 101938"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785524001848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

In ophthalmic surgery, different materials and fixation methods are employed for bone flap repositioning after lateral orbitotomy approach (LOA), yet there is no unified standard. This study aims to investigate the impact of different fixation strategies on orbital stability through Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations of the biomechanical environment for orbital rim fixation in LOA.

Methods

A Finite Element Model (FEM) was established and validated to simulate the mechanical responses under various loads in conventional lateral orbitotomy approach (CLOA) and deep lateral orbital decompression (DLOD) using single titanium plate, double titanium plates, and double absorbable plates fixation methods. The simulations were then validated against clinical cases.

Results

Under similar conditions, the maximum equivalent stress (MES) on titanium alloy fixations was greater than that on absorbable plate materials. Both under static and physiological conditions, all FEM groups ensured structural stability of the system, with material stresses remaining within safe ranges. Compared to CLOA, DLOD, which involves the removal of the lateral orbital wall, altered stress conduction, resulting in an increase of MES and maximum total deformation (MTD) by 1.96 and 2.62 times, respectively. Under a horizontal load of 50 N, the MES in FEM/DLOD exceeded the material's own strength, with an increase in MES and MTD by 3.18 and 6.64 times, respectively, compared to FEM/CLOA. Under a vertical force of 50 N, the MES sustained by each FEM was within safe limits. Bone flap rotation angles remained minimally varied across scenarios. During follow-up, the 12 patients validated in this study did not experience complications related to the internal fixation devices.

Conclusion

Under static or physiological conditions, various fixation methods can effectively maintain stability at the orbitotomy site, and absorbable materials, with their smoother stress transmission properties, are more suited for application in CLOA. Among titanium plate fixations, single titanium plates can better withstand vertical stress, while double titanium plates are more capable of handling horizontal stress. Given the change in the orbital mechanical behavior due to DLOD, enhanced fixation strength should be considered for bone flap repositioning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眶外侧切口术后骨瓣复位固定方法的生物力学分析:有限元分析
目的:在眼科手术中,眼眶外侧切开术(LOA)后的骨瓣复位采用了不同的材料和固定方法,但目前尚无统一标准。本研究旨在通过有限元分析(FEA)模拟 LOA 中眶缘固定的生物力学环境,研究不同固定策略对眼眶稳定性的影响:方法:建立并验证了有限元模型(FEM),以模拟在常规外侧眶切开术(CLOA)和深外侧眶减压术(DLOD)中使用单钛板固定、双钛板固定和双可吸收板固定方法时各种载荷下的机械响应。然后根据临床病例对模拟结果进行了验证:结果:在类似条件下,钛合金固定材料的最大等效应力(MES)大于可吸收钢板材料。在静态和生理条件下,所有有限元组都能确保系统结构的稳定性,材料应力保持在安全范围内。与CLOA相比,DLOD涉及到切除眶外侧壁,改变了应力传导,导致MES和最大总变形(MTD)分别增加了1.96倍和2.62倍。在 50N 的水平荷载下,FEM/DLOD 的 MES 超过了材料自身的强度,与 FEM/CLOA 相比,MES 和 MTD 分别增加了 3.18 倍和 6.64 倍。在 50N 的垂直力作用下,每个 FEM 所承受的 MES 都在安全范围内。骨瓣旋转角度在不同情况下变化很小。在随访期间,本研究验证的 12 名患者均未出现与内固定装置相关的并发症:结论:在静态或生理条件下,各种固定方法都能有效保持眼眶切开部位的稳定性,而可吸收材料具有更平滑的应力传递特性,更适合应用于 CLOA。在钛板固定中,单钛板更能承受垂直应力,而双钛板更能承受水平应力。鉴于 DLOD 导致的眼眶机械行为的改变,在骨瓣重新定位时应考虑增强固定强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents Is panoramic radiography adequate for diagnosing coronoid process hyperplasia? A case series Vascular complications with necrotic lesions following filler injections: Literature systematic review Traumatic ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophilia (TUGSE): Case report of a 63-year-old male patient with a rare self-healing oral mucosal lesion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1