A wandering mind reflects a lonely mind: A cross-cultural study

Shuyan Liu , Min Zhao , Ruihua Li , Chuanning Huang , Jiang Du , Daniel J. Schad , Stephan Heinzel
{"title":"A wandering mind reflects a lonely mind: A cross-cultural study","authors":"Shuyan Liu ,&nbsp;Min Zhao ,&nbsp;Ruihua Li ,&nbsp;Chuanning Huang ,&nbsp;Jiang Du ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Schad ,&nbsp;Stephan Heinzel","doi":"10.1016/j.crbeha.2024.100153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our minds wander for half of our waking time, and evidence suggests that a wandering mind is often an unhappy one. However, the specific contents of unpleasant thoughts and feelings during mind wandering remain undiscovered. Here, we aim to investigate if mind wandering may closely relate to feelings of loneliness, such as experiencing a sense of being left out and isolated from others, within a cross-cultural context. Our study involved participants from the general populations of China (<em>N</em>= 1123) and Germany (<em>N</em>= 1018), surveyed between December 2021 and February 2022. Using an online survey tool, we assessed self-reported mind wandering (measured by the Mind Wandering Spontaneous and Deliberate Scale) and loneliness (measured by the UCLA Loneliness Scale), while controlling for self-esteem (measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale), self-efficacy (measured by the General Self-efficacy Scale), and mental health status (measured by the General Health Questionnaire). Strikingly, we found that approximately half of the respondents in both China and Germany reported feelings of loneliness (49.8% in China versus 49.5% in Germany, <em>p</em>= 0.936). Regression analysis further revealed that higher levels of self-reported spontaneous (<em>β</em> = 0.04, <em>p</em>= 0.047) and deliberate mind wandering (<em>β</em> = 0.05, <em>p</em>= 0.009) were associated with higher levels of loneliness, even after controlling for sociodemographic variables, self-esteem, self-efficacy, and mental health status. These findings suggest that loneliness is a pervasive experience across cultures and may serve as a driving factor underlying unpleasant thoughts and feelings during episodes of mind wandering.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72746,"journal":{"name":"Current research in behavioral sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266651822400007X/pdfft?md5=162e9a9833f52d42b15e9334d161028e&pid=1-s2.0-S266651822400007X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in behavioral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266651822400007X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our minds wander for half of our waking time, and evidence suggests that a wandering mind is often an unhappy one. However, the specific contents of unpleasant thoughts and feelings during mind wandering remain undiscovered. Here, we aim to investigate if mind wandering may closely relate to feelings of loneliness, such as experiencing a sense of being left out and isolated from others, within a cross-cultural context. Our study involved participants from the general populations of China (N= 1123) and Germany (N= 1018), surveyed between December 2021 and February 2022. Using an online survey tool, we assessed self-reported mind wandering (measured by the Mind Wandering Spontaneous and Deliberate Scale) and loneliness (measured by the UCLA Loneliness Scale), while controlling for self-esteem (measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale), self-efficacy (measured by the General Self-efficacy Scale), and mental health status (measured by the General Health Questionnaire). Strikingly, we found that approximately half of the respondents in both China and Germany reported feelings of loneliness (49.8% in China versus 49.5% in Germany, p= 0.936). Regression analysis further revealed that higher levels of self-reported spontaneous (β = 0.04, p= 0.047) and deliberate mind wandering (β = 0.05, p= 0.009) were associated with higher levels of loneliness, even after controlling for sociodemographic variables, self-esteem, self-efficacy, and mental health status. These findings suggest that loneliness is a pervasive experience across cultures and may serve as a driving factor underlying unpleasant thoughts and feelings during episodes of mind wandering.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
徘徊的心灵反映了孤独的心灵:跨文化研究
我们一半的清醒时间都在神游,有证据表明,神游的人往往不快乐。然而,思维游离时不愉快的想法和感觉的具体内容仍未被发现。在此,我们旨在研究在跨文化背景下,思绪游离是否与孤独感密切相关,如体验到被遗弃和与他人隔离的感觉。我们的研究涉及中国(1123 人)和德国(1018 人)的普通人群,调查时间为 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 2 月。我们使用在线调查工具,评估了自我报告的心智游离(通过心智游离自发和故意量表测量)和孤独感(通过加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表测量),同时控制了自尊(通过罗森伯格自尊量表测量)、自我效能(通过一般自我效能量表测量)和心理健康状况(通过一般健康问卷测量)。令人惊讶的是,我们发现中国和德国都有大约一半的受访者表示有孤独感(中国为 49.8%,德国为 49.5%,P= 0.936)。回归分析进一步显示,即使在控制了社会人口学变量、自尊、自我效能感和心理健康状况之后,自我报告的较高水平的自发(β = 0.04,p= 0.047)和有意的思想游离(β = 0.05,p= 0.009)与较高水平的孤独感相关。这些研究结果表明,孤独感是不同文化中普遍存在的一种体验,它可能是心智游离发作时产生不愉快想法和感受的一个驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current research in behavioral sciences
Current research in behavioral sciences Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents The causal role of numerical and non-numerical order processing abilities in the early development of mathematics skills: Evidence from an intervention study Discrete memories of a continuous world: A working memory perspective on event segmentation Relationships between physical activity and loneliness: A systematic review of intervention studies Do narcissists possess a sense of purpose? Purpose-in-life and narcissism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1