A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of weight management interventions for people with spinal cord injury

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2024-06-09 DOI:10.1111/obr.13785
Claire D. Madigan, James A. King, Carolyn Taylor, Sven P. Hoekstra, Heneritta E. Graham, Natasha Kirk, Jordan M. Fenton, Vicky L. Goosey-Tolfrey
{"title":"A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of weight management interventions for people with spinal cord injury","authors":"Claire D. Madigan,&nbsp;James A. King,&nbsp;Carolyn Taylor,&nbsp;Sven P. Hoekstra,&nbsp;Heneritta E. Graham,&nbsp;Natasha Kirk,&nbsp;Jordan M. Fenton,&nbsp;Vicky L. Goosey-Tolfrey","doi":"10.1111/obr.13785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>People with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at greater risk of developing obesity and related co-morbidities than those without SCI. The objectives of this systematic review were to examine the effectiveness of weight management interventions for people with SCI and to synthesize the experiences of people involved with SCI weight management (e.g., SCI healthcare professionals and caregivers). Five databases were searched (up to July 31, 2023) and 5,491 potentially eligible articles were identified. Following screening, 22 articles were included, comprising 562 adults. There was considerable heterogeneity in study design and weight loss interventions included behavioral nutritional and exercise education sessions, recalling food diaries, exercise interventions, and pharmaceuticals. The mean percentage change of the pooled body mass data equated to −4.0 ± 2.3%, with a range from −0.5 to −7.6%. In addition, 38% of the individuals with SCI who completed a weight loss intervention (<i>N</i> = 262) had a ≥5% reduction in body weight. Collectively, although on average the included interventions led to moderate weight loss, the finding that just over a third of individuals achieved clinically meaningful 5% weight loss suggests that available interventions for this population may need to be improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":"25 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/obr.13785","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obr.13785","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at greater risk of developing obesity and related co-morbidities than those without SCI. The objectives of this systematic review were to examine the effectiveness of weight management interventions for people with SCI and to synthesize the experiences of people involved with SCI weight management (e.g., SCI healthcare professionals and caregivers). Five databases were searched (up to July 31, 2023) and 5,491 potentially eligible articles were identified. Following screening, 22 articles were included, comprising 562 adults. There was considerable heterogeneity in study design and weight loss interventions included behavioral nutritional and exercise education sessions, recalling food diaries, exercise interventions, and pharmaceuticals. The mean percentage change of the pooled body mass data equated to −4.0 ± 2.3%, with a range from −0.5 to −7.6%. In addition, 38% of the individuals with SCI who completed a weight loss intervention (N = 262) had a ≥5% reduction in body weight. Collectively, although on average the included interventions led to moderate weight loss, the finding that just over a third of individuals achieved clinically meaningful 5% weight loss suggests that available interventions for this population may need to be improved.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对脊髓损伤患者体重管理干预措施的系统回顾和定性综述。
脊髓损伤(SCI)患者患肥胖症及相关并发症的风险高于非 SCI 患者。本系统性综述的目的是研究针对 SCI 患者的体重管理干预措施的有效性,并总结参与 SCI 体重管理的人员(如 SCI 医护人员和护理人员)的经验。我们检索了五个数据库(截至 2023 年 7 月 31 日),发现了 5,491 篇可能符合条件的文章。经过筛选,共纳入 22 篇文章,包括 562 名成人。研究设计存在相当大的异质性,减肥干预措施包括行为营养和运动教育课程、回忆食物日记、运动干预和药物。汇总体重数据的平均百分比变化为-4.0 ± 2.3%,范围在-0.5%至-7.6%之间。此外,在完成减肥干预的 SCI 患者(N = 262)中,有 38% 的人体重下降了 ≥5%。总的来说,虽然所纳入的干预措施平均能使体重适度减轻,但发现仅有超过三分之一的人实现了有临床意义的 5% 的体重减轻,这表明针对这一人群的现有干预措施可能需要改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
期刊最新文献
The impact of behavioral weight management interventions on eating behavior traits in adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of childhood obesity with pubertal development in boys: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in adherence to physical activity guidelines from 1997 to 2018 among adults with obesity: An analysis from the US National Health Interview Survey. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic bariatric surgery in patients of 70 years and older: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Valuing behavioral interventions for obesity reduction: A scoping review of economic models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1