Exploration of new space elicits phosphorylation of GluA1(Ser831) and S6K and expression of Arc in the hippocampus in vivo as in long-term potentiation.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Molecular Brain Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1186/s13041-024-01100-x
Roberta Cagnetta, Jean-Claude Lacaille, Nahum Sonenberg
{"title":"Exploration of new space elicits phosphorylation of GluA1(Ser831) and S6K and expression of Arc in the hippocampus in vivo as in long-term potentiation.","authors":"Roberta Cagnetta, Jean-Claude Lacaille, Nahum Sonenberg","doi":"10.1186/s13041-024-01100-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The brain responds to experience through modulation of synaptic transmission, that is synaptic plasticity. An increase in the strength of synaptic transmission is manifested as long-term potentiation (LTP), while a decrease in the strength of synaptic transmission is expressed as long-term depression (LTD). Most of the studies of synaptic plasticity have been carried out by induction via electrophysiological stimulation. It is largely unknown in which behavioural tasks such synaptic plasticity occurs. Moreover, some stimuli can induce both LTP and LTD, thus making it difficult to separately study the different forms of synaptic plasticity. Two studies have shown that an aversive memory task - inhibitory avoidance learning and contextual fear conditioning - physiologically and selectively induce LTP and an LTP-like molecular change, respectively, in the hippocampus in vivo. Here, we show that a non-aversive behavioural task - exploration of new space - physiologically and selectively elicits a biochemical change in the hippocampus that is a hallmark of LTP. Specifically, we found that exploration of new space induces an increase in the phosphorylation of GluA1(Ser831), without affecting the phosphorylation of GluA1(Ser845), which are biomarkers of early-LTP and not NMDAR-mediated LTD. We also show that exploration of new space engenders the phosphorylation of the translational regulator S6K and the expression of Arc, which are features of electrophysiologically-induced late-LTP in the hippocampus. Therefore, our results show that exploration of new space is a novel non-aversive behavioural paradigm that elicits molecular changes in vivo that are analogous to those occurring during early- and late-LTP, but not during NMDAR-mediated LTD.</p>","PeriodicalId":18851,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Brain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-024-01100-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The brain responds to experience through modulation of synaptic transmission, that is synaptic plasticity. An increase in the strength of synaptic transmission is manifested as long-term potentiation (LTP), while a decrease in the strength of synaptic transmission is expressed as long-term depression (LTD). Most of the studies of synaptic plasticity have been carried out by induction via electrophysiological stimulation. It is largely unknown in which behavioural tasks such synaptic plasticity occurs. Moreover, some stimuli can induce both LTP and LTD, thus making it difficult to separately study the different forms of synaptic plasticity. Two studies have shown that an aversive memory task - inhibitory avoidance learning and contextual fear conditioning - physiologically and selectively induce LTP and an LTP-like molecular change, respectively, in the hippocampus in vivo. Here, we show that a non-aversive behavioural task - exploration of new space - physiologically and selectively elicits a biochemical change in the hippocampus that is a hallmark of LTP. Specifically, we found that exploration of new space induces an increase in the phosphorylation of GluA1(Ser831), without affecting the phosphorylation of GluA1(Ser845), which are biomarkers of early-LTP and not NMDAR-mediated LTD. We also show that exploration of new space engenders the phosphorylation of the translational regulator S6K and the expression of Arc, which are features of electrophysiologically-induced late-LTP in the hippocampus. Therefore, our results show that exploration of new space is a novel non-aversive behavioural paradigm that elicits molecular changes in vivo that are analogous to those occurring during early- and late-LTP, but not during NMDAR-mediated LTD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索新空间会引起 GluA1(Ser831)和 S6K 的磷酸化,以及体内海马中 Arc 的表达,这与长期电位一样。
大脑通过调节突触传递对经验做出反应,这就是突触可塑性。突触传递强度的增加表现为长期延时(LTP),而突触传递强度的降低则表现为长期抑制(LTD)。大多数突触可塑性研究都是通过电生理刺激诱导进行的。目前还不清楚这种突触可塑性发生在哪些行为任务中。此外,有些刺激可同时诱导 LTP 和 LTD,因此很难分别研究不同形式的突触可塑性。有两项研究表明,厌恶性记忆任务--抑制性回避学习和情境性恐惧条件反射--分别在体内海马中生理上和选择性地诱导 LTP 和类似 LTP 的分子变化。在这里,我们展示了一种非逆转性的行为任务--探索新空间--在生理上和选择性地引起海马的生化变化,这种变化是 LTP 的标志。具体来说,我们发现探索新空间会诱导 GluA1(Ser831)的磷酸化增加,而不影响 GluA1(Ser845)的磷酸化,后者是早期 LTP 而非 NMDAR 介导的 LTD 的生物标志物。我们还发现,对新空间的探索会引起翻译调节因子 S6K 的磷酸化和 Arc 的表达,而这正是电生理诱导的海马晚期 LTP 的特征。因此,我们的研究结果表明,探索新空间是一种新型的非厌恶行为范式,它在体内引起的分子变化类似于早期和晚期LTP期间发生的变化,但不类似于NMDAR介导的LTD期间发生的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Brain
Molecular Brain NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Brain is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of studies on the nervous system at the molecular, cellular, and systems level providing a forum for scientists to communicate their findings. Molecular brain research is a rapidly expanding research field in which integrative approaches at the genetic, molecular, cellular and synaptic levels yield key information about the physiological and pathological brain. These studies involve the use of a wide range of modern techniques in molecular biology, genomics, proteomics, imaging and electrophysiology.
期刊最新文献
Circadian cilia transcriptome in mouse brain across physiological and pathological states. TRPM4 inhibition slows neuritogenesis progression of cortical neurons Simulated weightlessness procedure, head-down bed rest has reversible effects on the metabolism of rhesus macaque. Absence of ATG9A and synaptophysin demixing on Rab5 mutation-induced giant endosomes. Electroacupuncture reduces inflammatory damage following cerebral ischemia-reperfusion by enhancing ABCA1-mediated efferocytosis in M2 microglia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1