GPs' views of prescribing beta- blockers for people with anxiety disorders: a qualitative study.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-31 Print Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0091
Charlotte Archer, David Kessler, Nicola Wiles, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Katrina Turner
{"title":"GPs' views of prescribing beta- blockers for people with anxiety disorders: a qualitative study.","authors":"Charlotte Archer, David Kessler, Nicola Wiles, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Katrina Turner","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between 2003 and 2018, incident prescriptions of beta-blockers for anxiety increased substantially, particularly for young adults. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance for anxiety does not recommend beta-blockers, probably due to a lack of evidence to support such use. Recent reports have highlighted the potential risks of beta-blockers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand when and why GPs prescribe beta-blockers for people with anxiety.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>In-depth interviews with 17 GPs in Bristol and the surrounding areas.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Interviews were held by telephone or video call. A topic guide was used to ensure consistency across interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Many GPs viewed beta-blockers as 'low risk', particularly for young adults. Some GPs viewed beta-blockers as an alternative to benzodiazepines, acting quickly and not leading to dependence. GPs reflected that some patients appeared to want an 'immediate fix' to their symptoms, which GPs thought beta-blockers could potentially offer. This is salient in light of substantial waiting lists for talking therapies and delays in antidepressants taking effect. GPs described how some patients seemed more willing to try beta-blockers than antidepressants, as patients did not perceive them as 'mental health drugs' and therefore viewed them as potentially more acceptable and less stigmatising. Further, GPs viewed beta-blockers as 'patient-led', with patients managing their own dose and frequency, without GP input.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many GPs believe that beta-blockers have a role to play in the management of anxiety. Given recent increases in the prescribing of these drugs in primary care, there is a need to assess their safety and effectiveness as a treatment for people with anxiety disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e735-e741"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Between 2003 and 2018, incident prescriptions of beta-blockers for anxiety increased substantially, particularly for young adults. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance for anxiety does not recommend beta-blockers, probably due to a lack of evidence to support such use. Recent reports have highlighted the potential risks of beta-blockers.

Aim: To understand when and why GPs prescribe beta-blockers for people with anxiety.

Design and setting: In-depth interviews with 17 GPs in Bristol and the surrounding areas.

Method: Interviews were held by telephone or video call. A topic guide was used to ensure consistency across interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically.

Results: Many GPs viewed beta-blockers as 'low risk', particularly for young adults. Some GPs viewed beta-blockers as an alternative to benzodiazepines, acting quickly and not leading to dependence. GPs reflected that some patients appeared to want an 'immediate fix' to their symptoms, which GPs thought beta-blockers could potentially offer. This is salient in light of substantial waiting lists for talking therapies and delays in antidepressants taking effect. GPs described how some patients seemed more willing to try beta-blockers than antidepressants, as patients did not perceive them as 'mental health drugs' and therefore viewed them as potentially more acceptable and less stigmatising. Further, GPs viewed beta-blockers as 'patient-led', with patients managing their own dose and frequency, without GP input.

Conclusion: Many GPs believe that beta-blockers have a role to play in the management of anxiety. Given recent increases in the prescribing of these drugs in primary care, there is a need to assess their safety and effectiveness as a treatment for people with anxiety disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索全科医生对为焦虑症患者开具β-受体阻滞剂处方的看法:一项定性研究。
背景:2003-2018 年间,β-受体阻滞剂治疗焦虑症的处方大幅增加,尤其是在年轻人中。NICE焦虑症指南并不推荐使用β-受体阻滞剂,这可能是由于缺乏证据支持此类药物的使用。最近的报告强调了β-受体阻滞剂的潜在风险。目的:了解全科医生何时及为何为焦虑症患者开具β-受体阻滞剂处方:对 17 名全科医生进行深入访谈:访谈通过电话或视频电话进行。访谈采用主题指南,以确保访谈的一致性。对访谈进行录音、逐字记录和专题分析:许多全科医生认为β-受体阻滞剂是 "低风险 "药物,尤其是对年轻人而言。一些全科医生认为β-受体阻滞剂是苯二氮卓类药物的替代品,起效迅速,不会导致依赖性。全科医生反映,一些患者似乎希望 "立即解决 "他们的症状,而全科医生认为β-受体阻滞剂有可能提供这种治疗。鉴于谈话疗法的候诊人数众多以及抗抑郁药物迟迟不能见效,这一点显得尤为突出。据全科医生描述,与抗抑郁药物相比,一些患者似乎更愿意尝试β-受体阻滞剂,因为患者并不认为它们是 "精神健康药物",因此可能更容易接受,也更不容易被污名化。此外,全科医生认为β-受体阻滞剂是 "患者主导 "的,患者可自行掌握剂量和频率,全科医生无需参与:结论:许多全科医生认为β-受体阻滞剂在焦虑症的治疗中可以发挥作用。鉴于近期基层医疗机构对此类药物处方的增加,有必要对其作为焦虑症患者治疗方法的安全性和有效性进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Supporting patients to use online services in general practice: focused ethnographic case study. Future Health Today: A pragmatic cluster randomised trial of quality improvement activities in general practice for patients at risk of undiagnosed cancer. Lived experiences of end-of-life care at home in the UK: a scoping review of qualitative research. What helps or hinders the communication of poor prognosis between secondary and primary care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis. Relationship between research activity and the performance of English general practices: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1